rsm
Well-known member
Not really sure what you mean. Regardless, the tonemaster sucks compared to it's tube counterpart. Digital stuff is all based on profit for the manufacturer, and convenience and cost savings for that of the consumer.
Not really sure what you mean. Regardless, the tonemaster sucks compared to it's tube counterpart. Digital stuff is all based on profit for the manufacturer, and convenience and cost savings for that of the consumer.
If this is blues then Mountain is death metal.![]()
The Fryette probably saved it in this case. It is probably naturally more scooped with more fullness. The thin thing happens more with flat SS power amps.
so you like those mellow blues
View attachment 449528
Yeah, I’ve got those, too.
I can certainly say that either of those amps in the picture don’t add or take away anything from the modeler itself, but they do have a big difference in how they make speakers move, which is entirely independent of the modeler.
“It’s probably this or probably that”…..or, it probably just works.
The more time goes on and the more pearl clutching/handwringing I see around modeling the more certain I am that there’s some kind of perceived merit in being dissatisfied with them. There’s certainly a HUGE gap in between what I read about them online and what I actually experience using them, which doesn’t happen with amps, pedals or guitars, oddly enough.
I'm gonna add that both Paul Gilbert and the Bonermaster have absolutely terrible tone, too, so this isn't exactly the digital flex the article seems to think it is
They are both monster players, especially PG, but his tone has always been horrifying
Bonermaster has better tone, but is a much worse player than PG, so it kind of evens out
The Fryette probably saved it in this case. It is probably naturally more scooped with more fullness. The thin thing happens more with flat SS power amps.
Joe Bonamassa takes digital amp on tour
I’m calling it now. Our official rig talk, tone chaser phrase is Chug Bloom.Not really. I am pretty much all high gain, and things like pick attack, and proper chug bloom are really hard to get right in the digital stuff.
I have been saying it for years!I’m calling it now. Our official rig talk, tone chaser phrase is Chug Bloom.
Yeah, it’s time for weird mids to pass the torch and retire in comfort at Scott Splawn’s gardening shed.I have been saying it for years!
I don't think anyone fills the SRV void. I enjoy busier players but there is a point where it kind of becomes meh cause it's blowing notes more than saying something. This is technically impressive, Lance is quite a monster player and used to tour with Lucky Peterson, but it seems kinda off in a way cause he's packing so many notes into some parts that don't really call for it IMO.....
I agree, but I hate tribute acts also.It’s funny, I dig music that’s more old school and like the classic gear etc. but there’s something about guys who try and look like they’re in the 70’s who weren’t alive then, that really bugs me. I fucking hate retro bands that go full on with the look. Dig the music (not this guy's playing per se) but there’s something really lame about living your whole life as an affectation. (Not including tribute bands).
What I need is a Cactus type band but they all look like Japanese cyberpunks![]()
Yeah, just saying at least tribute acts have a reason for the look. Not necessarily a reason to existI agree, but I hate tribute acts also.