
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
Absolutely.Will you still adminster Tylenol to your children after these findings?
There really aren’t any findings to speak of that even come close to ruling out confounding variables.
Absolutely.Will you still adminster Tylenol to your children after these findings?
Don't criticize him, he learned how to say "acetaminophen" yesterday.![]()
I personally think it's the number of vaccines, which increased greatly post 1970's, most of which contain mercury (thimerosal) as the preservative. Our dear leader is still bragging about operation warp speed, and loves carrying water for big pharma so I don't ever expect the topic to be broached by him.I guess I should give credit where credit is due.
If people on a guitar forum OTC want to talk about Tylenol and horse dewormer, by all means they should be able to, but I think our President should be much more discrete.
Do you know this for sure ? I mean have you looked at any studies or are you just basing it off the dumbass way Trump unveiled it and with the assumption that RFK II is a moron ?
So no credible scientific researchers have been studying the effects of Aceteminophen ( spelling ? ) on pregnant women for the last ten years or however long ?Such a claim would take years, if not decades to test and confirm.
And guess what, this shit has been studied for decades with the same results, the only difference are the assholes now stating it to the public as fact.
So no credible scientific researchers have been studying the effects of Aceteminophen ( spelling ? ) on pregnant women for the last ten years or however long ?
Anyone can raise their kids they way they want to. I'm gonna start slamming Tylenol though. I feel like this could be the big test.
I'm not disagreeing with you. Or suggesting you're wrong. I just would like to see your work. I mean you sound as if you've looked into this and not just did a 5 minute Google search relying on other people to lead you to that conclusion. Other people who might be biased. Maybe even on Big Pharma's payroll.Yes they have been studying the effects of it, since like the mid 2000s, and it is still inconclusive; because people who study this stuff understand the weight of stating something as a medical/scientific fact
If it was true, a 5 minute google search would be all it took to find pages of articles and studies confirming it. As I said it would be one of the biggest breakthroughs of our lifetime.I'm not disagreeing with you. Or suggesting you're wrong. I just would like to see your work. I mean you sound as if you've looked into this and not just did a 5 minute Google search relying on other people to lead you to that conclusion. Other people who might be biased. Maybe even on Big Pharma's payroll.
So no evidence it has anything whatsoever to do with it ?If it was true, a 5 minute google search would be all it took to find pages of articles and studies confirming it. As I said it would be one of the biggest breakthroughs of our lifetime.
It could lead to treatment or even a cure for those who would want it. People would be dancing in the streets.
But there is nothing. Nothing but experts saying inconclusive over and over again, as they have been for years
Did you mean “will make”? You retard. The man who was pregnant with you must have eaten a shitload of Tylenols right up until the day you were shit out.![]()
There isn’t enough evidence for it to be claimed as conclusive, that’s the point. It’s those confounding variables I mentioned. The evidence isn’t strong enough to rule them outSo no evidence it has anything whatsoever to do with it ?
Do you think there is just one thing that causes autism or do you think there are many different things. Like say cancer ?
Yeah, you're probably right. I just have a hard time believing shit just because some websites say it's true. Particularly when there is clearly an entire industry worth of renewable cash flow involved. Not that I have an easier time believing anything RFK ( Or Trump for that matter) says.There isn’t enough evidence for it to be claimed as conclusive, that’s the point. It’s those confounding variables I mentioned. The evidence isn’t strong enough to rule them out
So no evidence it has anything whatsoever to do with it ?
Do you think there is just one thing that causes autism or do you think there are many different things. Like say cancer ?
Goes for men too. My best friend growing up lived next door. His mom was 22 years younger than his dad. When we were ten his dad in his 60s. His sister was down syndrome and right this very minute my old friend might be naked with a kitchen knife babbling about his family trying to kill him because he's Schizophrenic as shit.It's also a lot of these old ass women having kids after 40. Those eggs are done son. Scrambled and fried. These women get pumped full of god knows what fertility hormones and end up having autistic, mentally disabled, Downs, and other types of kids that are mentally handicapped.
It's sad.
If you are over 40... just adopt... or let it go. It's not something I wish on anyone.
My neighbors who are both over 40 had their first kid... and he is severely mentally disabled. He can only shout sounds and noises, wave his arms, and can't sit still for 10 seconds. It's sad. He is 8 and still wears a diaper.
Yeah, you're probably right. I just have a hard time believing shit just because some websites say it's true. Particularly when there is clearly an entire industry worth of renewable cash flow involved. Not that I have an easier time believing anything RFK ( Or Trump for that matter) says.