Let's take the foot off the gas for a moment.. yes it is true that I hear the signature Friedman mids in a lot of the demos which just don't do it for me. To each their own, but how much fun would this forum be if we all licked the same ice cream from the same cone all the time?? (eesh, that sounded a little...... akward)
I have three Friedman modules for my Randall Lynch box and I really like two of them. Brahma is fantastic, so is the Mr. Scary. I have the judge/GTO which is the closest to the BE in tone and vibe and it has those mids which i find soft/hollow. So the BE is not for me. I guess it pisses you guys off when I mention it but we also sit through countless BE jizz posts so i think it is fair to balance them out. Some of you guys take it personally. I don't usually get bent out of shape if someone tells me JCM800's are the worst amps in the world and Mesa's rule for example..
So what does interest me from Friedman? I think the smallbox has a different sound and sounds much better to my ears. The Dirty Shirley I think I hear more openess and rawness. The tube pedal that he came out with at NAMM sounded much better and more complex to my ears than the BE100 pedal. The pedal in the demo sounds a lot like the 5150 did... pedal gain and tons of it. I like Pete's overdrive/booster demos and just about any amp he puts up there. I don't feel the distortion boxes sound as good as the real deal (thoughthe CM sounded pretty good) and I think the modelers like Axe or Line 6 fall short in his demos. In all his mixes, everything sounds good and is passable. So really, all our opinions can essentially be mixed and thrown into a blender because come mix time, anything can sit right if the person behind the desk mixes it in properly.
Hope that clears it up without shitting too much on the party... guarantee we will see just as many of these pop up for sale within a month just like we see amps popping up for sale 2 days after a stellar review from some of our fellow forumites.