
MadAsAHatter
Well-known member
Question is in the title.
I'm thinking more along the lines of bringing a cranked NMV amp down to 100dB or so, not whisper quiet don't wake the baby bedroom levels.Attenuators are junk. If you aren't getting those speakers barking it's never gonna be the same anyways. Might as well just bring a decent OD.
I tried that route with a big Marshall for gigs but personally think an amp/speakers more suited to that dB range is the better choice especially now that some of the more premium attenuators cost as much as a new amp. A 20-35 watt amp with some lower efficiency speakers and an OD will get you in that ballpark too IME.I'm thinking more along the lines of bringing a cranked NMV amp down to 100dB or so, not whisper quiet don't wake the baby bedroom levels.
You can run a reactive load in parallel to a speaker cabinet and get that effect.I'm thinking more along the lines of bringing a cranked NMV amp down to 100dB or so, not whisper quiet don't wake the baby bedroom levels.
This. If I have to play quietly it sounds a lot better running an amp through my Suhr RL and then into my DAW with an IR loader while I listen on headphones, vs through a cab. Quiet cab levels don’t sound as good.
Pretty sure he was suggesting actually re amping the signal with another amp. This is what the power station does for example. I don’t know how it would achieve a better sound, but I don’t really understand the difference between a load box and an attenuator. My rock crusher can function as a load box, so I just guessed the attenuator feature simply allows some of the signal through. But maybe they are totally different things. ?This. If I have to play quietly it sounds a lot better running an amp through my Suhr RL and then into my DAW with an IR loader while I listen on headphones, vs through a cab. Quiet cab levels don’t sound as good.