Liberal Gloating

  • Thread starter Thread starter MistaGuitah
  • Start date Start date
Well folks, we have our first certifiably mentally ill poster.

And he's a little person too. How cute.
Is Tattoo also now a member today?

1686865476248.png
 
within 99.5% accuracy of each other

Who says? Who's keeping tabs and deciding what's accurate and what's not?
Can you list one of the 1 in 20 times when the scripture fucked it up?
 
Last edited:
Who says? Who's keeping tabs and decided what's accurate and what's not?
Can you list these 1 in 20 times when the scripture fucked it up?
Go ahead and list them then. Go ahead and disprove it all with your vast scientific knowledge, LOL!

Wait, do you actually think biblical scholars and researchers are just a bunch of zealous crackpots who believe in faries? LOL! You probably do because you're so, so, so ignorant of what research is done, what it involves, and who conducts it.

Many of the greatest scientific minds, including medical doctors and surgeons, astronomers and physicists, military commanders, geologists, biologists, archeologists, etc., are not only the ones doing some of the greatest research but who are people far, far, far, far smarter than you or anyone you ever met.

The crazy thing is not that you're ignorant of that fact, but instead of doing the most basic thing anyone with a brain would do (i.e. learn about it), you not only discount it, you mock and scoff at the people who try to explain it to you. If you had any brains then you'd at least give some degree of consideration that what innumerable scientists have been saying for centuries might actually be valid.

Go find out for yourself what meticulous science goes into it - everything from powerful electron microscopes, to geological research on trace minerals found on manuscripts in various regions, comparisons to non-biblical literature of the same eras, to references made by philosophers and scientists of the same era, carbon dating technology, trace DNA, physics and astronomy and meteorology, handwriting experts, textual criticism, endless archeological discoveries, etc.

Man, if you can't demonstrate some intelligence from now on, I'm just going to ignore you. Perhaps I should have long ago but it's such a pity to leave someone to the tragedy of their own ignorance. Seriously man, either show that you have a functional brain or I'm just going to write you off as an utterly hopeless lunatic who can never, ever, ever be reasoned with.
 
give some degree of consideration that what innumerable scientists have been saying for centuries might actually be valid.

What about the even larger group of scholars, doctors, scientists, etc. who call the whole thing insane?
Do you take any degrees of consideration of their research?
 
Go ahead and list them then. Go ahead and disprove it all with your vast scientific knowledge, LOL!

Wait, do you actually think biblical scholars and researchers are just a bunch of zealous crackpots who believe in faries? LOL! You probably do because you're so, so, so ignorant of what research is done, what it involves, and who conducts it.

Many of the greatest scientific minds, including medical doctors and surgeons, astronomers and physicists, military commanders, geologists, biologists, archeologists, etc., are not only the ones doing some of the greatest research but who are people far, far, far, far smarter than you or anyone you ever met.

The crazy thing is not that you're ignorant of that fact, but instead of doing the most basic thing anyone with a brain would do (i.e. learn about it), you not only discount it, you mock and scoff at the people who try to explain it to you. If you had any brains then you'd at least give some degree of consideration that what innumerable scientists have been saying for centuries might actually be valid.

Go find out for yourself what meticulous science goes into it - everything from powerful electron microscopes, to geological research on trace minerals found on manuscripts in various regions, comparisons to non-biblical literature of the same eras, to references made by philosophers and scientists of the same era, carbon dating technology, trace DNA, physics and astronomy and meteorology, handwriting experts, textual criticism, endless archeological discoveries, etc.

Man, if you can't demonstrate some intelligence from now on, I'm just going to ignore you. Perhaps I should have long ago but it's such a pity to leave someone to the tragedy of their own ignorance. Seriously man, either show that you have a functional brain or I'm just going to write you off as an utterly hopeless lunatic who can never, ever, ever be reasoned with.
Thanks for the above.................

Not being at all funny here...........you know he's a full blown contrarian so no matter what you present will amount to nothing but pain that he'll try to inflict on you.

He's angry his wife left him so he's lashing out more than ever at all of us even though we're not to blame.

If only he was open an honest about his feelings/pain we'd all be in a better place here. I'd be happy to try and help him any way I could.

This is NOT an excuse for him and DON'T take pity as he knows exactly what he's doing.
 
Last edited:
So two Federal security experts were asked to decipher each of the documents
noted in the indictment. Tell me again how he walks from all 31 charges?

London and Stout walked me through what can be learned about the documents in the indictment. So, let’s start with the one I just mentioned, “TOP SECRET//[redacted]/[redacted]// ORCON/NOFORN. Document dated June 2020 concerning nuclear capabilities of a foreign country.”

London points out that this document about the nuclear program of a foreign country is so sensitive that even two of the codenames related to the document “have been redacted because of their sensitivity.”

The category of this document, “TOP SECRET,” is the highest category of classification, which means that releasing the intelligence in the document would do “exceptionally grave damage to the national security” of the US.

Further underlining the sensitivity of the intelligence in this document about the nuclear program of a foreign country is the notation “ORCON,” which is short for “Originator Control,” meaning that whichever US intelligence agency produced this document would need to approve before the document could be shared with any other agency within the US government, according to London. And “NOFORN” is almost self-explanatory: The document can’t be shared with foreigners.
 
Back
Top