Tylenol with make your kid "retarded".

[Robostyle]

Just to be clear- isn't it the combination of tylenol + certain vaccines that possibly links to autism?
Cause everyone is saying tylenol causes autism and i believe this is misleading.

 

[DanTravis62]

You mean these 46 studies?

https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-025-01208-0

Apparently 46 different studies showing correlation isn't enough smoke for nutsack to believe there's a fire somewhere.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Apparently 46 different studies showing correlation isn't enough smoke for nutsack to believe there's a fire somewhere.

It’s not enough for the entire medical and scientific community to believe there is a fire somewhere. Get a grip bro lol

 

[DanTravis62]

It’s not enough for the entire medical and scientific community to believe there is a fire somewhere. Get a grip bro lol

So you think it wouldn't be prudent for pregnant women to limit their tylenol intake? With THAT much correlation?

I don't think you understand how silly this argument makes you look. Honestly at this point if trump offered you 40 million dollars you would refuse it and call him a stupid chump for offering it.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Just to be clear- isn't it the combination of tylenol + certain vaccines that possibly links to autism?
Cause everyone is saying tylenol causes autism and i believe this is misleading.

There are a lot of possible links, and it’s great that they are being studied. But the fact is that none of the studies show an understanding of how it could cause autism, nor are the studies able to separate it from other confounding variables.
This is scientific method 101.

It is not studied well enough for the president of our country to be stating it as fact to the country.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

So you think it wouldn't be prudent for pregnant women to limit their tylenol intake? With THAT much correlation?

I don't think you understand how silly this argument makes you look. Honestly at this point if trump offered you 40 million dollars you would refuse it and call him a stupid chump for offering it.

You don’t get it and you aren’t going to.

 

[DanTravis62]

You don’t get it and you aren’t going to.

Apparently I need some of the crack you are smoking.

 

[Robostyle]

It’s not enough for the entire medical and scientific community to believe there is a fire somewhere. Get a grip bro lol

So the ENTIRE medical and scientific communities have to believe it?

 

[Dan Gleesak]

So the ENTIRE medical and scientific communities have to believe it?

No.
But none of it is concluding that it causes autism with any certainty.

If they found an actual medical link to the two, it could easily be studied and tested and MOST would find the result.

That isn’t happening though

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Apparently I need some of the crack you are smoking.

You need to crack open your middle
School science book and not Twitter

 

[Wizard of Ozz]

Tylenol in 2017 made the same warning statement itself:

 

[DanTravis62]

Just to be clear- isn't it the combination of tylenol + certain vaccines that possibly links to autism?
Cause everyone is saying tylenol causes autism and i believe this is misleading.

That's correct from my understanding as well

You need to crack open your middle
School science book and not Twitter

I believe Harvard and some of the other universities who did the studies probably have a bit of experience with "middle school science" - if you're denying their conclusions, I look forward to your peer reviews of their work, Nutsack. I didn't know we had such a titan of Epidemiology on RT, especially with JDel already being one.

 

[DanTravis62]

Tylenol in 2017 made the same warning statement itself:

Well, Tylenol obviously got hacked. There's no way they could agree with the bad orange man, even by coincidence. They obviously don't have access to the rigorous peer review process Dehydrated Nutsack is capable of

 

[Robostyle]

No.
But none of it is concluding that it causes autism with any certainty.

If they found an actual medical link to the two, it could easily be studied and tested and MOST would find the result.

That isn’t happening though

Well did anyone say it's a certainty? Or just that there are possible links?

 

[Findthetone1]

No.
But none of it is concluding that it causes autism with any certainty.

If they found an actual medical link to the two, it could easily be studied and tested and MOST would find the result.

That isn’t happening though

Don't worry buddy, I'm sure it's "Safe and Effective", so you'll be able to take handfulls next time you get pregnant.

 

[Wizard of Ozz]

Don't worry buddy, I'm sure it's "Safe and Effective", so you'll be able to take handfulls next time you get pregnant.

... I don't think taking it up the ass will cause pregnancy... ass cancer yes... pregnancy no.

But who knows... maybe one of the beta-libs here will be the first male incel to get pregnant from ass sex.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Meta studies are great. They take a lot of info, and distill it into manageable sizes, and there is a chance that someone might find a connection that was missed.
But they are inherently biased, and no actual science is being done in them. Best case scenario is that a possible link is found and can be studied further to show actual causation or not.

So far that hasn’t been found though. I’m not saying it shouldn’t be studied further, I’m just saying people of authority shouldn’t be reporting it as facr

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Don't worry buddy, I'm sure it's "Safe and Effective", so you'll be able to take handfulls next time you get pregnant.

You’re such a dumbass

 

[Dan Gleesak]

That's correct from my understanding as well



I believe Harvard and some of the other universities who did the studies probably have a bit of experience with "middle school science" - if you're denying their conclusions, I look forward to your peer reviews of their work, Nutsack. I didn't know we had such a titan of Epidemiology on RT, especially with JDel already being one.

I am confident they would have the same stance as me.
Why? Because I actually read the studies and form my opinions on them.
Not tweets

 

[Wizard of Ozz]

Meta studies are great. They take a lot of info, and distill it into manageable sizes, and there is a chance that someone might find a connection that was missed.
But they are inherently biased, and no actual science is being done in them. Best case scenario is that a possible link is found and can be studied further to show actual causation or not.

So far that hasn’t been found though. I’m not saying it shouldn’t be studied further, I’m just saying people of authority shouldn’t be reporting it as facr