TheGreatGreen
Well-known member
I dunno, if it was me and I wanted a solid body guitar and got a chambered one, I’d regret that it wasn’t a solid body every time I looked at it.Someday you will regret returning it.
I dunno, if it was me and I wanted a solid body guitar and got a chambered one, I’d regret that it wasn’t a solid body every time I looked at it.Someday you will regret returning it.
As we get older our tastes change and that guitar will double in value in about 5 years.I dunno, if it was me and I wanted a solid body guitar and got a chambered one, I’d regret that it wasn’t a solid body every time I looked at it.
This!In my experience lighter weight guitars to tend to have more lively, acoustic qualities on clean to edge of breakup settings - and lack a bit of firmness and punch as gain increases. My 2 absolute best sounding guitars for higher gain settings are a pair of slap together partscasters with Northern Hard Ash bodies. Each one weighs a ton. The lightest guitar in my stable is a Roasted Swamp Ash partscaster. Really nice guitar - very light - very resonant. I can sit in the living room and play it with no amp and it is 'almost' like having one of those thin bodied Ovation acoustics. But it just doesn't deliver at higher gain settings like the two Northern Ash guitars.
Yeah this isn't even a bash on chambered LPs. If I was looking for something that filled the role my ES Supreme does, this would be a good option. It's got NICE cleans and jazz/blues sounds.Man, that sucks
I prefer chambered LPs, but it sucks when you want one thing and got another.
No space for that - it's gotta be the 1-in/1-out plan for better or worse.As we get older our tastes change and that guitar will double in value in about 5 years.
He should keep it and buy another.
Some are. It comes down to the year, and specific finish. Some were dealer exclusives, M2M, quilt tops, etc. I think this seller just made an assumption, and didn't have the facts, or research the particular model. They're not all created equal, just because it's a 68 reissue LPC. There were variations, especially the year.I have two 68 ri's, both 2007. Both are chambered. I thought all 68 ri's were chambered.
If it's not what he wants he would never be happy with it, speaking from all my past experiences buying guitars.As we get older our tastes change and that guitar will double in value in about 5 years.
He should keep it and buy another.
Certainly appears so. Did Gibson do a chambered body in 68? How does one justify calling something a reissue if it differs from the original? Suppose it doesn't really matter but it leads to confusion. Leads back to the idea of play it before you buy it, make sure you like it, whatever it is...Some are. It comes down to the year, and specific finish. Some were dealer exclusives, M2M, quilt tops, etc. I think this seller just made an assumption, and didn't have the facts, or research the particular model. They're not all created equal, just because it's a 68 reissue LPC. There were variations, especially the year.
I think the seller was misinformed. Ignorance is no excuse, however. If OP wanted non-chambered, and paid for it with those expectations, he's certainly within his rights to return it.False advertising, either though willful deception or uninformed ignorance, is false advertising. You deserve a 100% refund + anything you’re out of pocket for, from this transaction.
He asked the seller directly if it was chambered and they said no. That’s pretty good research.Some are. It comes down to the year, and specific finish. Some were dealer exclusives, M2M, quilt tops, etc. I think this seller just made an assumption, and didn't have the facts, or research the particular model. They're not all created equal, just because it's a 68 reissue LPC. There were variations, especially the year.
I was referring to the seller. They failed to understand what they were selling. Either a liar, or misinformed. If they bought it new, he would have known better. If he bought it used under the assumption it was chambered, he passed on that assumption.He asked the seller directly if it was chambered and they dais no. That’s pretty good research.
I’ve owned a couple of chambered guitars and never want another one. In all cases, they sounded “soft” and wimpy with no bite. Not for me.
Oh gotcha! That makes sense.I was referring to the seller. They failed to understand what they were selling. Either a liar, or misinformed. If they bought it new, he would have known better. If he bought it used under the assumption it was chambered, he passed on that assumption.
Am I wrong in feeling like I would never want to buy a chambered/weight relief LP? I want the full pull, the real thick body and full top. I guess the "c" could mean many things.....Oh gotcha! That makes sense.
I was in Tulsa 2 weeks ago and thought I found the ultimate super light ‘54 RI Les Paul.
I noticed the C in the serial number and looked it up. Yep, chambered. Glad I didn’t buy that only to find out later!