Mass Gov Signs Law - Abortion Until Moment of Birth

[Picasso]

So you think it’s alright to subjugate women and treat them as property. Got it.

Ask the faggot to tell you what a woman is.

 

[Picasso]

What a little cunt.

 

[Geo]

What a little cunt.

You mean big, stinky, hairy cunt.

 

[Picasso]

You mean big, stinky, hairy cunt.

That goes for Captain Faggot Kirk aka “Bagel and Creamcheese (super gay) too.

 

[NoHassle]

That goes for Captain Faggot Kirk aka “Bagel and Creamcheese (super gay) too.

You're bowel punched drunk. You do know these 2 guys have no foreskins so YOU should love them instead of hating on them.

 

[Picasso]

Wolfgang loves to protect his boyfriends.

 

[Shevek]

 

[NoHassle]

Wolfgang loves to protect his boyfriends.

You protect yours by being inside them.

 

[Robostyle]

You do know these 2 guys have no foreskins so YOU should love them instead of hating on them.

Having a foreskin or not, is not really anybody's own choice, since it is done soon after birth.
So shitting on someone for a choice that was not theirs is kind of a weird flex.

 

[Robostyle]

View attachment 456140

Is this how it is in new zealand?
Because this doesn't happen here.
You seem to think you have a firm grasp on what life is like in the US, but your posts prove otherwise.

 

[Picasso]

Is this how it is in new zealand?
Because this doesn't happen here.
You seem to think you have a firm grasp on what life is like in the US, but your posts prove otherwise.

He just wants free cock, that’s all.

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

And a follow up to the above...

When someone becomes upset by another person holding conflicting ideas, it is rarely just a disagreement over facts. Instead, it usually triggers deep psychological, social, and neurological defense mechanisms.

1. The Threat to Shared Reality and Trust​

Humans are ultra-social creatures who rely on a shared understanding of the world to cooperate, predict behavior, and build trust. When someone holds a fundamentally contradictory view, it can subconsciously signal:

• "We do not live in the same reality."
• "I cannot reliably predict how this person will act."
  This creates a baseline sense of unpredictability, which the human brain interprets as a low-level social threat.

2. Cognitive Dissonance is Contagious and Uncomfortable​

As noted previously, holding conflicting ideas causes mental friction (cognitive dissonance). When you encounter someone who casually embraces paradox or contradicts what you consider absolute truth, it forces your own brain to do uncomfortable work.

• To protect itself from that mental strain, the brain often shortcuts the discomfort by labeling the other person as stubborn, irrational, or dangerous, rather than doing the heavy lifting of examining the paradox.

3. Moralization of Beliefs​

In modern psychology, beliefs—especially political, cultural, and social ones—tend to become "moralized." When an idea is tied to a person's core moral identity (what they consider good versus evil

• A differing or conflicting idea is no longer seen as just an alternative viewpoint.
• It is perceived as a direct attack on their character and morality.
  If you disagree with a moralized belief, you aren't just wrong; to them, you are threatening the social or moral order.

4. Identity Threat and Group Belonging​

Humans derive a massive amount of self-esteem and safety from group identity (tribalism). Accepting or tolerating conflicting ideas can feel like a betrayal of the group.

• People often react with anger to ambiguity because ambiguity threatens ideological purity.
• In many groups, demanding absolute alignment on ideas is a way of policing loyalty. If someone tolerates or holds conflicting ideas, it disrupts the "us versus them" boundary that keeps the group cohesive.

5. Intolerance of Ambiguity (Need for Closure)​

Psychologists measure a trait called the Need for Cognitive Closure. People who score high on this trait have a strong aversion to ambiguity, nuance, and unresolved questions. They want clear answers, categorization, and finality.

• For a high-closure mindset, holding conflicting ideas looks like chaos, indecision, or dishonesty.
• Their frustration stems from a genuine psychological distress at seeing a problem left open-ended or unresolved.

Those are all very nice but neither post is about hypocrisy.

I hope you didn't think they were.

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

So you think it’s alright to subjugate women and treat them as property. Got it.

Show me where I said that. Lol.

I CAN show you where you think that you have the right to impose YOUR values others in another country with their own religion, laws, morals, and values.

"You can't do that, it's against my religion".

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

That goes for Captain Faggot Kirk aka “Bagel and Creamcheese (super gay) too.

 

[70 Mach 1]

jheez thank you JTK.
i just upchucked my snack

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

jheez thank you JTK.
i just upchucked my snack

Picasso the dog will eat it. That's what dogs do.

After he finishes rubbing one out to that foot pic. Oh, not my feet by the way. Just some random google search. But that'll soon be in Lady Picasso's spank bank.

 

[Floyd Eye]

Show me where I said that. Lol.

I CAN show you where you think that you have the right to impose YOUR values others in another country with their own religion, laws, morals, and values.

"You can't do that, it's against my religion".

I don’t have a religion.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Those are all very nice but neither post is about hypocrisy.

I hope you didn't think they were.

No my posts were not specifically about hypocrisy, but related. It just so happened that is what AI spit out and it was close enough to the point I wanted to make. I even said so. Maybe I should have done a tl;dr for those who couldn't read between the lines.

The first of my posts demonstrated how an intelligent person could understand the nuance and context of each situation you presented, were one not so much could only see the surface level argument of telling people what to do.

The second post was just a dig at why people of lesser intelligence get upset over ideas & ideals that conflict with their own.

 

[Uzi Nein Millimetah]

Is anyone here old enough to remember when Shit Stain Dim VA Gov Ralphie Northam said it would be swell to allow mom and Herr Doktor to "have a conversation" about potentially executing a living baby OUTSIDE OF THE WOMB AFTER DELIVERY?

But at least Ralphie said the living infant would be "kept comfortable". How thoughtful. After opening this floodgate for infants that mommy and the doktors decide are unfit, I'm sure it would NEVER be abused for any reason after "normalization", such as the little tyke being offed so he/she can't interrupt mommy's (very important!) social life/career.

Yeah....THIS Ralph Northam (D) aka "Coonman".

Northam, Danson, Trudy Castro, what is it with sissy Dim "men" and painting their faces???

 

[Picasso]

Captain Faggot Kirk has a male feet fettish. What a fucking disgusting flaming homosexual he is.

P.S. He's probably masturbating right now over that super gay picture he posted.