THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA , ALL LIES, ALL THE TIME .

[Ben Waylin]

It's to trigger libtards into criticizing CNN not realizing that I'm CCN not CNN . It has worked better than I could have ever imagined .

You've got 'em on the run !

 

[NowYou'rePlayingWithPower]

"I ain't got no alts"

-Douche Bag

 

[ccn]

This is no surprise because google and the mainstream already list independent websites as disinformation but the mainstream is stepping up their game to force people to only accept news from the mainstream media

Truth Has Not Been Approved: New 'Web Shield' Warning On Independent Websites Says, 'This Site Contains Harmful Programs,' - Possibly A Beta Test Before 2024 Presidential Election​

In 2017, after Independent Media collectively helped bypass the "Clinton" (Democrat) media to help Donald Trump get elected as President, big tech along with social media platforms, declared war on conservative-leaning Independent Media websites.

Since then a number of things have happened, all meant to do two things; 1) Prevent Independent Media from countering the liberal MSM, and; 2) Do everything possible to bankrupt conservative websites and businesses.

Banks started deplatforming conservatives and their businesses, social media giants, including Twitter before Elon Much purchased it and named it X, blocked, shadow banned and terminated many conservative accounts, big tech blacklisted and demonetized right-leaning websites, and a group was created called NewsGuard, which subsequently became federally funded, warned advertisers away from any website that did not comply with the "official" narrative of the day.

Now we have some sort of beta test going on where certain browsers that have "web shield" installed are now offering warnings about conservative-leaning websites, listing them as "dangerous" in the address bar on top of the browser. In order to get to the website one has to hit the "show more" button, and then the "I understand the risk, take me to this site anyway," bypassing the bright white button saying "back to safety."

This began a couple of weeks ago with only one website, but today, it happened on both Breitbart and The Federalist.



Even after clicking 'show more" and finally managing to get to the website, the bright red "dangerous" label is left on the top left of the address bar.



The same for the Federalist:





The claim is that there is Malware on the websites, obviously in order to scare readers away from them, attempting to force readers to get their news from the liberal MSM.

For those wanting to check their own browser for this Web Shield, go to your settings, or the three grey dots, top right on your browser, the go to security and privacy, and if Web Shied is there are active, turn it off unless you want them to try to scare you away from Independent News.

ANP Emergency Fundraiser: The globalists war on ANP is all part of the globalists 'Big Tech' effort to silence conservative and independent voices, allowing them to maintain a monopoly on the flow of information. As George Orwell made clear to us decades ago, "The further a society drifts from the truth, the more they will hate those who speak it." But, with your amazing help, we at ANP promise to keep 'speaking truth to power' because, as Orwell also reminded us, "If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."












BOTTOM LINE
When readers see notes on Independent Media websites asking for donations as we do here at ANP, this is the reason.

In order to report the truth, without being forced to toe the "official narrative" line, we have to accept ads that make the least amount of money since Google's predatory practices make it nearly impossible to survive on ad revenue alone, and the federally funded NewsGuard are scaring advertisers into thinking advertising on conservative-leaning is unsafe for their brands.

This new labeling of websites such as Breitbart and The Federalist, along with others that probably don't even know that Web Shield is targeting them, seems to be a beta test ahead of the 2024 presidential elections, to prevent Independent Media from bypassing, and countering the liberal MSM as we all collectively did in 2016 to get Trump elected.


https://allnewspipeline.com/Truth_Has_Not_Been_Approved.php

 

[ccn]

Just another example of how bogus factcheckers are .

Facebook ‘Fact-Checker’ Suggests Israelis Were Unharmed during Hamas Terror Attack at Music Festival​

https://slaynews.com/news/facebook-...-unharmed-hamas-terror-attack-music-festival/

 

[ccn]

OUR DISGRACEFUL PRESS​

The British Broadcasting Company is a notoriously anti-Semitic news outlet. Currently, the BBC is under pressure to start calling Hamas a “terrorist” organization rather than a “militant” one. The BBC is stoutly defending its refusal to label Hamas as terrorist, claiming that it is neutral in the conflict between Israel and Hamas, and calling Hamas terrorists would mean taking a side. In fact, of course, the BBC has never been neutral, it has always been anti-Israel.

Now it turns out that the BBC has had to let go a number of its News Arabic reporters for their open support of Hamas:

BBC News Arabic reporters — including those reporting out of Egypt and Lebanon — appeared to back Palestinians or criticize the Jewish state in posts they either tweeted or liked, the Financial Times reported.

One of the reporters liked a message that appeared to describe Hamas terrorists as “freedom fighters,” the outlet reported.
***
The alleged social-media activity included the liking of a tweeted video of bodies and kidnapped people being loaded onto a vehicle with a caption reading “proud moment” and another saying Israelis “will live as a thief and a usurper,” The Wrap reported.

Reports have variously identified six or seven BBC employees who have been let go. Who are they?

