God bless Donald J Trump appreciation thread

[TheGreatGreen]

Deflection,delfection,deflection

You can list it or just keep proving the fact that you're a just another cock sucking troll.
But you already know that.....don't you?

I already did in this thread you lazy fucking retard hahaha. Check my posts in this thread if you want to find it.

Do you often forget about things the moment they exit your direct field of view?

 

[Findthetone1]

hahaha what a retarded qualifier. "When it comes to something left wing people are mad about and conservatives like then what's the ratio of violence then hmmmm"

That's like saying "hey who is richer, me or every billionaire on the planet? Well yeah but what about when it comes to only people who live in my house? Welp looks like I'm the richest person ever according to my brilliant qualifier that makes the entire question meaningless" loool.

But actually it's still WAY higher on the conservative side, even with your idiotic qualifier, considering how violent the ICE agents constantly get. Woops.

It's called relevance, you smooth brained cum guzzler.

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

So no one here ever said that they like child rapists? Another yes or no question gone unanswered?
Furthermore, when did i ever say that i loved DJT?

You're trying to play word games.

Stage 3 of grief - bargaining.

I know that for some of you, no amount of evidence will ever get you to admit that Trump raped children. That's your problem to deal with and however you do it is no matter to me.

 

[JDs Couch]

I already did in this thread you lazy fucking retard hahaha. Check my posts in this thread if you want to find it.

Do you often forget about things the moment they exit your direct field of view?

MAGAs are like goldfish.

 

[Robostyle]

But actually it's still WAY higher on the conservative side

What do you think the ratio is?

 

[Findthetone1]

I already did in this thread you lazy fucking retard hahaha. Check my posts in this thread if you want to find it.

Do you often forget about things the moment they exit your direct field of view?

So, you don't have shit. Got it.
You think I'd click a link your dumbass posts?

 

[TheGreatGreen]

I asked a more specific question, thinking it would be easier for you to answer.
You posted a video of an ICE riot.
I asked your opinion on the ratio of violence with your video as an example.
Instead of giving your opinion on the subject, you changed the subject to suit your agenda, and then accuse me of moving goalposts?
Right out if the liberal playbook- accuse others of what you are actually doing.
You don't want honest discussion, this much is clear.

I'm sorry I have to explain to you how human conversation and interactions work.

I presented data, and with your "but what about only ICE protests" question, you effectively asked "but what about if we forget every bit of data except the data I think supports my view" which is, I mean 100% on brand for people like you, but put in those terms, do you understand why I refused to engage directly with such a retarded and biased qualifying question?

As for the video I posted, I just want to point out for the record that you are incapable of separating the "violence" of "an adult man exiting his truck unprovoked to punch a high school girl for standing on the sidewalk protesting something he didn't like" and the "violence" of the other high school students rushing to her defense, and then claiming because there was more than one defender, that there were "more individual instances of violence on the left which means the left is 'more' violent" in that case. You are truly sick.

The pattern holds though. People show one maga or a group of them doing literally anything, up to and including the most deplorable human behavior imaginable, and as long as it's being committed by one of their own, other magas will unquestionably leap to defend it. Disgusting.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

So, you don't have shit. Got it.
You think I'd click a link you're dumbass posts?

"I'm too lazy to use the search button which means YOU'RE wrong" loooool

 

[Findthetone1]

You're trying to play word games.

Stage 3 of grief - bargaining.

I know that for some of you, no amount of evidence will ever get you to admit that Trump raped children. That's your problem to deal with and however you do it is no matter to me.

So YOU have proof?

 

[TheGreatGreen]

So, you don't have shit. Got it.
You think I'd click a link your dumbass posts?

