I
InFlames235
New member
NewWorldMan":30jfme2c said:RJF":30jfme2c said:I personally don't think it sounds all that bad. If I had bought a new JP2C and loved it, I'd just keep it. Mesa will probably come up with a fix over time anyway. I would think it could be worked around live anyway, and in a band setting with everyone making noise, I doubt an audience would notice much. Some things are more important to others I guess. I personally wouldn't sweat that in the least.
I personally don't want a "fix". I'd rather have the circuit original. In that clip, the volume is practically off. The repeat doesn't scale much with volume up.
For me, I'd rather have it as-is than to alter the circuit so that I avoid a volume jump on a repeat for the 3 seconds of a show when I happen to be holding a delayed, distorted note that's still repeating and switch to my clean channel before the note trails off enough...![]()
Why not just turn off the delay in that one instance before switching channels if it's that bothersome instead of wanting to change the circuit? That would be more important to me.
I can understand why it would be a bigger problem for some folks than it is for me.
So is it ONLY when you're still holding the note and switching to the clean channel or will it still do it if you have trails still going but not holding the note and switching?