Is this proof of Multiverse or simply that the Universe is older than we thought or..... Both.... Or is it younger somehow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The~Kid
  • Start date Start date

Is the Universe older than believed or is there a Multiverse or both

  • Older

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Multiverse

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • Younger

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
It is better......


I never said it was any other of the BS you are yapping about. I explained it as said, it is supported by Cosmic Inflation and it pretty much explains both the start or "stretch" of the universe and the "squeeze" that eventually would come with space/time stretching faster than the speed of light again supported by Cosmic Inflation allowing for another universe or universes to spontaneously come from nothing as Hawkings proposed as well.

Ive explained it as best as I could in a simple, straightforward manner based on what the universe has shown us from General Relativity to Cosmic Inflation, Spontaneous Universe etc etc and what it says about the start and ultimately the end of the universe.


Again dont have equations to show as much but the basic logic is sound, speaks and stands for itself vs pretty much any of the other models mentioned on the topic.

Don't have any supporting evidence and can't even explain your little doodle other than to call it a Mexican sombrero, but have the gall to compare yourself to the likes of Hawking. You must fancy yourself as a real idiot savant; minus the savant part.
 
Don't have any supporting evidence and can't even explain your little doodle other than to call it a Mexican sombrero, but have the gall to compare yourself to the likes of Hawking. You must fancy yourself as a real idiot savant; minus the savant part.
There is supporting evidence..... As said its supported by General Relativity, Cosmic Inflation and Hawkings......



Again and it's better and intuitive model that doesn't require a bunch of fancy BS to explain itself other than common sense :dunno:
 
There is supporting evidence..... As said its supported by General Relativity, Cosmic Inflation and Hawkings......



Again and it's better and intuitive model that doesn't require a bunch of fancy BS to explain itself other than common sense :dunno:
Throwing out random terms like cosmic inflation and general relativity then exclaiming "there's your supporting evidence" doesn't cut it. I doubt you could even explain the slightest bit about about cosmic inflation or general relativity. If you knew even a shred of physics you'd understand very little of it works on common sense especially when you're talking theoretical physics

You sure are best friends with this GayAtollah Lover and America/Trump Hater 😂
Pretty sure most here know I'm no fan of his.
 
Throwing out random terms like cosmic inflation and general relativity then exclaiming "there's your supporting evidence" doesn't cut it. I doubt you could even explain the slightest bit about about cosmic inflation or general relativity. If you knew even a shred of physics you'd understand very little of it works on common sense especially when you're talking theoretical physics


Pretty sure most here know I'm no fan of his.
Yes yes okay...... Whats it too you then.... I'm wrong, I'm a dumbass, youre right.....

Who gives a fuck right.....

And yes you sure ❤️ NoHustles Cock :yes:
 
New trending GIF tagged batman done facepalm cant… | Trending Gifs
 
Is this really a thread where Kid claims to understand the forces that power the universe, posit support for, and an explanation of, a “multiverse” and imply that his intellect is on par with someone like Hawking and Einstein? 🤦

P.S. Is there any way we could entice Neil “DeAss” Tyson to drop in and debate the merits of his ramblings (aka “The Sombrero Doodles”) or submit for peer review?
 
Amazing what you CAN do even being in a chair and fucking useless. Degenerate little prick he was.
I never really bought into the idea he was some invalid super genius. I guess for the most part what and who the world holds in regard, I do not, but I'm sort of a contrarian by nature so perhaps I harbor some internal bias.
 
I never really bought into the idea he was some invalid super genius. I guess for the most part what and who the world holds in regard, I do not, but I'm sort of a contrarian by nature so perhaps I harbor some internal bias.
Theory is just that...theory and when the academic world embrace and pronouce a genius they're only feathering their own nests and validating their lazy assed existence.

I'm a 'show me don't tell me' guy because talk is the cheapest commodity AND PROBLEM in mankind's existence.
 
Is this really a thread where Kid claims to understand the forces that power the universe, posit support for, and an explanation of, a “multiverse” and imply that his intellect is on par with someone like Hawking and Einstein? 🤦

P.S. Is there any way we could entice Neil “DeAss” Tyson to drop in and debate the merits of his ramblings (aka “The Sombrero Doodles”) or submit for peer review?
And here we were thinking he was only a financial genius.
 
Back
Top