Just to move this along, the links are in this document, which I linked earlier in the thread on page 48, sweet thang:

https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/118612/documents/HHRG-119-JU00-20250917-SD057-U57.pdf

 

[Findthetone1]

"I'm too lazy to use the search button which means YOU'RE wrong" loooool

You said it's in the link, which I'm disinclined to click because I really don't want to be taken to the double-dildo webstore you do your Christmas shopping.
If you truly had facts, you would just tell me.
Continue on with your trolling, cocksucker.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

You said it's in the link, which I'm disinclined to click because I really don't want to be taken to the double-dildo webstore you do your Christmas shopping.
If you truly had facts, you would just tell me.
Continue on with your trolling, cocksucker.

The link is to "congress.gov"

I went over the facts of that source earlier in the thread.

Thank you for conceding the argument and admitting defeat. It's obvious the link is safe so your only tactic is to stall because you've got nothing. Have a good day.

 

[Findthetone1]

The link is to "congress.gov"

I went over the facts of that source earlier in the thread.

Thank you for conceding the argument and admitting defeat. It's obvious the link is safe so your only tactic is to stall because you've got nothing. Have a good day.

So again, you have nothing and are full of shit.
Troll on.........cocksucker

 

[TheGreatGreen]

So again, you have nothing and are full of shit.
Troll on.........cocksucker

Closing your eyes and putting your fingers in your ears and going LALALA I CAN'T SEE ANY DATA SO IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS NONE certainly is a choice you can make lol.

Unfortunately it also shows everybody else reading this what an idiot child you are lol.

 

[Robostyle]

You're trying to play word games.

You are claiming that members here love child rape.
I am asking you to back up those claims, which you seem unable to do.
And then you accuse me of playing "word games"? Lmfao.
Another case of liberals accusing others of what they are doing.
Either admit you are lying or STFU already.

 

[Findthetone1]

Closing your eyes and putting your fingers in your ears and going LALALA I CAN'T SEE ANY DATA SO IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS NONE certainly is a choice you can make lol.

Unfortunately it also shows everybody else reading this what an idiot child you are lol.

Derp....
We now join our regularly scheduled trolling already in progress...by a cocksucker.

 

[RGX_Custom]

So stupid and unoriginal, you have to steal my line. What a pathetic sad twat you are

You sound very triggered also...need a hug there Findtheboner1?

 

[Findthetone1]

You sound very triggered also...need a hug there Findtheboner1?

Lame, weak and still unoriginal.
I understand you don't know what to say unless instructed by your handlers at the MSM, but could you at least show a LITTLE effort?

 

[MadAsAHatter]

I'm quoting this for record because it's the most fucking retarded thing I've seen today hahahaha. "KKK and neo-nazis aren't far right" hahahahahhaha what the fuck. aaaaahahahahahaha you really don't live in reality at all.

Hey let me ask you... who did the KKK and the neo-nazi's officially support last election hmmm?

https://www.reuters.com/article/wor...per-declares-support-for-trump-idUSKBN12X2ID/


I also love the logical fallacy:

Without using propaganda or memes please explain to me how neo-nazis and the KKK are right wing.

 

[Robostyle]

I'm sorry I have to explain to you how human conversation and interactions work.

I presented data, and with your "but what about only ICE protests" question, you effectively asked "but what about if we forget every bit of data except the data I think supports my view" which is, I mean 100% on brand for people like you, but put in those terms, do you understand why I refused to engage directly with such a retarded and biased qualifying question?

As for the video I posted, I just want to point out for the record that you are incapable of separating the "violence" of "an adult exiting his truck unprovoked to punch a high school girl for standing on the sidewalk protesting something he didn't like" and the "violence" of the other high school students rushing to her defense, and then claiming because there was more than one defender, that there were "more individual instances of violence on the left which means the left is 'more' violent" in that case. You are truly sick.

The pattern holds though. People show one maga or a group of them doing literally anything, up to and including the most deplorable human behavior imaginable, and as long as it's being committed by one of their own, other magas will unquestionably leap to defend it. Disgusting.

Again with the rambling bullshit. I asked you a simple question, now here we are 3 pages later and you have virtue signaled and bloviated your way through without ever answering it.
Isn't it about time for you to run away in a big bitch fit?