God bless Donald J Trump appreciation thread

[TheGreatGreen]

Again with the rambling bullshit. I asked you a simple question, now here we are 3 pages later and you have virtue signaled and bloviated your way through without ever answering it.
Isn't it about time for you to run away in a big bitch fit?

I'm truly sorry you are unable to understand human thought.

My deepest condolences to your parents.

edit: lol

 

[Robostyle]

I'm truly sorry you are unable to understand human thought.

My deepest condolences to your parents.

edit: lol

Better watch what you say, families are off limits here at rig-talk.
If i report this, chances are you'll get you limp wrist slapped.
You want to edit this?

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Here's one far you. Snip of the AXIOS article title and link to the paper.
Note on the chart that in all cases except '96, '97, & '98 domestic terror attacks were higher for left-wing.
I also want to point out that this study defined right-wing terror as:

"Right-wing terrorism as used in this analysis includes incidents motivated by ideas of racial or ethnic supremacy; opposition to government authority, believing it is tyrannical and illegitimate; misogyny, including incels; hatred based on sexuality or gender identity; belief in the QAnon conspiracy theory; opposition to abortion; or partisan extremism, where violence is justified against political opponents and parties perceived as advancing left-wing agendas."

All of which are not tenants of right-wing ideologies. Which means the results are skewed to begin with. Even still, it shows left wing terror attacks have been on the rise while righg-wing terror attacks are in sharp decline

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazon...df?VersionId=IgPZeUizVsrCEeeO1gMvqILMPl27qE5d

 

[TheGreatGreen]

Better watch what you say, families are off limits here at rig-talk.
If i report this, chances are you'll get you limp wrist slapped.
You want to edit this?

Good thing I didn't insult his parents then isn't it. On the contrary I wished them support and goodwill.

Also "threatening" to report somebody is the most bitchmade thing you can possibly do on a forum.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

Here's one far you. Snip of the AXIOS article title and link to the paper.
Note on the chart that in all cases except '96, '97, & '98 domestic terror attacks were higher for left-wing.

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazon...df?VersionId=IgPZeUizVsrCEeeO1gMvqILMPl27qE5d


View attachment 431822

Ok I'll just respond like you've responded in this thread: Those people aren't real leftists so it doesn't count.

Or how Robostyle would respond: Oh yeah well what if we only consider times when the people on the left weren't violent? Welp looks like the right is more violent in that case.

Or how Finethetone1 would respond: That's not real evidence, where is your real proof? I personally choose not to acknowledge it so it's not real.

Or how NoHassle would respond: Nuh-uh. There, I win.

Or how The Blazing Saddle would respond: Oh TheGreatGreen I love your Suhr clips so much, brother! Please give me guitar and tone lessons right now! I'll do anything!

Sorry troll.

 

[RGX_Custom]

Better watch what you say, families are off limits here at rig-talk.
If i report this, chances are you'll get you limp wrist slapped.
You want to edit this?

Is Robostylish a great big tattletale?

 

[Findthetone1]

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Ok I'll just respond like you've responded in this thread: Those people aren't real leftists so it doesn't count.

Or how Robostyle would respond: Oh yeah well what if we only consider times when the people on the left weren't violent? Welp looks like the right is more violent in that case.

Or how Finethetone1 would respond: That's not real evidence, where is your real proof? I personally choose not to acknowledge it so it's not real.

Or how NoHassle would respond: Nuh-uh. There, I win.

Or how Blazing Saddle would respond: Oh TheGreatGreen I love your Suhr clips so much, brother! Please give me guitar and tone lessons right now! I'll do anything!

Sorry troll.

Holy crap dude! If you even skimmed the study (which IMO is heavily biased) you would have seen that it actually tries to paint the left in a positive light compared to the right. But, nope you're gonna prove yourself a fucking moron with some dumbass incoherent response instead of a rational discussion like you're always claiming to want. .

Edit, Are you going to explain to me how the KKK and neo-nazis are right wing or will you just gloss over that too?

 

[JDs Couch]

The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is widely identified by historians, sociologists, and researchers as a far-right extremist group, defined by white supremacy, racism, anti-Catholicism, nativism, and anti-immigrant sentiment. Founded in 1865, it advocates for extreme, nationalistic, and reactionary political positions often placed on the far-right end of the political spectrum.

