France is burning to the ground......pray for Paris 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[Uzi Nein Millimetah]

Isn't Macron the dude who is married to a ugly woman 20 years his senior that used to be his "teacher" and is actually a dude? If I wrote a dystopian sci-fi novel I couldn't come up with that kinda crap.

Evidently, you can get in VERY hot water in Europe for even repeating that rumor. I think that speaks for itself.

 

[VonBonfire]

Evidently, you can get in VERY hot water in Europe for even repeating that rumor. I think that speaks for itself.

So explain to me why it was worth bailing them out of two world wars. Neither the larger portion of their citizenry nor their leaders seem capable of maintaining good governance.

 

[Shevek]

Our culture (well most of us) originates from Europe. If it is erased in the home countries, it's not coming back. That's the destruction of our culture, not to mention it would result in millions of deaths and slavery and sex trafficking. It's not acceptable. We're capable of doing something. To do nothing would be like sitting on the subway and watch a young girl slaughtered by some ORC and not even looking over, or worse, filming it. We're better than that. It's also not acceptable for the imported Third World ORCS to do the same here.

You're the imported orc.

 

[Uzi Nein Millimetah]

So explain to me why it was worth bailing them out of two world wars. Neither the larger portion of their citizenry nor their leaders seem capable of maintaining good governance.

They don't deserve to be rescued, but still should be, provided we call some shots afterward as we did for years to a significant degree after the conclusion of WWII in Europe and Japan. In a perfect world, in the case of France and the UK, we would remove their failed commie leaders and install new ones aligned with preserving European culture and democratic principles. Le Pen is an obvious choice to head France, although I'm not sure about the UK and others off the top, not many great choices.

 

[CDawg]

 

[Uzi Nein Millimetah]

View attachment 463235

 

[VonBonfire]

They don't deserve to be rescued, but still should be, provided we call some shots afterward as we did for years to a significant degree after the conclusion of WWII in Europe and Japan. In a perfect world, in the case of France and the UK, we would remove their failed commie leaders and install new ones aligned with preserving European culture and democratic principles. Le Pen is an obvious choice to head France, although I'm not sure about the UK and others off the top, not many great choices.

So you think it was worth the 200 billion US tax dollars being funneled into the UN to defend Europe while they payed relatively little by comparison for their own defense? We lost 400k Americans in WWII and about 120k in WWI. Think of the social damage, destroyed families, loss of skilled workers, etc etc. The fallout from those events was massive and not at all worth it IMO, especially in light of how they have run things since then.

 

[Uzi Nein Millimetah]

So you think it was worth the 200 billion US tax dollars being funneled into the UN to defend Europe while they payed relatively little by comparison for their own defense? We lost 400k Americans in WWII and about 120k in WWI. Think of the social damage, destroyed families, loss of skilled workers, etc etc. The fallout from those events was massive and not at all worth it IMO, especially in light of how they have run things since then.

I think it was worthwhile to take the lead in WWII, yes. And I am also 1000% certain it was worthwhile for the United States to develop atomic weapons FIRST. We wouldn't have done that if we have cucked out during WWII, but someone was going to crack the code eventually, the Nazis may well have done it or otherwise the Soviets would have.

The Russians lost 27 million. We cannot imagine that kind of loss and don't have the stomach for it. We were the lone country on Planet Earth capable of keeping the Soviets in check after 1945.

 

[VonBonfire]

I think it was worthwhile to take the lead in WWII, yes. And I am also 1000% certain it was worthwhile for the United States to develop atomic weapons FIRST. We wouldn't have done that if we have cucked out during WWII, but someone was going to crack the code eventually, the Nazis may well have done it or otherwise the Soviets would have.

The Russians lost 27 million. We cannot imagine that kind of loss and don't have the stomach for it. We were the lone country on Planet Earth capable of keeping the Soviets in check after 1945.

Fair enough even though I don't believe n00ks exist in the way we are told.

 

[watson503]

 

[Shevek]

GoD cReAtEd HoWiTzErS

 

[demondestroyer]

People believe anything once it's tossed onto a tv set. I don't understand that mentality but it's a thing in the west. TV=pure lies.

Thats why they call it ' programming and tell a vision'

 

[70 Mach 1]

Theyre just coping the shit we do.

 

[Floyd Eye]

https://apple.news/ATclPoYEsQC-DMgJfDrQnZg

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

You probably still think 2 airplanes took down the twin towers and a plane hit the pentagon.

You are what we call a clear head, just admit it.

I'd like to follow up on this. Are you game?

First just to be super, super clear so that we start from the same place I have to ask - do you or do you not think that 2 planes hit the towers and another hit the Pentagon? In other words, were there actually planes involved during 9-11? I'm pretty sure you do but just the way your sentence was worded it could possibly be read both ways and I wanted to establish that fact.

I'm pretty sure you meant that the planes weren't the only reason the towers came down and that there were other controlled explosions partly/mostly responsible for the collapse. Is that correct?

More to come from me if you choose to reply.

 

[Shevek]

derka derka "french citizens" dirk dirk

View attachment 463217

No, this photo is not from a protest in France.
The image actually depicts British-Egyptian YouTuber and influencer Mohammed Hijab along with a crowd of men in Leicester, England during September 2022.

 

[Geo]

I'd like to follow up on this. Are you game?

First just to be super, super clear so that we start from the same place I have to ask - do you or do you not think that 2 planes hit the towers and another hit the Pentagon? In other words, were there actually planes involved during 9-11? I'm pretty sure you do but just the way your sentence was worded it could possibly be read both ways and I wanted to establish that fact.

I'm pretty sure you meant that the planes weren't the only reason the towers came down and that there were other controlled explosions partly/mostly responsible for the collapse. Is that correct?

More to come from me if you choose to reply.

That was not a passenger plane that hit the pentagon.

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

That was not a passenger plane that hit the pentagon.

What kind of plane was it?

Are you saying there was only 1 plane? I don't think you are but read literally, that's what your sentence said. Sorry to be so nit picky about this ...

 

[Geo]

What kind of plane was it?

Are you saying there was only 1 plane? I don't think you are but read literally, that's what your sentence said. Sorry to be so nit picky about this ...

Follow me here clear head. 2 passenger planes hit the twin towers.

I don't know what it was that hit the pentagon, but it wasn't a passenger p[lane.

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

Ok, gotcha. You're right, my coffee hasn't kicked in, I misread you there.

Sticking with the twin towers for now, do you think that the planes and fuel aboard were insufficient to bring down the towers?