Anyone good at Tonex captures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pipelineaudio
  • Start date Start date
pipelineaudio

pipelineaudio

Member
It’s been a well known thing since launch that Tonex captures don’t always come out right, often requiring a severe gain and sometimes treble change (sometimes without the treble change being within the range of tonex’s actual controls).

Now a year or two later, it seems like there are more than a few great captures out there, but still little hints on how to do this right.

I know personally it seems like if I have the input hitting the first red during capture, the gain knob can’t be turned up hard enough to make the gain similar. I wonder if making the input level much lower in the capturing process would help but the damn training takes so long it’s almost not worth it to try

Anyone know the real tricks?
 
Just started with mine yesterday. Takes about 5 mins to capture and 15-20 on default training…bout an hour on advanced. I have just been running the input gain about two yellows. Listening back and forth there is only a tiny bit of difference in the treble. Leaving all the knobs straight at noon, I just bump the treble up a tiny bit and it sounds the same. I have been bumping the gain up one notch after the training.
 
The amount of YouTube videos on this problem without any real solution are nutty. I wish we could to the first half and store it and do the actual long training part later
 
The amount of YouTube videos on this problem without any real solution are nutty. I wish we could to the first half and store it and do the actual long training part later
I don’t really think it is a problem, just is what it is. Some is up to the speed of the pc. I see where some say it takes 5 hours? Are they running a commodore 64 or something? I have only been doing direct amp captures, maybe micing a cab takes longer.
Pretty surprised how well it responds with changes in the volume control and picking dynamics.
 
I don’t really think it is a problem, just is what it is. Some is up to the speed of the pc. I see where some say it takes 5 hours? Are they running a commodore 64 or something? I have only been doing direct amp captures, maybe micing a cab takes longer.
Pretty surprised how well it responds with changes in the volume control and picking dynamics.
Are you on a Mac or PC? Apparently if you’re not using an Nvidia card, you’re hosed for time.
 
Are you on a Mac or PC? Apparently if you’re not using an Nvidia card, you’re hosed for time.
Yeah, on a 4060 GPU it only takes like 10 minutes for a standard training. Sadly, my computer has a 5070, which is too new because it won't work. They are working on that issue now. That is why I haven't done more captures.
 
I don’t really think it is a problem, just is what it is.
You may not think its a problem, but its well documented, and especially frustrating for people who have businesses making captures

Some is up to the speed of the pc. I see where some say it takes 5 hours? Are they running a commodore 64 or something? I have only been doing direct amp captures, maybe micing a cab takes longer.

That's a different issue. Sadly, also, Tonex still insists on not being able to store the testing for training later, making it impossible to capture many amps in a collection and doing the training later, which is one place NAM really shines
 
I captured my Plexi and it turned out well. I attached it to a Celestion Greenback IR, but may possibly still have the raw track.

I had to buy the Axe IO to use as a re-amp device and then it was super easy
 
I captured my Plexi and it turned out well. I attached it to a Celestion Greenback IR, but may possibly still have the raw track.

I had to buy the Axe IO to use as a re-amp device and then it was super easy
I sent the Axe I/O reamp box back. It didn't sound so good and introduced some noise. I ended up buying a passive Palmer River Trave and it sounded way better to me and was only a little over a $100.

https://www.palmer-germany.com/en/products/di-boxes/26882/river-trave
 
I have been doing some Kemper vs real comparisons lately. I will do the SLO on the Tonex and report back.
 
Last edited:
You may not think its a problem, but its well documented, and especially frustrating for people who have businesses making captures



That's a different issue. Sadly, also, Tonex still insists on not being able to store the testing for training later, making it impossible to capture many amps in a collection and doing the training later, which is one place NAM really shines
I dunno, still seems like a non issue. Is what it is. If I use default its like 20 minutes per capture. Takes me that long to setup another amp anyway.
 
I captured my Plexi and it turned out well. I attached it to a Celestion Greenback IR, but may possibly still have the raw track.

I had to buy the Axe IO to use as a re-amp device and then it was super easy

I had to borrow a laptop with a 4060 because of the 5070 issue I mentioned above, but I did 1 capture of my 5153 through a loadbox reamped and it came out great. Now I use it in my ToneX One into the poweramp, and it is almost like playing the head itself. I have been pretty much playing that lately since I dont want to turn on the tubes while it is hot as hell outside.
 
It’s been a well known thing since launch that Tonex captures don’t always come out right, often requiring a severe gain and sometimes treble change (sometimes without the treble change being within the range of tonex’s actual controls).

Now a year or two later, it seems like there are more than a few great captures out there, but still little hints on how to do this right.

I know personally it seems like if I have the input hitting the first red during capture, the gain knob can’t be turned up hard enough to make the gain similar. I wonder if making the input level much lower in the capturing process would help but the damn training takes so long it’s almost not worth it to try

Anyone know the real tricks?
I've done quite a few but more NAM recently - the gotchas though are somewhat similar.

If you have a reamp box, I recommend folks look at the Lehle P-Split III or the Signal Art, you should be able to squeeze some pretty good profiles provided you put a little bit of time into gain-staging / calibrating your signal chain.

I usually recommend folks skip over the "don't clip the red" on ToneX' setup wizard and instead do their own calibration. The simple way to do it is as follows (it can get a lot more technical but you'll get good results this way too):

1. On your audio interface set all your level sliders at unity gain. Very important to ensure your instrument input's physical knob or gain slider all the way down. So, keeping it a unity gain

2. In the DAW of your choice, generate a sine of your choice; I usually do a -12 dBFS @ 1000 Hz.

3. Route that sine through one of the Line Outputs and into your reamp box

4. Route the reamp box's output (so the unbalanced out with a TS cable) back into your audio interface INSTRUMENT input

5. Check the reading you see on the instrument input.

- If it's reading less than what you generated (so -12 dBFS to keep with the program) like -16 dBFS, try to use the pot on the reamp box to get the level right.

- If your reamp box doesn't have a volume adjustment pot, bump the sliders on your Line Out up / down (careful to not clip the converters) until you do.

- What you want to get on the INSTRUMENT input is the same dBFS value you're generating out through the Line Out

6. [Optional] Once you have this sorted, you can check your interface manual and look for "maximum input gain" on the Instrument / Hi-Z input - that will give you the dBu value your profiles are calibrated for - useful if you share them with other folks so that they can get the best experience playing through them

7. Launch the ToneX training & ignore anything that has to do with signal levels; it might throw a warning that you're tickling the first RED dot - ignore it.

8. Go through the training process & enjoy the profile

Having done a lot of profiles in the past years, I've noticed that the more gain / saturation & high-end your gear has, the harder it is for the profiling process to nail it. NAM isn't as succeptible as ToneX, Quad Cortex or Kemper but still struggles a bit to get the exceptional levels of accuracy it's renowed for if you throw tons of saturation & high-end at it.
What I recommend is folks also do AMPs separate from Boost pedals & compare against single profiles with both Boost + Amp.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top