Neo-Nazis are considered to be on the far-right of the political spectrum. They are classified as a form of right-wing extremism.
Key points regarding the political placement of neo-Nazis include:
Ideological Basis: Neo-Nazism is a post-World War II movement seeking to revive the ideology of Nazism, which includes white supremacy, racial nationalism, anti-Semitism, xenophobia, homophobia, and ant-communism.
Far-Right Alignment: Neo-Nazism is generally understood to be a sub-type of far-right politics or extreme right-wing ideology.
Opposition to the Left: Historically and in their current forms, Nazi-influenced movements target the political left for elimination and are diametrically opposed to socialism and communism.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

Here's one far you. Snip of the AXIOS article title and link to the paper.
Note on the chart that in all cases except '96, '97, & '98 domestic terror attacks were higher for left-wing.
I also want to point out that this study defined right-wing terror as:

"Right-wing terrorism as used in this analysis includes incidents motivated by ideas of racial or ethnic supremacy; opposition to government authority, believing it is tyrannical and illegitimate; misogyny, including incels; hatred based on sexuality or gender identity; belief in the QAnon conspiracy theory; opposition to abortion; or partisan extremism, where violence is justified against political opponents and parties perceived as advancing left-wing agendas."

All of which are not tenants of right-wing ideologies. Which means the results are skewed to begin with. Even still, it shows left wing terror attacks have been on the rise while righg-wing terror attacks are in sharp decline

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazon...df?VersionId=IgPZeUizVsrCEeeO1gMvqILMPl27qE5d


View attachment 431822

Ok I took a look at it.

First of all that grey and orange graph looks to be deliberately confusing. It is implied to be the left and right attacks overlayed on top of each other to make it look like the left edges out almost every year. It's the opposite, it's that the exclusively right (grey) and exclusively left (orange) numbers are simply stacked, not overlapping.

Here's another graph from that document. Note the green arrow highlighting the inflection point that shows where the left was supposedly "outpacing" the right last year:

To imply this data means "the left is more violent now" is pretty much like saying a 450 lb man "consumes less food" than a 78 lb elderly woman because yesterday the elderly woman ate soup, while the 450 lb man happened to not eat anything because he was no longer able to walk to the kitchen on his own.


Right wing extremists are by far more violent than left wing extremists. It's not even close.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is widely identified by historians, sociologists, and researchers as a far-right extremist group, defined by white supremacy, racism, anti-Catholicism, nativism, and anti-immigrant sentiment. Founded in 1865, it advocates for extreme, nationalistic, and reactionary political positions often placed on the far-right end of the political spectrum.

Neo-Nazis are considered to be on the far-right of the political spectrum. They are classified as a form of right-wing extremism.
Key points regarding the political placement of neo-Nazis include:
Ideological Basis: Neo-Nazism is a post-World War II movement seeking to revive the ideology of Nazism, which includes white supremacy, racial nationalism, anti-Semitism, xenophobia, homophobia, and ant-communism.
Far-Right Alignment: Neo-Nazism is generally understood to be a sub-type of far-right politics or extreme right-wing ideology.
Opposition to the Left: Historically and in their current forms, Nazi-influenced movements target the political left for elimination and are diametrically opposed to socialism and communism.

Nice try with the Google AI answer.
White supremacy, racism, anti-Catholicism, nativism, racial nationalism, anti-Semitism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. are an imposed definition by the left and are not tenants or right-wing ideology.

 

[JDs Couch]

Nice try with the Google AI answer.
White supremacy, racism, anti-Catholicism, nativism, racial nationalism, anti-Semitism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. are an imposed definition by the left and are not tenants or right-wing ideology.

Lol, you're hilarious and pathetic. Give me your attempt to show how these groups are leftist, I'll wait.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Ok I took a look at it.

First of all that grey and orange graph looks to be deliberately confusing. It is implied to be the left and right attacks overlayed on top of each other to make it look like the left edges out almost every year. I think it's the opposite, it's that the exclusively right (grey) and exclusively left (orange) numbers are simply stacked, not overlapping. Here's another graph from that document:

Right wing extremists are by far more violent than left wing extremists. It's not even close.

And still it shows a an increase in violence by the left over the last 10 years.
Plus the definition of right-wing that was used is incorrect.

"Right-wing terrorism as used in this analysis includes incidents motivated by ideas of racial or ethnic supremacy; opposition to government authority, believing it is tyrannical and illegitimate; misogyny, including incels; hatred based on sexuality or gender identity; belief in the QAnon conspiracy theory; opposition to abortion; or partisan extremism, where violence is justified against political opponents and parties perceived as advancing left-wing agendas."

