OK, what's next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave M
  • Start date Start date
VonBonfire said:
Thank you. So why can it be detected on a spinning merry go round at a few miles per hour but not on a ball earth spinning at 1000mph?

The answer is "it's all spinning at the same speed so you can't feel it."

It's a catch 22 because they can make the claim and deny that said claim is detectable.
Click to expand...
If the merry go 'round rotated once in a 24hr period as the earth does, you'd feel nothing.

Still an interesting analogy 'though 'cause the smaller the radius, the easier the effect is to feel. IOW, if you were sitting on the edge of something the size of the solar system that rotated once every 24hrs and were therefore travelling at a kazillion miles an hour, it'd still be more-difficult to measure centrifugal force and of course impossible to feel it.

FWIMBW, in both cases, the merry go 'round and the humongous disc, the speed of rotation is the most-critical factor as to whether or not one's able to feel anything. The speed of rotation trumps their sizes, as would be the case even in extreme theoretical examples - from the tiniest circle to the largest imaginable.
 
Monkey Man said:
If the merry go 'round rotated once in a 24hr period as the earth does, you'd feel nothing.

Still an interesting analogy 'though 'cause the smaller the radius, the easier the effect is to feel. IOW, if you were sitting on the edge of something the size of the solar system that rotated once every 24hrs and were therefore travelling at a kazillion miles an hour, it'd still be more-difficult to measure centrifugal force and of course impossible to feel it.

FWIMBW, in both cases, the merry go 'round and the humongous disc, the speed of rotation is the most-critical factor as to whether or not one's able to feel anything. The speed of rotation trumps their sizes, as would be the case even in extreme theoretical examples - from the tiniest circle to the largest imaginable.
Click to expand...

So, what you're really trying to say is that there is no spoon?
 
Monkey Man said:
If the merry go 'round rotated once in a 24hr period as the earth does, you'd feel nothing.

Still an interesting analogy 'though 'cause the smaller the radius, the easier the effect is to feel. IOW, if you were sitting on the edge of something the size of the solar system that rotated once every 24hrs and were therefore travelling at a kazillion miles an hour, it'd still be more-difficult to measure centrifugal force and of course impossible to feel it.

FWIMBW, in both cases, the merry go 'round and the humongous disc, the speed of rotation is the most-critical factor as to whether or not one's able to feel anything. The speed of rotation trumps their sizes, as would be the case even in extreme theoretical examples - from the tiniest circle to the largest imaginable.
Click to expand...
Seems baciwards to me. The force isn't very powerful if you sit in the center of the merry go round even if it's in a fast spin but get towards the edge and it wants to fling you off with authority. On a spinning disc or globe then, if you were at the center or north pole, there would be very little force there yet if you lived on the equator or at the edge of the disc the force would be more intense. Another cause for me to doubt we are on a rapidly spinning ball. It's all too convenient for them to say we are on a spinning ball but "you can't feel it cuz______"
 
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower said:
Time to burn the heretics and witches!
Click to expand...
Now you’re talking….
IMG_1238.jpeg
 
VonBonfire said:
Seems baciwards to me. The force isn't very powerful if you sit in the center of the merry go round even if it's in a fast spin but get towards the edge and it wants to fling you off with authority. On a spinning disc or globe then, if you were at the center or north pole, there would be very little force there yet if you lived on the equator or at the edge of the disc the force would be more intense. Another cause for me to doubt we are on a rapidly spinning ball. It's all too convenient for them to say we are on a spinning ball but "you can't feel it cuz______"
Click to expand...

it's really not comparable to a merry go round, you got to give up on that.
read up on the Coriolis effect if you care to understand stuff. you are correct that the earth spins faster at the equator than it does at the poles. But as I've said multiples time already, the actual speed doesn't matter as long as it stays constant. You like your guns right? Read up on Snipers and the Coriolis effect. Make education fun!
Careful though, you might learn something
 
Aynirar27 said:
it's really not comparable to a merry go round, you got to give up on that.
read up on the Coriolis effect if you care to understand stuff. you are correct that the earth spins faster at the equator than it does at the poles. But as I've said multiples time already, the actual speed doesn't matter as long as it stays constant. You like your guns right? Read up on Snipers and the Coriolis effect. Make education fun!
Careful though, you might learn something
Click to expand...

"Calculate your shot by making these adjustments for the spinning of our planet". It's the same thing as saying "it's spinning so fast you can't feel it". I need to do calculations to make the shot, but it doesn't prove a spinning ball, it just proves there is some force acting on the bullet to force a calculation of trajectory.

Here's a conclusion: the root word of heliocentrism is "helios" which is a false sun god so that concludes it for me. A bunch of lying pagans telling us the shape of our world. I reject it on that alone. The bible has exposed pop science as a pagan fraud.
 
VonBonfire said:
"Calculate your shot by making these adjustments for the spinning of our planet". It's the same thing as saying "it's spinning so fast you can't feel it". I need to do calculations to make the shot, but it doesn't prove a spinning ball, it just proves there is some force acting on the bullet to force a calculation of trajectory.

Here's a conclusion: the root word of heliocentrism is "helios" which is a false sun god so that concludes it for me. A bunch of lying pagans telling us the shape of our world. I reject it on that alone. The bible has exposed pop science as a pagan fraud.
Click to expand...

but that's the point man, you can calculate the trajectory because we know that the earth is spinning.
 
Flat earthers are fuckin retards for fucks sake. Now jump aboard heretic…it’s not the 13th century anymore…
IMG_1237.jpeg
 
Aynirar27 said:
but that's the point man, you can calculate the trajectory because we know that the earth is spinning.
Click to expand...
I had a good buddy who was a physics and electrical engineering guy. He explained that all science does is come up with a good story for how things work. Once you comprehend that, it is a little easier to hold the “Stories” more lightly, recognizing that a different explanation might eventually better explain the phenomena. Maybe the c effect demonstrates a spinning earth, maybe something else. The problem with the spinning ball model is that the only “proof” comes from the government and a very small group of private citizens. Otherwise you just take it on faith (And obviously more than that, but with the previous caveat),
 
He also said that there is no “Proof” in science, only mathematics. FWIW he believed in the spinning ball.
 
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower said:
Yes, tis I.
I just noticed he moved to sad hill.
Click to expand...
I stand corrected. Looks like PLX had all of his posts removed, packed his bags and headed west :dunno:

He told me that that was not him on r-t.net and they were fabricating his likeness, like so many other users there but honestly, I don't know what to believe anymore. :(
 
311splawndude said:
I stand corrected. Looks like PLX had all of his posts removed, packed his bags and headed west :dunno:

He told me that that was not him on r-t.net and they were fabricating his likeness, like so many other users there but honestly, I don't know what to believe anymore. :(
Click to expand...
That’s crazy. Tell him to man up and GTF back here.
 
denialist said:
I had a good buddy who was a physics and electrical engineering guy. He explained that all science does is come up with a good story for how things work. Once you comprehend that, it is a little easier to hold the “Stories” more lightly, recognizing that a different explanation might eventually better explain the phenomena. Maybe the c effect demonstrates a spinning earth, maybe something else. The problem with the spinning ball model is that the only “proof” comes from the government and a very small group of private citizens. Otherwise you just take it on faith (And obviously more than that, but with the previous caveat),
Click to expand...
It’s not the government telling us that the earth is spinning. Dudes figured that out like 2000 years ago.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top