
maggotspawn
New member
I haven't had problems biasing mine at all.
Muddy low end is classic Peavey. They just never figured out the tone stack/speaker combo like Marshall.Just Mike":1tq342ag said:The amp's got plenty of low end if I want it. I've found that playing out with my band I need to roll back the low end to make the overall mix less muddy. And I've got plenty of EQ options in the GT-10 processor if I need to do so. Also remember the JSX has an active EQ. I'm running the Bass on 4, Mids on 3.5 and treble on 6-7 on the crunch channel. Bass on 4, mids on 5 and treble on 6-7 on the Ultra channel. I do have a patch on the GT with a parametric mid hump around 800hz and a HPF at about 100hz for that 80's Hair metal HONK ala Stryper. My band has a pretty big PA system and the Bass & drums move some air so if I have too much low end in the guitar rig the bottom end can get pretty overwhelming.
Chester Nimitz":q5kzey5n said:Muddy low end is classic Peavey. They just never figured out the tone stack/speaker combo like Marshall.Just Mike":q5kzey5n said:The amp's got plenty of low end if I want it. I've found that playing out with my band I need to roll back the low end to make the overall mix less muddy. And I've got plenty of EQ options in the GT-10 processor if I need to do so. Also remember the JSX has an active EQ. I'm running the Bass on 4, Mids on 3.5 and treble on 6-7 on the crunch channel. Bass on 4, mids on 5 and treble on 6-7 on the Ultra channel. I do have a patch on the GT with a parametric mid hump around 800hz and a HPF at about 100hz for that 80's Hair metal HONK ala Stryper. My band has a pretty big PA system and the Bass & drums move some air so if I have too much low end in the guitar rig the bottom end can get pretty overwhelming.