Confirmed: Maxine has graphene in her vaccine

  • Thread starter Thread starter VonBonfire
  • Start date Start date
VonBonfire said:
They cause cancer. Big pharma has injured millions through the years. Time to put them out of business...
Click to expand...

Absolute bs. Nothing I dislike more than luddite antivaxxers. Let's go back to the dark ages, not wash our hands, bugger hygiene in surgeries, wear plague doctor masks and travel to Tahiti to try and unsuccessfully treat consumption (tuberculosis)... We'll just write died of King's Evil, Child Bed Fever or Apoplexy on your death certificate or something else uneducated and fitting for an 18th century person.
 
Thumbpicker said:
Nothing I dislike more than luddite antivaxxers. Let's go back to the dark ages, not wash our hands, bugger hygiene in surgeries, wear plague doctor masks and travel to Tahiti to try and unsuccessfully treat consumption (tuberculosis)... We'll just write died of King's Evil, Child Bed Fever or Apoplexy on your death certificate or something else uneducated and fitting for an 18th century person.
Click to expand...
Very dramatic posting but I remain unswayed.

G'day mate.
 
Thumbpicker said:
Nothing I dislike more than luddite antivaxxers. Let's go back to the dark ages, not wash our hands, bugger hygiene in surgeries,
Click to expand...
Actually, antivaxxers attribute the decline in the prevalence of communicable disease—which preceded widespread vaccine use—to an increase in personal hygiene, nutrition and overall standards of living.
 
Thumbpicker said:
Start with a seach "Does DNA in vaccines cause cancer". Plenty of articles to the contrary.
Coronavirus Vaccines and Cancer | Science | AAAS
Click to expand...
That's just one guy's opinion and it's not conclusive. Furthermore, he's responding to a single paper describing one particular mechanism, while there are multiple possible mechanisms for causing cancer. And he acknowledges, "The paper goes on to hypothesize that vaccines that produce the full-length Spike protein might do the same thing - that is, lower the activity of an essential step in antibody production. That's worth investigating, and it's not a crazy idea. But there are several gaps that have to be filled in for it to be true."

As the slaynews article article revealed, Moderna acknowledge the cancer risk from DNA, which is why they wanted to use RNA. But unfortunately you still have the residual DNA. I'm no expert, but I can see enough to recognize there is a cancer risk. And even if "The experts" "Determined" that there was no risk, it could turn out to be they were wrong, 10 years from now, is is usually the case with these novel concoctions.

Were seeing evidence of overall increase in cancer rates as well:

c1f6505a-d332-4401-869e-09d0ba0a916d_1370x451.jpg


Here's some case reports:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374031423_Case_report_BELL'S_PALSY_OR_AN_AGGRESSIVE_INFILTRATING_BASALOID_CARCINOMA_POST-MRNA_VACCINATION_FOR_COVID-19_A_CASE_REPORT_AND_REVIEW_OF_THE_LITERATURE

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.798095/full

https://www.theatlantic.com/science...covid-vaccine-booster-lymphoma-cancer/671308/
 
How anyone would think this new technology, which had previously never been approved due to various safety concerns, would not likely have side effects that were at that point either unknown or suppressed is beyond me. Here's an article about a study looking at how the vaccine reduces immune function, which can increase the potential for cancer, among other problems, including increasing the risk for COVID itself ?

“Impaired type I IFN signaling is linked to many disease risks, most notably cancer, as type 1 IFN signaling suppresses proliferation of both viruses and cancer cells by arresting the cell cycle,” the authors, led by Dr. Stephanie Seneff from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology wrote. "The study found T-cell activity was reduced as well as an increased inflammatory response in the immediate weeks following vaccination, which, in the long-term, puts people at risk for cancer."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/healt...ccines-studies-suggest-immune-changes-4669064
 
Keep making more vaccines. I'd opt to put arsenic in them. In fact if you told the general public it contains massive amounts of arsenic, they'd be lined up for blocks to take them. My dad is the first one in line when a new vaccine comes out. Loves Fauci. There's no hope for him as far as being told anything besides what the MSM is slinging. But he's 80 and seems unaffected by anything. But yeah, more toxic vaccines. We need to be poisoning as many people as possible. Despite the BS that there is a population decline, there's a S-TON of people getting in my way on a daily basis. I'd like to see 3/4 of the population gone.
 
