Fossil Fuels exist on other planets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Laputan Machine
  • Start date Start date
Like the current English Bible uses the word Earth, but what was it translated from is my question I guess
"Adamah" in hebrew is translated as "earth" or "ground". The name of the first man is Adam, because he was made from the earth. Indeed, science shows us that soil, earth, contains all the elements necessary to form a human body of flesh.
 
I have long wanted a nice telescope. I wanted to build a crows nest with seating for hunting and astronomical observation.

I have access to this which is nice

IMG_7566.jpeg
 
I have access to this which is nice

View attachment 280022
My point was even with the increased detail and clarity you can’t know what you’re seeing. The only reason you know what you see when you look through a telescope here in Earth is because you’ve already encountered that object or similar in person and can make that connection. You’ve never encountered any of these heavenly bodies at a scale you can comprehend so you can’t properly identify them. It’s theoretical. If they told you that you were seeing something else you couldn’t argue otherwise based on the images themselves.
 
My point was even with the increased detail and clarity you can’t know what you’re seeing. The only reason you know what you see when you look through a telescope here in Earth is because you’ve already encountered that object or similar in person and can make that connection. You’ve never encountered any of these heavenly bodies at a scale you can comprehend so you can’t properly identify them. It’s theoretical. If they told you that you were seeing something else you couldn’t argue otherwise based on the images themselves.

What’s theoretical about it? We know exactly where it is at any second, and can look at it.
You can sometimes see Saturn with the naked eye, then look at it through binoculars and see a bit more, then a telescope and see it even better. I’m not sure how much more real it could be
 
Have you ever looked through a decent telescope at the moon even?
Sure. I’ve spent time at the observatory at Bruneau Dunes Idaho. One of the darkest places in North America. Saw Saturns rings, the Pleides and tons of other cool shit from their massive Planewave CDK 700.
I saw the rings of Saturn last month through my much more modest telescope. Hell, I saw them 3-4 months ago with a Bushnell Elite 6500 rifle scope.

As for calculating the distance to various objects in space, it seems a bit like carbon dating. That is a leap of faith is necessary to trust the conclusion 100%, however, the Mars Rover proved we are in the right ballpark.
 
Sure. I’ve spent time at the observatory at Bruneau Dunes Idaho. One of the darkest places in North America. Saw Saturns rings, the Pleides and tons of other cool shit from their massive Planewave CDK 700.
I saw the rings of Saturn last month through my much more modest telescope. Hell, I saw them 3-4 months ago with a Bushnell Elite 6500 rifle scope.

As for calculating the distance to various objects in space, it seems a bit like carbon dating. That is a leap of faith is necessary to trust the conclusion 100%, however, the Mars Rover proved we are in the right ballpark.
I maintain you have no conclusive basis for knowing what you're looking at. Your only "proof" is offered by sketchy NASA. Otherwise it's just speculation, perhaps well founded on other calculations, but still not confirmed.
 
I maintain you have no conclusive basis for knowing what you're looking at. Your only "proof" is offered by sketchy NASA. Otherwise it's just speculation, perhaps well founded on other calculations, but still not confirmed.
people have been looking at and identifying moons and planets way before NASA
 
lol if seeing something with your own eyes is theoretical, then sure dude
Again, the question is what exactly are you seeing. You are certainly seeing something with your own eyes, I'll give you that.
 
Again, the question is what exactly are you seeing. You are certainly seeing something with your own eyes, I'll give you that.
yea, the same thing every single time, regardless of who is looking at it.

read up on the discovery of Neptune. It wasn't an accident. People noticed patterns in Uranus that would really only be explained by there being another planet passed it, they did some math, pointed a telescope and holy shit, there was Neptune. Theory meet theorem
 
read up on the discovery of Neptune. It wasn't an accident. People noticed patterns in Uranus that would really only be explained by there being another planet passed it, they did some math, pointed a telescope and holy shit, there was Neptune. Theory meet theorem
Well, that's good support for the theory isn't it.
 
Circular logic or should i say spherical ?
don't be retarded dude. if you use math to create a theory, then use physical human observation to prove it, it's not a theory anymore. It's a theorem. It's not circular, it's as dead simple as it could possibly be
 
Back
Top