They were Mahmoud Sheleib, a senior broadcast journalist, freelancer Aya Hossam, correspondent Sally Nabil, Cairo-based Salma Khattab, Beirut-based religious affairs correspondent Sanaa Khouri, Beirut-based editor Nada Abdelsamad and Amr Fekry, a sports correspondent and pundit at BBC Arabic, according to the report.

My question is, how have these people been influencing the BBC’s reporting on the Middle East not just this week, but for years? The BBC has been feeding its viewers and readers misinformation, partly on the basis of input from “journalists” who call murdering and kidnapping Jews a “proud moment.”

Speaking of misinformation, this is my favorite tweet today:

 

[ccn]

Soros funds and controls all the mainstream fact checkers including Politifact, Snopes, Factcheck.org etc... but leftists STILL always link to them .

Newsguard Censors, Funded by the Left, Run by the Left ​

Newsguard is a self appointed fact checker whose co-founder is tied to George Soros and his political influencing operation of so-called charities. Newsguard has a lot of power and is allied with the teacher’s union now. Teachers think their fact-checking is legitimate.

They are also backed by Big Pharma, Big Tech, and the government, and their staff is solely left-leaning activists. The government paid Newsguard over 700,000 dollars to censor.


Newsguard’s mission is to “counter misinformation on behalf of readers, brands, and democracies.” In other words, it guards the news by telling you what you can and cannot trust.

PragerU’s CEO Marissa Streit said that political and corporate elites empowered Newsguard to censor anyone who doesn’t comply with their agenda.

Newsguard wants to control the narrative on any and every topic, from climate change, COVID-19 treatments, and vaccines to elections, Planned Parenthood, and the World Economic Forum, just to name a few. Any outlet that does not conform to its agenda is targeted, blacklisted, and punished.


Perfect ratings are given to the New York Times and LA Times. CNN gets 80%, Democracy Now, a Soros-funded group, gets 75%; Mother Jones, another Soros group, gets 87.5%; and the Clinton-funded Media Matters gets 80%. Meanwhile, Prager U gets 57%, as does Fox News. Breitbart gets 49.5%, along with The Epoch Times. The Federalist gets 12.5%. If you know the publications, you know how biased these ratings are.

The Daily Wire and Sentinel are on the banned list.

You can’t get a good rating if you’re on the right. Tails they win, heads they win.

https://www.independentsentinel.com/newsguard-censors-funded-by-the-left-run-by-the-left/

 

[ccn]

AP Stylebook Suggests Hamas Not Be Called ‘Terrorists,’ Though Term Is Fine for Republicans​

The media complex in this country has taken itself to all-new lows the past week regarding the manner in which the Israel-Hamas war has been covered. The wildly errant reporting is bad enough, but there has also been hesitancy towards calling out horrific acts, striving to deliver a both-sides approach towards heinous attackers, a willingness to be more critical of our ally Israel, and taking at face value spoon-fed reports from the terror group Hamas.

And on this last point, there is yet another issue; the unwillingness of news outlets to even address the murderous outfit operating from Gaza as a group of “terrorists”.

https://redstate.com/bradslager/202...errorists-acceptable-for-republicans-n2165534

 

[skoora]

I knew there had to be a right wing, mirror image of JD on here somewhere…

 

[311boogieman]

So glad you bumped this. I miss @ccn. He abruptly quit a year or so ago for no apparent reason.

Maybe he'll come back some day.

I knew there had to be a right wing mirror image of JD on here somewhere…

He was pretty extreme and prolific no doubt, but at least he usually tried to provide facts, links and sources.

 

[Monkey Man]

Actually brother, he was bant by Terry as one of his last acts before he died.

Just over a year ago I unbant him. Here's the link...

Aug 10, 2024 Add bookmark

... and transcript. As I said, he's welcome back any time in my book:

From what I can tell he received 3 warnings in October last year:

1) Knock off personal attacks. Attack the subject being discussed. Do not attack those in discussion. 1 of 3 warnings. Banning on 3rd event...

2) Inappropriate behaviour

3) No personal attacks

Then the mod involved bant him in November. Reason: "Ban permanent. Too disruptive of an instigator. Forum much more peaceful without."

Personally I liked and appreciated him; he was a great contributor here IMHO and I reckon he just became a bit triggered / short-tempered for a week or so. Tempted to unban him right now. He didn't deserve what he got IMHO.

Fuck it, I'm unbanning him. Dude is welcome back any time in my book.

 

[Monkey Man]

Also, as I said a few posts later in the thread, "I PM'd him in September last year, just 2 months before his ban, to thank him for his tireless contributions."

 

[311boogieman]

Fair enough and thanks for the clarification brother. I do remember that now. But if he was unbanned and didn't come back then he 'also' quit

 

[Monkey Man]

I also remember asking the OTC membership to let him know that I'd unbant him if anyone was still in-contact with him.

That was around the same time. It's sad from my POV 'cause as I said to him in a PM, I really appreciated his tireless efforts. The sheer number of links / references he used to include in his posts alone was impressive IMHO.

 

[The Blazing Saddle]

 

[Robostyle]