Monomyth
Well-known member
Yes...
Exo-metal
Well-known member
Maybe my cab is older than I think, that's how good the secret weapon is?
japetus
Well-known member
It's because the guy played punk through it...it made it good.
Exo-metal
Well-known member
Makes sense, you guys are the smartest dogs on the net.
Markedman
Well-known member
"Why Jeremy complains about the eq make zero sensei if you set it up to assault mode like I do. The GEQ is far superior to the non eq models and this clip shows how violent this amp can be but again no way is it possible to even approach this level of heavy without it, period."
No extreme without an EQ of some sort in the loop. Built-in GEQ is at least twice as good as putting a GEQ in the loop on a Boogie Mark amp. The only people who disagree are pepole who own a non-GEQ Boogie amps, denial. But I"ve own both kinds of Boogie amps and I have compared the amps in person and it isn't hard to tell in the room which was superior, not that the other was unusable it's just that one sounded and felt better than the other.
I used to own a C+ SRG and it's the only amp or guitar I've regretted selling. I sold it to a friend so if it ever comes up for sale I will buy it back. I think the SRG is the one for my rash style as it rips a little more than the HRG just like 50 watt early Marshall amps, and especially the DRG which is liquidish in comparison.
No extreme without an EQ of some sort in the loop. Built-in GEQ is at least twice as good as putting a GEQ in the loop on a Boogie Mark amp. The only people who disagree are pepole who own a non-GEQ Boogie amps, denial. But I"ve own both kinds of Boogie amps and I have compared the amps in person and it isn't hard to tell in the room which was superior, not that the other was unusable it's just that one sounded and felt better than the other.
I used to own a C+ SRG and it's the only amp or guitar I've regretted selling. I sold it to a friend so if it ever comes up for sale I will buy it back. I think the SRG is the one for my rash style as it rips a little more than the HRG just like 50 watt early Marshall amps, and especially the DRG which is liquidish in comparison.
Last edited:
Exo-metal
Well-known member
That's right?
There's no weakness in the GEQ models. It's all in the setup and as my friend MC says, "it's the sum of the parts." I have a guitar with a emg and I don't even like those but it can get even more nasty with an 81. This clip is just a jb. I have always preferred old jb pups. That 81 with a boosted front end is another step up in gain but this was only a clip of how the amp responds straight in to contrast the non eq argument.
There's no weakness in the GEQ models. It's all in the setup and as my friend MC says, "it's the sum of the parts." I have a guitar with a emg and I don't even like those but it can get even more nasty with an 81. This clip is just a jb. I have always preferred old jb pups. That 81 with a boosted front end is another step up in gain but this was only a clip of how the amp responds straight in to contrast the non eq argument.
Last edited:
Monomyth
Well-known member
I have a Marshall full stack from 1978, scored for a whopping 550$ on clist two years ago, those old cabs fucking smoke everything new, they have their own "depth" circuit
R
Racerxrated
Well-known member
Vintage stuff rules; I don't care what amp/speaker/cab/guitar you wanna throw out there. I don't have the coin for a true vintage axe; my 84 Charvel I suppose is 'almost' vintage....but there's just no comparison to vintage amps/cabs etc. They all have something new stuff just can't approach.I have a Marshall full stack from 1978, scored for a whopping 550$ on clist two years ago, those old cabs fucking smoke everything new, they have their own "depth" circuit
Monomyth
Well-known member
Those old pieces of gear had energy, people coined the term “mojo” for it, the term has lost its meaning these days but those who know, know.
Similar threads
- Candrew
- Rig-Talk
