Jan 6th … Interesting info.

  • Thread starter Thread starter SQUAREHEAD
  • Start date Start date
Truth and facts don't matter if they go against the narrative.

:ROFLMAO:


“I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such: because I think a general government necessary for us, and there is no form of government but what may be a Blessing to the People if well-administered; and I believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years and can only end in Despotism as other Forms have done before it, when the People shall become so corrupted as to need Despotic Government, being incapable of any other.”
― Benjamin Franklin

....and here we are.
 
Prof. Lawnchair said:
Source, please.
Click to expand...
It's going to take some time , I have hundred's and hundred's of articles on this stuff . I'll gladly post it when I find it but I'm in no rush to prove anything to anybody people will believe whatever they want to believe but if they really say everything will be released you will be able to read it all yourself . I'll see if I can dig it up anyway because I'm still not sure what side you're on . If you were a confirmed Pinko I would say go blow .
 
indifference works for me. the decline is inevitable, the collapse is inevitable.

enjoy the ride, plan your exit strategy.

now I just need to get my boat, sell some gear...
 
ccn said:
It's going to take some time , I have hundred's and hundred's of articles on this stuff . I'll gladly post it when I find it but I'm in no rush to prove anything to anybody people will believe whatever they want to believe but if they really say everything will be released you will be able to read it all yourself . I'll see if I can dig it up anyway because I'm still not sure what side you're on . If you were a confirmed Pinko I would say go blow .
Click to expand...
ok man, but it’s not about proving it to me - it’s about backing it up - and 6 or 7 phone calls between Pelosi and Epps would be the kind of stuff that one would keep handy for immediate further review. If your source indicates otherwise it is because they are lying to you. Be careful out there, my friend.
 
Prof. Lawnchair said:
ok man, but it’s not about proving it to me - it’s about backing it up - and 6 or 7 phone calls between Pelosi and Epps would be the kind of stuff that one would keep handy for immediate further review. If your source indicates otherwise it is because they are lying to you. Be careful out there, my friend.
Click to expand...

If you could only see how much stuff I have stockpiled on this topic going back to that very day , it's mind boggling and takes a shit load of time to scan through all of it. This source isn't a personal friend or anything it's a part of all the stuff that has been hidden for good reason . You know all the stuff that the Sham J6 committee adamantly refused to allow to be heard because it would have destroyed them before anything even got going .

That's why I don't buy for a minute that everything will be heard and open for anybody to check out on the matter . Select stuff may be cherry picked but no way in hell will they ever release the stuff that would end the careers of very powerful people and subject them to prosecution .

Just like they still refuse to do anything about the stuff on Hunters laptop and still refuse to make public Epstein's client list . The FBI still refuses to do anything about the below for God's sake.

CwRCfiQWcAAtKdR.jpg
 
Prof. Lawnchair said:
Under the law the defendant would be entitled to show to the jury that despite what the prosecutor says the videos in A show,
the videos in B prove that you were not trespassing, rather, the workers invited you/gave you permission to be right where the prosecutor said was trespassing/employees only.
You see, in my example, the jury - (the American people?) not Adam Schiff or Chuck Schumer - sees both tapes at the trial (not 28 months of jail time later) and gets to decide.

Imagine that.

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)​

PRIMARY HOLDING
The government's withholding of evidence that is material to the determination of either guilt or punishment of a criminal defendant violates the defendant's constitutional right to due process.
Click to expand...
Exactly what I was just about to say, Brady violation. Thanks for posting. In another case, one of the Proud Boys had over 300 pieces of evidence erased. He'll likely have his case thrown out as well.
 
DemNuts said:
What a stupid analogy. Let's try something a bit more apropos.

A: Surveillance tapes show you in employee's faces refusing to obey their instructions to stop advancing into off-limits areas.
Some different tapes show you trespassing in an EMPLOYEES ONLY area, disrupting an upper level management meeting in the process.
All of the store's employees had to be evacuated because of yours and others' actions.

You are being charged for these crimes.

B: 26 months later you find a bunch of tapes showing you strolling around the public areas of the store and even
stopping to have pleasant conversations with some workers.

You're simply an idiot if you think that B all of a sudden expunges A.
Click to expand...


And You call ‘his analogy’ stupid??

Chuckles the Legal Correspondent Tinfoil Clown?

5A34D904-B9D2-4B9B-ACD5-1A67B4355571.jpeg
 
Dammit, you guys are still talking about January 6th !

That's was like 2 fucking months ago already.

All this, and we can't get a decent JFK assassination thread going here. :mad:
 
PLX said:
Dammit, you guys are still talking about January 6th !

That's was like 2 fucking months ago already.

All this, and we can't get a decent JFK assassination thread going here. :mad:
Click to expand...
I know someone who'd love to talk about JFK - too bad he's not a member here...or maybe he is... :sneaky:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top