I love modded Marshalls and have owned many, including a KK++ and a Rockmonster. I love Dan's amps; I think they're killer. One thing, though, that all modded Marshalls "suffer" from, IMO, is being a lot of fun to play on their own but not being super usable in a band context.
For example, Camerons sound really good in a room by themselves. They're super easy to play, very compressed, and super high gain. But if you're in a band context, especially recording, that sound is probably not going to be very useful. Your producer is almost certainly going to tell you to pull back on the gain, up the mids, roll back the presence, etc. because that's what works in that context. Now you might use that sound for solos or overdubs or certain other parts, but you get what I mean. These amps don't typically sit in the mix all that well without a lot of tweaks. In other words, the super fun in-the-room gain fest that got you to buy the amp probably isn't going to be useful on a recording, or even live.
This is why the stock amps seem to work better in a lot of contexts. They have less gain, less compression, and sit in the mix better. When you crank them up, they hit the sweet spot that works better in bands.
As another example, I think this is why a lot of people think the JEL is Dave Friedman's best circuit. It's very different from Dave's other amps because it's basically just a stock 2203 with Dave's tweaks. It's got a lot less gain, less compression, and is much brighter and, dare I say, thinner than a BE. But in a recording or a band, it fucking rules. It sounds perfect in that context.
I still love all my modded Marshalls and I use them all the time but I think there is a legit argument that the stock versions of amps often deliver "that sound" you're looking for in a band context much better than flamethrower amps like Camerons, Gowers, etc. Ofc, YMMV.