
RevDrucifer
Well-known member
Oh boy. Please save the anticipated sarcastic response, but it sounds to me like you don't understand what a conflict of interest is. A conflict of interest arises when an individual or organization has multiple interests and when serving one means working against the other. In this case, your favorite ground dwelling dwarf and mine is receiving benefits from the company whose gear he is touting while representing himself as a neutral and objective gear reviewer, by which he also receives benefits in the form of ad revenue and personal promotion.
As mentioned, the gear itself is the (Known) benefit, which he undermined by labeling the segment "Satisfied customer" and by saying he wasn't paid and didn't want them to "Give" him a guitar — he wanted them to build him a guitar ? That's some crafty linguistics right there. Not quite lying, but lying. And he further went out of his way to claim he wasn't being influenced by the admitted relationship, which was contradicted by his receiving the guitar as compensation for prior video work. That's how I understood it anyways. Finally, the end of the video was basically a Heritage commercial.
You like to think you can maintain objectivity in your assessment of the guitar by just listening to it, but that's naive. You're listening to a world class guitar player for one, and second you don't know what kind of processing he's employed to get the tone he is getting. And while you might like to think your psychologically unique, the enthusiasm he displays — which could be genuine or not — will probably subtly bias your opinion about Heritage guitars. I don't know if you're a big fan of David or Heritage or what, but seems like this is personal. Maybe 'cause I pointed out your boss is probably not the altruistic benefactor you seemed to think? I dunno, I don't care. Hate to burst your bubble bro. Watch the vid, like Tim Pierce, like average Heritage LP's or not, it's up to you. In the meantime, I'll continue to enjoy doing what I do, which among them is constructively pointing out BS and questioning conflicts of interest when I see 'em.
You’re missing the entire point- I don’t give a fuck.
I don’t care if Heritage paid him $10mil to make the vid and give him a guitar every week. I don’t care if he ran it through a whole other studio worth of gear to make it sound the way it sounds. I don’t make purchasing decisions based off YouTube videos. All these vids are entertainment, it’s a quick avenue to hear someone who can play, play a guitar with a pleasing tone. Nothing more, nothing less.
Maybe I AM psychologically unique in that I can’t comprehend why in the fuck anyone would care how the hell the guy makes his money? No amount of words any of them say have ever made me buy a piece of gear, I don’t use YouTube vids to make decisions for me, so how they get paid has ZERO bearing on anything I do in my own life and I cannot fathom how other people let it become a bother to them.
I don’t know who David is, not interested in ever buying a Heritage or any guitar over $1500 and absolutely couldn’t give two fucks less about your thoughts on the owner of my company who I’ve worked alongside for 6 years and you read 1-2 posts about him on a forum without knowing anything else about what we do here. Your negative-tinged angle is certainly noted, though.