How's it going in Tinfoil Corner?

  • Thread starter Thread starter V2a
  • Start date Start date
voodooradio1 said:
FFS! I thought it was an act, but you really are retarded.
Click to expand...

Quality shitposting in here, keep it up.

Picasso said:
He’s a total beta-male with V2 cuck boy not too far behind. I can’t stand cucks!
Click to expand...

Of all people here on Republican-Talk, you by far have the strongest obsession with cucks.

Krull said:
Remember this JClown77?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-attack-idUSKBN1EH03R
Click to expand...

Of course I remember it, numbnuts.
Are you aware of what reformative measures went in place straight after this event, superseding "ma rights!" of the citizen to ensure public safety?
 
War_in_D said:
What I find amusing with the whole "2A is outdated, and the founding father's had muskets in mind when they wrote it and could never conceive of the AR15" argument.. At least from the American standpoint, is that more often than not it's being made on a digital platform with your internet connected device. If that argument held water in any form or fashion, you'd be writing your 1st Amendment thoughts about the 2A on parchment paper using an ink well and a quill pen. So, if you're OK with the technical advancement of how you communicate your 1st Amendment Rights, don't bitch about the advancement of the 2A Rights. JMHO and 2 pennies.

I've exceeded my political post count again, and will be leaving now. Ya'll have at it.
Click to expand...
Metalhex said:
Excellent post!
Click to expand...

Is it?

1654728056702.jpeg
 
War_in_D said:
What I find amusing with the whole "2A is outdated, and the founding father's had muskets in mind when they wrote it and could never conceive of the AR15" argument.. At least from the American standpoint, is that more often than not it's being made on a digital platform with your internet connected device. If that argument held water in any form or fashion, you'd be writing your 1st Amendment thoughts about the 2A on parchment paper using an ink well and a quill pen. So, if you're OK with the technical advancement of how you communicate your 1st Amendment Rights, don't bitch about the advancement of the 2A Rights. JMHO and 2 pennies.

I've exceeded my political post count again, and will be leaving now. Ya'll have at it.
Click to expand...
Good stuff?
 
jdel77 said:
Quality shitposting in here, keep it up.



Of all people here on Republican-Talk, you by far have the strongest obsession with cucks.



Of course I remember it, numbnuts.
Are you aware of what reformative measures went in place straight after this event, superseding "ma rights!" of the citizen to ensure public safety?
Click to expand...
you mean Freedom-Talk....
 
jdel77 said:
Of course I remember it, numbnuts.
Are you aware of what reformative measures went in place straight after this event, superseding "ma rights!" of the citizen to ensure public safety?
Click to expand...
No I am not aware. Please do tell...


4dd9e7ccaed14185840ea224cc2ed59d_18.jpeg
 
Krull said:
No I am not aware. Please do tell...


4dd9e7ccaed14185840ea224cc2ed59d_18.jpeg
Click to expand...

Getting a lot of mileage out of that aren't you?
No context. No explanation.
Here's a pic of equal relevance to the current discussion.

1654731304620.png
 
voodooradio1 said:
Wow! An amp builder with a Facebook store front questioning the intelligence of others, while expressing his crazy lefty beliefs to potential customers. Im going to make sure you get lots of free advertising.
Click to expand...
I'm just busting some balls in this one thread, but I respect your God-given freedom to be a tattletale. I suspect that the Creamer Cowboy would consider tattling to be 'beta behaviour', however. Food for thought. Care to weigh in, @Picasso?
 
jdel77 said:
Is it?

View attachment 122674
Click to expand...

Alright, then present a valid argument against my point and prove your theory of "comparing apples to oranges". Technology advances. This was known in the Founding Father's day, just as it is in our day. Ever heard of a little invention called the Cotton Gin? Why wouldn't they believe that the logical advance of technology in weaponry would happen just like it did with the advent of the Cotton Gin or later with planes, trains and automobiles? After all, we went from the first powered flight in 1903, to landing on the moon in 1969. To assume that the Founding Fathers were so naive to think that weapons technology wouldn't advance is ludicrous. I believe that this is why the 2A was written to include "the right to keep an bear arms" not "the right to keep and bear muskets". In fact, I'd go one further when you pair it with the following from the US Constitution:

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government.
Click to expand...

