P
paulyc
Well-known member
I'd like them in the G2 as well
paulyc":1yq7t0q0 said:I'd like them in the G2 as well
paulyc":2l859sq6 said:I'm trying like hell to AVOID editing anything on a Lexicon piece of gear because it's IMPOSSIBLE to use that interface...horrible.
paulyc":chs2pnlv said:I think for a luminary like you it is simple to edit, I doubt most users would agree with you though
bstaley":50d9utke said:Had a MPXG2 and a MPX-1. Sounded great but absolute nightmares to program. The idiot who designed the GUI for them should be shot. I got rid of both of them.
JMMP":3shfxvqn said:That's a nice guide you made Piero. I agree with you and Italo. I learned to program the 1 and G2 by turning it on and pressing buttons til I figured it out. For the little tricks and tips and such, I refer to the manual, but I was able to make a shimmer patch with reverb and pitch in the FB loop of the delay in about 5 minutes.
What I wish they (Lexicon) would have spent more time on is the annoying level issue in the Post amp/effects loop portion. No matter how I mess with the levels, it always lowers the dry level by 3dB (at least). My solution now is to run it stereo summed to mono in a Suhr MiniMix II, or sometimes as a W/D/W with the G2 "loop in" being fed by the slave output on my amp head and using the built in cab simulator to output the effects through the balanced L and R outputs on the back.
JMMP":16kjrz2a said:I have 1.1 in my G2, so I'm fairly certain that is the latest revision. My MPX-1 is the 1.0, and I'd argue it handles the levels better than the G2.