OK, what's next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave M
  • Start date Start date
Aynirar27 said:
That’s why the scientific method exists.


Long held “institutionalized” ideas of the expansion of the universe have been absolutely turned on their head lately.

Science creates technology, technology scrutinizes science.
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
CrazyNutz said:
False. Scientific studies, and papers are peer reviewed.

One guy can investigate, but many peers in the field must scrutinize his findings, and agree or disagree.
Click to expand...
That's total bullshit. It's just not true. What it does is add confidence to the validity of the experiment and findings. "Peers" can be wrong and none are needed as mentioned.
 
CrazyNutz said:
chill Krull likes that kind of talk :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
It doesn't make you sound intelligent. It makes you sound like street trash. I have a modicum of respect for you for motivating me to hit the bricks in my running boots so please do better next time.
 
denialist said:
That's total bullshit. It's just not true. What it does is add confidence to the validity of the experiment and findings. The "Peers" can be wrong and none are needed as mentioned.
Click to expand...

And if they are ALL wrong, eventually new data will come in, and some new scientist will use such data to prove otherwise.
 
VonBonfire said:
It doesn't make you sound intelligent. It makes you sound like street trash. I have a modicum of respect for you for motivating me to hit the bricks in my running boots so please do better next time.
Click to expand...

Bro, it's just ball busting talk. Krull and I have a long history, if he's offended I'll apologize.

@Krull I'm sorry for saying your mom blows Julius Caesar :ROFLMAO:
 
denialist said:
That's not entirely true space boy. Yes, scientists aren't above bias or politics, and studies and statistics can be manipulated or fabricated. I don't believe in a flat earth. I'm agnostic.
Click to expand...

Ok I have some time to form actual sentences now.
The manipulations you mention are not the science, it’s the people.

Take global warming, or climate change, or whatever you want to call it

Science will tell you CO2 traps heat
Science will tell you how much CO2 is in the atmosphere
Science will tell you the temperature of the earth.
Science will tell you how much CO2 a car or factory produces

After that, it’s people putting that information in to a narrative. A popular one is noticing a general rise in the first 3 things around the same time as the rise of the 4th thing, hence man made global warming.

I person who happens to be a scientist may agree with that narrative, but that is not the same as saying “science is pushing global warming”

Science is impartial.
 
Aynirar27 said:
I person who happens to be a scientist may agree with that narrative, but that is not the same as saying “science is pushing global warming”
Click to expand...
The consensus from the "scientific community" is that global warming is real. So obviously mainstream science is pushing global warming. It doesn't make it real just because a bunch of duds say so.
 
VonBonfire said:
The consensus from the "scientific community" is that global warming is real. So obviously mainstream science is pushing global warming. It doesn't make it real just because a bunch of duds say so.
Click to expand...

The temperature of the earth is getting warmer, that is what the science tells you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top