From the Moderna patent, p27

[0012] Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) vaccination is one technique used to stimulate humoral and cellular immune responses to foreign antigens, such as hMPV antigens and/or PIV antigens and/or RSV antigens. The direct injection of genetically engineered DNA (e.g., naked plasmid DNA) into a living host results in a small number of its cells directly producing an antigen, resulting in a protective immunological response. With this technique, however, comes potential problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis, which could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inhibition of tumor suppressor genes.

...Move along, nothing to see here. And if we don't investigate these reports we can claim that they're not proven and then ignore them.

Screen Shot 2023-11-22 at 12.36.03 PM.jpg
 
Here, for all you retarded vaccine danger deniers, is the "Fact check" on the Moderna patent revelation. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/11/s...false-claim-about-moderna-patent-application/

Please note that the article is very careful to argue that the residual DNA doesn't cause "Turbo cancers," making no mention of a general increased risk of cancer. And I'm not sure that's even true, but appears to be assumed so because they claim there is no evidence of it. In fact, numerous doctors have noted an uptick in aggressive cancers. The "Fact check" probably dismissed that evidence as well because it's not a scientific study and goes against the narrative. Likewise the VAERS data I posted.

Furthermore, they claim that the residual DNA is beneath a certain safety threshold. I'm not sure how they can conclusively state that, given variations in manufacture, bad batches, etc. Either way, no one believes it's safe to inject too much of the stuff. The article about the study I linked showed "The loads of SV40 enhancer-promoter, ori, and virus spike in Pfizer are up to 186 billion copies per dose."
 
Last edited:
denialist said:
Here, for all you retarded vaccine danger deniers, is the "Fact check" on the Moderna patent revelation. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/11/s...false-claim-about-moderna-patent-application/

Please note that the article is very careful to argue that the residual DNA doesn't cause "Turbo cancers," making no mention of a general increased risk of cancer. And I'm not sure that's even true, but appears to be assumed so because they claim there is no evidence of it. In fact, numerous doctors have noted an uptick in aggressive cancers. The "Fact check" probably dismissed that evidence as well because it's not a scientific study and goes against the narrative. Likewise the VAERS data I posted.

Furthermore, they claim that the residual DNA is beneath a certain safety threshold. I'm not sure how they can conclusively state that, given variations in manufacture, bad batches, etc. Either way, no one believes it's safe to inject too much of the stuff. The article about the study I linked showed "The loads of SV40 enhancer-promoter, ori, and virus spike in Pfizer are up to 186 billion copies per dose."
Click to expand...
They didn't tell everybody there was DNA in the vaccine when they made everyone get it...?
 
Krull said:
They didn't tell everybody there was DNA in the vaccine when they made everyone get it...?
Click to expand...
Exactly. And that ANY DNA was in the vaccine would have been called "Conspiracy theory" a couple years ago. I guarantee the folks that took the shot never considered the possibility of residual DNA or risk of cancer. Now they're just trying to cover for their own carelessness. And to what end? Cause they worked so well? ?
 
denialist said:
Exactly. And that ANY DNA was in the vaccine would have been called "Conspiracy theory" a couple years ago. I guarantee the folks that took the shot never considered the possibility of residual DNA or risk of cancer. Now they're just trying to cover for their own carelessness. And for what? Cause they worked so well? ?
Click to expand...
They are acting like DNA in vaccines is no big deal ?
 
Tonelover said:
Thanks to all you anti vaxxers for your tireless albeit misguided efforts to save humanity from a threat that doesn't exist. Carry on.
Click to expand...

It’s cute that they all found each other here though. Highly unlikely it would ever happen in the wild.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top