I'll say it again...regardless of what part of the production of the Edwards is done in Japan, based on real experience they play quite well, noticeably better than LTD's in my experience. I own and have owned a number of ESP's at various price points (including Kiso shop, regular signature series, standard series, Edwards, higher end LTD's), the Edwards isn't going to feel like the custom shop. But I definitely noticed a playability difference going from the higher end LTD's to the Edwards, not to say some LTD's are not decent guitars (I own a couple of those I like as well). Edwards really does feel closer to the old standard series to me. If you are chasing playability versus Internet specs, they are worth a look.
I do agree if the bodies are made in China they should state that just to be transparent, but that wouldn't stop me from buying another one. Even if all of the production was/is in Japan, I'm not getting a "real ESP", but something that is cool for what it is. That's why I said earlier I wish they would have used the Edwards label instead of E-II, the favorable history is already there with Edwards. It's a simple cosmetic thing, but brand identity is built on perception, something I don't think ESP quite got right with American buyers with this change. I don't perceive the ESP brand as worth the top coin like I'd readily drop on something like a high end Gibson, even though Gibson is totally gouging me price wise (not saying ESP aren't comparable in actual quality, I just don't think they have the history/pedigree). ESP was always just an alternative to a Jackson for me, a nice $1500-2500 guitar to play heavy metal on. I liked dabbling in the higher end stuff they had, but psychologically it is not in my brain that ESP is a high end boutique first and foremost, even if that was the history of the brand in Japan and where they now want to steer the ship here in the USA.