
scottosan
Well-known member
If you want to be able to sell on the same platform as the big guys, you need to expect to deal with difficult customers. That's just how it is.
scottosan":1izbx69p said:Doesnt matterPhil Jacques":1izbx69p said:scottosan":1izbx69p said:Based on the video I'd take it back and expect another seller to take it back
As I said, he has made no attempt to try my request to use a different power supply. None. I am trying to be fair, but I have to be fair to myself as well. I know 100% this is user error or a scam. This pedal was perfect when it left my house and it only traveled a couple states over in a bubbled wrapped well packaged box.
Phil Jacques":1rejyuro said:I offered him a solution after I just spoke again to the original company who sold to me. Apparently they will now accept it as a return. Not sure why they changed their mind all of a sudden.
I told him I will return it as defective to where I originally purchased from, will have him ship there with RMA # on box, once I receive money he will get paid back.
He has not responded as of yet but yesterday he would respond within 30 seconds of me messaging him. I am about to say F it and let Reverb close my account.
scottosan":3bnk7m5v said:My point isn't that the OP is wrong. It's that if Reverb sides with him then he not going to win. If you sell stuff on reverb and eBay this is what life has become.
boyedav":29z2lgut said:This was your listing, right?
https://reverb.com/item/22694597-electr ... _sold=true
You failed to mention in your diatribe that you advertised your Used pedal as 'Brand New'. Reverb makes it pretty clear that this classification is for dealers/retailers. Used items in new condition would be 'Mint', not 'Brand New'. This has been covered before, and it's not like Reverb makes it hard to know this. That in and of itself would make your item not-as-described.
The buyer states the item doesn't work right and provides a video showing the issue, against your unsubstantiated claim that the item (whose condition you misstated) worked right a few days ago. The buyer's request for return sure seems justified, but you deny the request, so they file a dispute, and yet you're somehow confused about why Reverb sided with them.
You do have one thing right though: you should go ahead and have Reverb close your account.
matt":39w3o486 said:scottosan":39w3o486 said:Doesnt matterPhil Jacques":39w3o486 said:scottosan":39w3o486 said:Based on the video I'd take it back and expect another seller to take it back
As I said, he has made no attempt to try my request to use a different power supply. None. I am trying to be fair, but I have to be fair to myself as well. I know 100% this is user error or a scam. This pedal was perfect when it left my house and it only traveled a couple states over in a bubbled wrapped well packaged box.
It would take the buyer literally 30 seconds to try it with the power supply that comes with the unit. What do you think EHX would tell a customer who complains that their pedal isn't working properly with a third party power supply?
psychodave":2y2c9ypj said:Phil Jacques":2y2c9ypj said:I offered him a solution after I just spoke again to the original company who sold to me. Apparently they will now accept it as a return. Not sure why they changed their mind all of a sudden.
I told him I will return it as defective to where I originally purchased from, will have him ship there with RMA # on box, once I receive money he will get paid back.
He has not responded as of yet but yesterday he would respond within 30 seconds of me messaging him. I am about to say F it and let Reverb close my account.
You should have said the original company microscopically marks serial numbers on the unit and they are willing to take it back. That should wake him up if he's trying to scam you.
Phil Jacques":25p9p0qd said:boyedav":25p9p0qd said:This was your listing, right?
https://reverb.com/item/22694597-electr ... _sold=true
You failed to mention in your diatribe that you advertised your Used pedal as 'Brand New'. Reverb makes it pretty clear that this classification is for dealers/retailers. Used items in new condition would be 'Mint', not 'Brand New'. This has been covered before, and it's not like Reverb makes it hard to know this. That in and of itself would make your item not-as-described.
The buyer states the item doesn't work right and provides a video showing the issue, against your unsubstantiated claim that the item (whose condition you misstated) worked right a few days ago. The buyer's request for return sure seems justified, but you deny the request, so they file a dispute, and yet you're somehow confused about why Reverb sided with them.
You do have one thing right though: you should go ahead and have Reverb close your account.
Sorry Mr. Holier Than Thou. Didn't know you were perfect. Ill go ahead and bow to you for eternity.
boyedav":1curwrz4 said:Phil Jacques":1curwrz4 said:Sorry Mr. Holier Than Thou. Didn't know you were perfect. Ill go ahead and bow to you for eternity.
You're missing the point. Was the inaccuracy in your listing truly accidental? If you're an honest seller who made an honest mistake, then fucking own it. You seem to be expecting a benefit of doubt for yourself that you don't want anyone extending to your buyer.
