Oil finished guitars

  • Thread starter Thread starter the rossness
  • Start date Start date
the rossness

the rossness

Well-known member
The guitar nerd in me loves the wild 80’s paintjobs on guitars. I’ve always been attracted to those. Yet, I hear a difference in my guitars that just have a natural oil finish over the wood. They just seeme more alive. Pickups seem to matter less than they do in a guitar that’s painted. Does paint or a finish really affect tone that much?
 
Yes, thin nitro is way better than modern poly or urethane. Oil is even better !
 
I am considering picking up a 95 Washburn USA MG90. It's Grover Jackson's team making a superstrat for Washburn that is all mahogany with an oil finish rather than paint/stain/dye/whatever.
 
I cannot say there is definitely an audible difference, but it is definitely in my pschycy that it feels and plays better, which makes me play better and sound better.
 
Arm-R-Seal by General Finishes is excellent. It's a rubbing varnish oil blend. It was so easy to use. It dried in minutes, though you should leave to cure for a couple weeks.

On this LP copy I applied it with sandpaper and slurried in the grain instead of using regular filler.
 
Some say yes, some say no. I personally like how nitro wears...and smells :lol: :LOL: and feels on a neck.
 
LP Freak":3baodtfx said:
Some say yes, some say no. I personally like how nitro wears...and smells :lol: :LOL: and feels on a neck.
That's because you are a LP Freak. ;)
 
I heard a big change when I removed the paint from my Malmsteen strat. The guitar really "opened" up when it was bare wood. But ultimately I preferred the look of a painted guitar so re painted it (then changed the pickups to more suit what I like)

actually I should add when I stripped the paint I lost so much "height" with the bridge that the trem springs hung outside the back cavity :lol: :LOL: ... fender sure did put a lot of paint on there
 
Back
Top