Nooooo blue dots in Texas tonight. Celebration time.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 70 Mach 1
  • Start date Start date
Who cares if he's a vegan or she's a vegan? Paxton is a corrupt felon.
He's no more a felon than anyone else in big league politics. He paid his restitution and did his community service. Democrats believe that felons should be part of the political process once they've done their time so get back in line. :LOL:
 
He's no more a felon than anyone else in big league politics. He paid his restitution and did his community service. Democrats believe that felons should be part of the political process once they've done their time so get back in line. :LOL:
You don't think Paxton is especially corrupt?

In 2015, Paxton was indicted on state securities fraud charges.

In May 2023, Paxton was impeached by the Texas House of Representatives by a vote of 121–23, leading to his suspension.[4] The articles of impeachment included allegations that Paxton gave preferential treatment to a political donor who bribed him, misapplied public resources and made false statements against whistleblowers, obstructed justice in the securities fraud trial against him, and made false statements regarding his financial interests.

Paxton's securities fraud case, delaying the trial and discovery of evidence, preventing voters from gaining knowledge regarding Paxton.
Paxton made false statements to the State Securities Board regarding his illegal failure to register with them.
Paxton did not accurately reveal his financial interests to the Texas Ethics Commission, violating law.
Paxton made or directed for multiple false or misleading statements to be published in his office's report responding to the whistleblower allegations.
Paxton conspired or tried to conspire with other people for the actions detailed in the articles of impeachment.
Paxton abused his official power by having his office act to benefit him or other people.
Paxton ignored his duty and violated the Texas Constitution, his oaths of office, statutes and public policy for the actions detailed in the articles of impeachment.
Paxton was unfit for holding office for the actions detailed in the articles of impeachment.
Paxton abused or neglected his official power to prevent lawful governance and obstruct justice, bringing his office into "scandal and disrepute" for the actions detailed in the articles of impeachment.

In 2016, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a civil enforcement action against Paxton in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The SEC's complaint specifically charged Paxton with violating various provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and various provisions (including Rule 10b-5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by defrauding the Servergy investors.[295] Paxton denied the allegations.[271][296][297][298] One of the defendants and Servergy itself reached a separate settlement with the SEC, agreeing to pay $260,000 in penalties
 
FB_IMG_1780203431635.jpg
 
So let me get this straight...

The party who wants to relabel pedophiles as "minor attracted persons" and make them a protected class is up in arms because a Republican candidate struck a light plea deal with a convicted child rapist.

Am I the only one seeing the hypocrisy here?

I'm guessing if the candidate had a D next to their name all the libtards would be praising him for being so progressive.
 
So let me get this straight...

The party who wants to relabel pedophiles as "minor attracted persons" and make them a protected class is up in arms because a Republican candidate struck a light plea deal with a convicted child rapist.

Am I the only one seeing the hypocrisy here?

I'm guessing if the candidate had a D next to their name all the libtards would be praising him for being so progressive.
Lefties act like pedophilia cares about party lines all while trying to garner sympathy for the pedos on their side is some diabolical shit.
 
Back
Top