L
LAVALLE
Active member
You are obviously a very cool and understanding guy and I'm not suggesting that you should have any ill will toward the builder/shipper, but besides SUBSTANTIALLY IMHO devaluing the guitar, I think no matter how good the repair, it will never be what you waited so long for and paid so much for. It's like if you custom ordered a new car and after waiting months and months to get it, it falls off the transporter in front of the dealership and gets smashed. Would you want them to fix it or would you want a new car? That guy owes you a new guitar. It's that simple in my opinion. I'm really sorry that happened to you. Good luck with whatever you decide to do.
steve_k":3pr96rjt said:Hold on.....
While I appreciate the "condolences", it is not my intent to throw the builder under the bus. Gil is without a doubt, the undisputed master luthier of '59 Replica's. The guitar itself is beautiful and the neck is to die for. I am sure it sounds and plays as good as it looks. I have talked to both parties and we will no doubt work something out amicably. As it stands now, it was my decision to send it off to someone I trust to make a repair worthy of this guitar. When it comes back, if I am not satisfied, it will be replaced. If it is something I want to keep, then there will be some restitution paid, as it clearly devalued my investment and there's the repair and shipping costs to recover which no doubt will be honored. Yes, I am extremely disappointed and gutted with the delivery of the guitar. The "lacking in packing" was a bad judgement call and all I can say he has been extremely lucky in the past with shipping. But, there's no hard feelings. Shit happens. We'll get it sorted out - just its gonna be another couple months before I can play the bitch. I know who all has new builds in play, and have advised them about considering sending their own case. Gil may be limited on what he can get due to location. Anyway, its all good.
Steve