The buyer has provided a video substantiating their claim, while you've provided nothing of substance to refute that. Your unsubstantiated claim that it worked several days ago doesn't really compare to a video of how it's working today. Oh sure, in your eyes it might, but that doesn't really matter unless you're expecting Reverb to hold you to a lesser standard of proof than the buyer. So you didn't accept their return, which would have been your best opportunity to examine the item and refute their claim with proof. Continuing to then push back against the buyer doesn't look like something an honest seller would do. On top of that, you misstated the condition in your listing. Even if an innocent mistake, taken with the totality of things it puts you at a disadvantage credibility-wise. You're probably a decent guy, but it sure seems like you're doing a really good job of being your own worst enemy, and wanting to blame others for it.
Oh, and that's Dr. Holier than Thou. I didn't spend 6 years in Holy school to be called 'Mister' ;-)
boyedav":2c6vd1us said:Phil Jacques":2c6vd1us said:[
Since you clearly lack reading comprehension skills I will spell it itnout again.
The pedal was brand new. I listed as such. Whether I am a dealer or not matters none. I purchased it 5 days earlier, had it for 2 days and sold it. If you buy a pedal NEW from Guitar Center that has been used by every tom dick and harry around, it's still treated as new.
Here's reading comprehension for ya:
I guess I'm no longer on the fence about whether your misstatement of the pedal's condition was an accident. You think the rules of listing somehow don't apply to you. You want a different standard of proof for your buyer than for yourself. Then you come onto RT to whine because Reverb won't stand in front of you. You're not a victim, you're just a shitty seller. Thanks for the warning about deadbeats though, lol.
It was not new by any definition. Especially, by the one set by the platform you used to sell on. By selling the item you agreed to the terms set by Reverb. Man up, take it back and relist it properly if it still works as you believe it does.Phil Jacques":2h0a4axx said:boyedav":2h0a4axx said:Phil Jacques":2h0a4axx said:[
Since you clearly lack reading comprehension skills I will spell it itnout again.
The pedal was brand new. I listed as such. Whether I am a dealer or not matters none. I purchased it 5 days earlier, had it for 2 days and sold it. If you buy a pedal NEW from Guitar Center that has been used by every tom dick and harry around, it's still treated as new.
Here's reading comprehension for ya:
I guess I'm no longer on the fence about whether your misstatement of the pedal's condition was an accident. You think the rules of listing somehow don't apply to you. You want a different standard of proof for your buyer than for yourself. Then you come onto RT to whine because Reverb won't stand in front of you. You're not a victim, you're just a shitty seller. Thanks for the warning about deadbeats though, lol.
Again I listed as new because to me it was. That was for sure an honest mistake.
I have however tried to continuously work with the guy. If I was a shitty seller, I wouldn't care enough to try. Just food for thought. If I didn't care I wouldn't have ever responded or spent my time the past two daus, trying to find a solution.
scottosan":2ow43e86 said:It was not new by any definition. Especially, by the one set by the platform you used to sell on. By selling the item you agreed to the terms set by Reverb. Man up, take it back and relist it properly if it still works as you believe it does.Phil Jacques":2ow43e86 said:boyedav":2ow43e86 said:Phil Jacques":2ow43e86 said:[
Since you clearly lack reading comprehension skills I will spell it itnout again.
The pedal was brand new. I listed as such. Whether I am a dealer or not matters none. I purchased it 5 days earlier, had it for 2 days and sold it. If you buy a pedal NEW from Guitar Center that has been used by every tom dick and harry around, it's still treated as new.
Here's reading comprehension for ya:
I guess I'm no longer on the fence about whether your misstatement of the pedal's condition was an accident. You think the rules of listing somehow don't apply to you. You want a different standard of proof for your buyer than for yourself. Then you come onto RT to whine because Reverb won't stand in front of you. You're not a victim, you're just a shitty seller. Thanks for the warning about deadbeats though, lol.
Again I listed as new because to me it was. That was for sure an honest mistake.
I have however tried to continuously work with the guy. If I was a shitty seller, I wouldn't care enough to try. Just food for thought. If I didn't care I wouldn't have ever responded or spent my time the past two daus, trying to find a solution.
Even if he wasn't having issues, he has the right to send back an item advertised as new that is lightly used
Oblivion DC":2ixz3acf said:Meh... If you don't sell much on Reverb and think you're being fucked with you should have told him to pound sand right at the start and closed your account. And never give a refund until your item is back in your hands and tested to be sure it still functions. Nothing like opening a return box and finding a brick after you've already given a full refund.
311splawndude":3o1dnidz said:I don't have a dog in this fight but a cursory review tells me Phil has a good buy/sell disposition at least on RT.
But I'm not clear on the 'scam'.
Is it that the Buyer would take your supposedly good pedal and swap it for his supposedly bad pedal and then send you his bad pedal as part of the 'return' process? Is that the suspected situation Phil?
Regardless, it sure seems like a lot of work for the both of you.![]()