OK, what's next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave M
  • Start date Start date
Warmer compared to when?

That's what the scientists aren't telling you.
See you completely miss the point everytime bro.

The narrative looks at temps from the decades leading up to the Industrial Revolution, i.e. when humans started making mass amounts of CO2. It is warmer now than then

Science just says what the temps are every year. In fact, science taught us about natural cycles too! Other people use that for their narratives.
 
The narrative looks at temps from the decades leading up to the Industrial Revolution, i.e. when humans started making mass amounts of CO2. It is warmer now than then
.....which are still lower than prehistoric times. So it's much ado about nothing because it's been warmer with more Co2 than now. But if there isn't a created urgency, then there is no funding. And if there is no funding, there are no paid science gigs. So it's a self perpetuating thing that uses carefully selected statistics and numbers to generate a narrative. It's kind of like getting aggro about tips on sixth street. If I don't push the "I'm trying to survive" narrative there won't be as much money involved. Except I'm not lying and they are, lol
 
.....which are still lower than prehistoric times. So it's much ado about nothing because it's been warmer with more Co2 than now. But if there isn't a created urgency, then there is no funding. And if there is no funding, there are no paid science gigs. So it's a self perpetuating thing that uses carefully selected statistics and numbers to generate a narrative. It's kind of like getting aggro about tips on sixth street. If I don't push the "I'm trying to survive" narrative there won't be as much money involved. Except I'm not lying and they are, lol
That’s your narrative, not science
 
That’s your narrative, not science
And we're back to your golden boy idealistic way of looking at things. Of course it isn't science, but it's how things work in reality. Learn to differentiate that. People doing stuff for money rarely have pure intentions.
 
And we're back to your golden boy idealistic way of looking at things. Of course it isn't science, but it's how things work in reality. Learn to differentiate that. People doing stuff for money rarely have pure intentions.

That’s your own sad reality.

The same science that shows all kinds of cycles throughout history also shows a rise starting around 1800. It’s the same science
 
The same science that shows all kinds of cycles throughout history also shows a rise starting around 1800. It’s the same science
Discounting everything before 1800 would make it a complete scam. Science tells us the earth is billions of years old. My bible even says that is possible, so a couple hundred years of data isn't enough to generate an accurate picture. Not even close.
 
Discounting everything before 1800 would make it a complete scam. Science tells us the earth is billions of years old. My bible even says that is possible, so a couple hundred years of data isn't enough to generate an accurate picture. Not even close.

I mostly agree yes. But you are continually proving my point that you are against the narrative not the science
Science will most certainly tell you how the old the earth is and that it has been way hotter and way colder than it is now
 
I mostly agree yes. But you are continually proving my point that you are against the narrative not the science
To me real science would just mean the truth. Modern science is mostly mixed up with corporate and globalist interests and government funding so I mostly discard their research. So I guess we have reached an agreement of sort. I think I will celebrate with coffee and tacos.
 
To me real science would just mean the truth. Modern science is mostly mixed up with corporate and globalist interests and government funding so I mostly discard their research. So I guess we have reached an agreement of sort. I think I will celebrate with coffee and tacos.

But what you call “modern science” is just the narrative. It’s not the science. It’s tweets and YouTube thumbnails.

It will ultimately be our demise. The earth is warming. It is in the trend of getting warmer. The earth is old, but this is our time on it, so a few thousand years is just a drop in the bucket for the earth, but it is significant to humans.
A warmer earth will have very significant effects on our way of life. Whether it is caused by humans or nature does not matter, the end result is the same.

if we know, unbiasedly, that we are doing things with the potential to further warm the earth, then I believe it is a good idea to try and do that as little as possible. We can’t change a natural cycle, but we can help slow it down.
And if it is being caused by us, we can slow it down even more.
Don’t ignore the facts because you don’t like how they were presented to you
 
Useful post as always. Good job!
giphy-1.gif
 
It will ultimately be our demise.

I don't believe in global warming alarmism man.

God will destroy anyone who destroys the earth

Revelation 11:18

The Earth endures forever.

Ecclesiastes 1:4

Seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease so long as the earth endures

Genesis 8:22
 
I don’t think science is causing the alarmism though, it’s just people with an agenda
Well since the media exists on selling ads just about every story is spun with sensational headlines. I can't even read news much anymore because it's gotten so over the top.
 
Well since the media exists on selling ads just about every story is spun with sensational headlines. I can't even read news much anymore because it's gotten so over the top.
That’s why I don’t watch the news. I try and catch the local news, but the nearest stations are an hour + east or west of me so it’s really not all that local.
 
Back
Top