Bad Brain
Well-known member
I don’t know that I would consider that propaganda. Would you? I think propaganda should require some outright lying or extreme distortion of facts.Good propaganda always has some truth in it so people can argue.
I don’t know that I would consider that propaganda. Would you? I think propaganda should require some outright lying or extreme distortion of facts.Good propaganda always has some truth in it so people can argue.
Like the title of this thread?Good propaganda always has some truth in it so people can argue.
Those who don't now their history are doomed to repeat it.Like the title of this thread?
Absolutely false.I think propaganda should require some outright lying or extreme distortion of facts.
Okay, then what do you think constitutes propaganda?Absolutely false.
Yea, being intentionally misleading is kind of what makes it propagandaI don’t know that I would consider that propaganda. Would you? I think propaganda should require some outright lying or extreme distortion of facts.
I wouldn’t disagree the article could be understood as misleading depending on one’s subjective view of the matter. I don’t know about intentionality — it’s impossible to know what the writers and editors believe and are trying to accomplish. It’s good to give people the benefit of the doubt.Yea, being intentionally misleading is kind of what makes it propaganda
So, maybe the largest news outlet in the world, that perpetuated the largest scam in history all of a sudden has no interest in propagandizing?Okay, then what do you think constitutes propaganda?
I asked you a direct question. This is the second time you’re talking around the issue.So, maybe the largest news outlet in the world, that perpetuated the largest scam in history all of a sudden has no interest in propagandizing?
Why all the talk about monkey pox and viruses now?
Not only that but intentionally fear mongering maybe true information when told to at a certain date.Yea, being intentionally misleading is kind of what makes it propaganda
Sure, but intentionality is difficult to ascertain.Not only that but intentionally fear mongering maybe true information when told to at a certain date.
Was the first time not enough to distrust them?Sure, but intentionality is difficult to ascertain.
I didn’t say I trusted them. I assume, perhaps wrongly, that the article is factually accurate.Was the first time not enough to distrust them?
If you don't trust them, why would you read the article in the first place?I didn’t say I trusted them. I assume, perhaps wrongly, that the article is factually accurate.
Because you two dickheads were discussing it.If you don't trust them, why would you read the article in the first place?
When it's backed by the Briben admin, there is nothing anyone can do about it.Frankly I’d be more upset about the 1 billion dollar secret migrant crisis fund they’re trying to hide from the public.
I don’t think they’re supposed to be hiding it from the public.When it's backed by the Briben admin, there is nothing anyone can do about it.
I don't think they really care.I don’t think they’re supposed to be hiding it from the public.
Well they’re all queer up there I heard.I don't think they really care.