
some dude
Active member
racerevlon":1j3i57hv said:There's a lot of guff about the Mark V. My experience: I went to buy a Road King, hated that and the Roadster, and bought the Mark V. After doing one or two rehearsals with the Mark V, I find myself actually playing Channel 2 most often, and it's got all the massive gain I need--just a function of dialing in the amp. Channel 3 is great for the "over-the-top" stuff and has plenty of gain and tone on tap.
I've done a little bit of experimenting and best I've been able to figure out channel 2's crunch mode is basically the Mark IV mode with a shallow 'V' shape EQ built into it with a slight mid shift and tamed sizzle to make it more focused as a rhythm channel. Channel 3 on the other-hand is a little more raw and harmonically rich, which makes it a bit harder to dial in for rhythm but makes it step out a bit more for lead.
The problem is when you A/B channel 2 and 3 the third channel always sounds thinner next to channel 2 with it's built in "V" contour. This effect drives me up a wall but I suspect Mesa did it on purpose so that if you use the same graphic EQ settings on channel 2 and 3 you get a slightly more scooped sounding rhythm tone out of channel 2 and a little more cutting a tone out of channel 3. The effect actually works pretty good when you combine it with a volume boost on 3. It makes your leads pop more but doesn't give you the 'thin tone' effect you normally get if you use a pure volume boost on your lead tone then switch back to a quieter rhythm tone.