My belief is that the intent of the Founding Fathers with regard to the 2A is that "We the People.." should have access to the same weaponry that a Government has in order to maintain that balance and ability to throw off such Government that might seek to opress them (I.E. long train of abuses, and userpations). So, to quote Dr. Hannibal Lecter.. thrill me with your acumen.
 
War_in_D said:
Alright, then present a valid argument against my point and prove your theory of "comparing apples to oranges". Technology advances. This was known in the Founding Father's day, just as it is in our day. Ever heard of a little invention called the Cotton Gin? Why wouldn't they believe that the logical advance of technology in weaponry would happen just like it did with the advent of the Cotton Gin or later with planes, trains and automobiles? After all, we went from the first powered flight in 1903, to landing on the moon in 1969. To assume that the Founding Fathers were so naive to think that weapons technology wouldn't advance is ludicrous. I believe that this is why the 2A was written to include "the right to keep an bear arms" not "the right to keep and bear muskets". In fact, I'd go one further when you pair it with the following from the US Constitution:



My belief is that the intent of the Founding Fathers with regard to the 2A is that "We the People.." should have access to the same weaponry that a Government has in order to maintain that balance and ability to throw off such Government that might seek to opress them (I.E. long train of abuses, and userpations). So, to quote Dr. Hannibal Lecter.. thrill me with your acumen.
Click to expand...

Right to Bear Arms​

Passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791. The first 10 amendments form the Bill of Rights


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


A feature of the second amendment, it does not say the right of the militia to keep and bear arms. It says the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

Warnings from a founding father.....

“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”
― Thomas Jefferson

“I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”
― Thomas Jefferson

Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.
___ Thomas Jefferson

A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have
~Thomas Jefferson

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered."
~ Thomas Jefferson(This quote is attributed to TJ but many scholars say it does not appear in his writings) The message is true either way.
 
War_in_D said:
Alright, then present a valid argument against my point and prove your theory of "comparing apples to oranges". Technology advances. This was known in the Founding Father's day, just as it is in our day. Ever heard of a little invention called the Cotton Gin? Why wouldn't they believe that the logical advance of technology in weaponry would happen just like it did with the advent of the Cotton Gin or later with planes, trains and automobiles? After all, we went from the first powered flight in 1903, to landing on the moon in 1969. To assume that the Founding Fathers were so naive to think that weapons technology wouldn't advance is ludicrous. I believe that this is why the 2A was written to include "the right to keep an bear arms" not "the right to keep and bear muskets". In fact, I'd go one further when you pair it with the following from the US Constitution:



My belief is that the intent of the Founding Fathers with regard to the 2A is that "We the People.." should have access to the same weaponry that a Government has in order to maintain that balance and ability to throw off such Government that might seek to opress them (I.E. long train of abuses, and userpations). So, to quote Dr. Hannibal Lecter.. thrill me with your acumen.
Click to expand...

So you’re honestly, and without any hint of sarcasm and irony, suggesting that the same maniacs who currently have free access to AR15’s should legally now have the right to get their hands on tanks and drones?

In the words of Wayne Campbell,

1654811971170.gif
 
harddriver said:

Right to Bear Arms​

Passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791. The first 10 amendments form the Bill of Rights


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


A feature of the second amendment, it does not say the right of the militia to keep and bear arms. It says the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

Warnings from a founding father.....

“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”
― Thomas Jefferson

“I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”
― Thomas Jefferson

Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.
___ Thomas Jefferson

A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have
~Thomas Jefferson

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered."
~ Thomas Jefferson(This quote is attributed to TJ but many scholars say it does not appear in his writings) The message is true either way.
Click to expand...
Awesome?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top