None of this is aligned with right-wing ideology. It's a definition forced by the left.

 

[Findthetone1]

Ok I took a look at it.

First of all that grey and orange graph looks to be deliberately confusing. It is implied to be the left and right attacks overlayed on top of each other to make it look like the left edges out almost every year. I think it's the opposite, it's that the exclusively right (grey) and exclusively left (orange) numbers are simply stacked, not overlapping. Here's another graph from that document. Note the green inflection point that shows where the left is supposedly "outpacing" the right last year:

To imply this data means "the left is more violent now" is pretty much like saying a 450 lb man "consumes less food" than a 78 lb elderly woman because yesterday the elderly woman ate soup, while the 450 lb man happened to not eat anything because he was no longer able to walk to the kitchen on his own.


Right wing extremists are by far more violent than left wing extremists. It's not even close.

Were. Try and stay current, Corky. You sure sound like you like to justify violence.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Lol, you're hilarious and pathetic. Give me your attempt to show how these groups are leftist, I'll wait.

I didn't say they were left-wing dipshit. I said those groups do not hold right-wing ideology.
If you had any semblance of comprehension you would understand that not right does not automatically mean left.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

And still it shows a an increase in violence by the left over the last 10 years.

Considering the practically mountainous, exponentially higher graph of also steadily increasing right wing violence juxtaposed right there against the left wing violence trend in that very same graph, surely you can see how it's hard to take what you just said seriously. I'm not discounting any violence of any kind, but to see that graph and try to read the point of it being specifically that it's the left who is increasingly violent feels like a statement that is nothing short of being totally cherry picking and disingenuous.

Plus the definition of right-wing that was used is incorrect.

"Right-wing terrorism as used in this analysis includes incidents motivated by ideas of racial or ethnic supremacy; opposition to government authority, believing it is tyrannical and illegitimate; misogyny, including incels; hatred based on sexuality or gender identity; belief in the QAnon conspiracy theory; opposition to abortion; or partisan extremism, where violence is justified against political opponents and parties perceived as advancing left-wing agendas."

None of this is aligned with right-wing ideology. It's a definition forced by the left.

Whether or not those aspects of right-wing idealism were identified by the left doesn't make them any less true. They're all aspects of right wing extremism, like it or not. Implying they're not is just another No True Scotsman fallacy.

 

[Findthetone1]

None of this is aligned with right-wing ideology. It's a definition forced by the left.

The problem is that MSM has purposely blurred the lines between conservatism and far right extremism by intentionally labeling anything and everything that goes again their narrative as "far-right". There have always been the fringe groups, but prior to about 2015, they were shrinking and not very active.
The paid for leftist activism such as BLM and Pantifa going into cities and destroying areas did nothing but reignite interest in fringe group recruiting.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

The problem is that MSM has purposely blurred the lines between conservatism and far right extremism by intentionally labeling anything and everything that goes again their narrative as "far-right". There have always been the fringe groups, but prior to about 2015, they were shrinking and not very active.

Hahaha hmmm I wonder what in the US political landscape changed around 2016 or so to bring out all the fringe crazies.

The paid for leftist activism such as BLM and Pantifa going into cities and destroying areas did nothing but reignite interest in fringe group recruiting.

Oh so now we're doing crazypants conspiracy nonsense huh. Wow.

 

[The Blazing Saddle]

TheGreatGreenFlamingHomosexual and Inbred Beta Phoney Iommi are a great tag team. They both are infatuated with Jeffrey, I wonder why?

P.S. How many more times will TheGreatGreenFlamingHomosexual storm out and come back? What a fucking faggot!

 

[MadAsAHatter]

The problem is that MSM has purposely blurred the lines between conservatism and far right extremism by intentionally labeling anything and everything that goes again their narrative as "far-right". There have always been the fringe groups, but prior to about 2015, they were shrinking and not very active.
The paid for leftist activism such as BLM and Pantifa going into cities and destroying areas did nothing but reignite interest in fringe group recruiting.

Not only that, but the fringe left has basically taken over the democratic party which further blurs the lines. When they're ready to oust John Fetterman and Bill Mahar you know the plot has been lost. Hell, they even consider the likes of Tim Pool far right and he most certainly isn't.