R
Rogue":21u5hs8m said:
tweed":31x62jls said:Mentoneman has an AxeFX in his possession.![]()
bobby s!Bob Savage":2rogzs1e said:tweed":2rogzs1e said:Mentoneman has an AxeFX in his possession.![]()
Was just a matter of time...
Well?mentoneman":3mof7uz4 said:tomorrow should be FUN![]()
Rogue":396wwbd4 said:It was wet as hell, but the basic amp tone was thick, delicious Marshall tone. I'd like to see if any of these modelers can get that girthy, solid-like tone.ejecta":396wwbd4 said:Zach's "No More Tears" tone has chorus on it.![]()
Rogue":1tqyrr0t said:Well?mentoneman":1tqyrr0t said:tomorrow should be FUN![]()
Fun indeed!Rogue":1n8bgxwd said:Well?mentoneman":1n8bgxwd said:tomorrow should be FUN![]()
You----shut up!ejecta":3s5gb2jw said:Dude give him time to dig through the gazillion parameters and find his tone....... jeez.![]()
I'm just yanking your chains.....and also trying to dig into first impressions. There are a lot of tone serious tone people that are happy with the Axe. I guess I'm still on the "really?" side...at the same time in the market to try it out. 80-90% "realism" is close enough for me, for sure. At the same time, I wonder if in the future I might feel something lacking.....but that doesn't seem to be the case with long time AF users. Alternatively, you know how fanboys are. I'm trying to get some info between skeptic and fanboy from you....you know, when it's still objective.mentoneman":txsk75sp said:Fun indeed!Rogue":txsk75sp said:Well?mentoneman":txsk75sp said:tomorrow should be FUN![]()
As far as Zack tone goes,
I'm not the right guy to ask. I did pull up the jcm800 model and got a raunchy dry tone,
but one thing that remains the variable is what the axe is connected to.
I'm using a tech 21 1x12 powered cab and a mackie studio monitor.
and a Tyler strat. The axe is powerful but it's not a genie granting me magic wishes.
I tried the presonus in front of the axe and the only model that benefitted was the dumble.
Haven't made it far enough to experiment with the loop of the axe yet.
All of the dirty tones love being hit by the Hermida dual boost.
I was hoping my tone press compressor would do the same for the clean tones but no dice.
So far I have dialed in a clean fender with verb that is great sounding even though the tube bounce and valve compression isn't as dynamic as the real thing.
But it comes across as a well produced fender tone through effects as heard in the control room through monitors.
I also have a nasty dirty fender tone hit with a drive pedal I'm dialing in.
It's going well!
Rogue":46txf4p2 said:I'm just yanking your chains.....and also trying to dig into first impressions. There are a lot of tone serious tone people that are happy with the Axe. I guess I'm still on the "really?" side...at the same time in the market to try it out. 80-90% "realism" is close enough for me, for sure. At the same time, I wonder if in the future I might feel something lacking.....but that doesn't seem to be the case with long time AF users. Alternatively, you know how fanboys are. I'm trying to get some info between skeptic and fanboy from you....you know, when it's still objective.mentoneman":46txf4p2 said:Fun indeed!Rogue":46txf4p2 said:Well?mentoneman":46txf4p2 said:tomorrow should be FUN![]()
As far as Zack tone goes,
I'm not the right guy to ask. I did pull up the jcm800 model and got a raunchy dry tone,
but one thing that remains the variable is what the axe is connected to.
I'm using a tech 21 1x12 powered cab and a mackie studio monitor.
and a Tyler strat. The axe is powerful but it's not a genie granting me magic wishes.
I tried the presonus in front of the axe and the only model that benefitted was the dumble.
Haven't made it far enough to experiment with the loop of the axe yet.
All of the dirty tones love being hit by the Hermida dual boost.
I was hoping my tone press compressor would do the same for the clean tones but no dice.
So far I have dialed in a clean fender with verb that is great sounding even though the tube bounce and valve compression isn't as dynamic as the real thing.
But it comes across as a well produced fender tone through effects as heard in the control room through monitors.
I also have a nasty dirty fender tone hit with a drive pedal I'm dialing in.
It's going well!![]()
manyaxes":96i0l6yu said:I think the tech21 is influencing your opinion on the axe, and I don't think it is a great amp (but I could be mistaken), I don't even know if you have to keep the cabinet sims thru it. I mean you're hearing the axe thru an active guitar cab with its own sound, that is going to colour what the axe is producing. But then you try to compare it to various sounds and feeling you've gotten from several tube amps plus their cabinets (or combos). And if you play thru monitors, you should expect them to sound like a miced tube amp from the control room, which can be a quite different feeling.
If you want an apples to apples comparison, I would get your bogner or whatever head you're familiar with, and A/B it with an axe + a good solid state poweramp, all thru your guitar cabinet of choice. If you do it correctly, after a few tweaks you should get them sounding and feeling VERY close. That is the moment when most people realize its power (and sell all their tube gear).
Some people are able to get a FRFR monitor or a PA sounding just like a real guitar cabinet, but that takes more work and/or skill. Some people don't get it exactly the same, but actually prefer the PA sound. YMMV.
Digital Jams":2an56dtw said:Well this will be the most poetic evaluation of the axefx we have ever seen, this much I do know.
.........as I entered the crystal caverns of promise and purity in search of tonal nirvana I bid farewell to kings and queens with the intention of not returning to the fields of gold without total conviction for better or worse..............
mentoneman":1a2rv08r said:dude I was waffling for a bit...there was a D60 on the bay I almost jumped on and a carol ann selling on tfp i looked at HARD
but in the end the axe may give me 80-90 percent of the realism of ALL the amps and 100 percent of all the rack effects I desire
and the upgrades/refinents make it even sweeter
Bob Savage":2pbg6jp6 said:mentoneman":2pbg6jp6 said:dude I was waffling for a bit...there was a D60 on the bay I almost jumped on and a carol ann selling on tfp i looked at HARD
but in the end the axe may give me 80-90 percent of the realism of ALL the amps and 100 percent of all the rack effects I desire
and the upgrades/refinents make it even sweeter
Hey Pat!
Mmmmm... you know my opinion of the D60/D412.
I just came back to this thread so I haven't read your current findings and thoughts on the Axe, but I really think it's going to give you what you need. It should be killer for the church gig.
Rogue":xvn3dn22 said:I have a couple of requests if you have time and so desire.
One, should be easy enough, I'd really like to know what people feel about just the amp models. Most of clips are fairly wet. Strip away all the effects, and just play with the amp models. How do they sound/feel?
I'd like to hear the amp do thick, girthy tone. The thickest fattest daddy of them all, a JCM800 tone machine. Not a pussy, shrill, GNR type tone, but a fat, larger than life No More Tears type of tone.
The modelers do the modern thing pretty well, it seems, but modern amps they don't have that girthy, almost solid sounding depth that some of the classics amps do. I want to see if a modeler can simulate that, not just the surface tone.
Impress me, give us some No More Tears tone.
hijack away my man-samhill":3mrh6q9t said:Don't wish to hijack tweed's thread.
Here is my basic AxeFx tone...while playing No More Tears...no chorus. It's live so forgive the quality.
No More Tears is in the vid from about 4:00 to 6:00mins
Mark