You are comparing apples to oranges man. Protecting or projecting religious beliefs is not even in the same ballpark as “lgbt ideology” or whatever you called it. It’s a shame that they are even in the same discussion to be honest.
You attended public schools? Wake the heck up man. Pure mil-industrial programming.
My children do. No one is getting programmed there.
If you can't admit that you were programmed you aren't going to recognize it at work in your child's school. The fact that it is state run education should be your first clue. They dictate the curriculum. That means the viewpoints and perspectives taught at the school are planned out according to current, and changeable, social mores. That means it's social programming. Those who refuse to accept those norms are essentially social outcasts.
You don't decide what your child will learn. They do. And no one asks your opinion on it, they just decide a curriculum and ram it down the kid's throats. That pretty well makes it programming. I had sex ed in the 90's. It was filth then. I should've busted the teacher's face and done my part but we were all being programmed and were too young and naive to realize it. To go against what is being taught is to be ostracized and that makes it social engineering. You are programmed.
Science is a bunch of theories of which they teach the most popular one so it's pure programming. Social studies is pure leftist programming. History is definitely programming. Health class is programming. A bunch of lies masquerading as truth. It's ok for a teacher to show up decked in LGBT clothing but if it was some other less popular ideology it wouldn't be accepted. Because the programmers have set the dimensions of overton's window and control the narrative and the bounds of what is considered acceptable discussion. Wack your dick off, notable and promoted. Read your bible and pray, bad christian man!
My daughter is a teacher in FL. One of the few sane places left to teach but ti's still programming just like all public ed so at the end of the day it's the same trash.
There is no question there is more evidence for the latter. Objectively speaking.
My point exactly. If you’re like me and don’t like “controlling shit” you better start taking a principled stance against it, whether it’s for things you like or not.
I am taking a stand for it. I’m tired of lgbtq awareness being called grooming and programming.
Well, I can’t speak for others, but I’m aware and support everyone doing their thing. I don’t have a problem with gays or trans, I have a problem with them demanding approbation and others’ accommodation in thought and language. Calling it “Awareness” is disingenuous. It is in fact programming. Teach politeness and tolerance of views one disagrees with, not cultural disruption and political activism because you just “Know” that you’re right.
I guess my point is I don't really care if a US rep thinks men walked with dinosaurs. It means literally nothing.
Yeah, I don’t care TOO much either but I do enjoy standing outside by my solo stove drinking wine and arguing with you numb-nuts. And playing guitar?