
Zachalou
Active member
napalmdeath":3j1nxaup said:Zachalou":3j1nxaup said:Sure, bear in mind this is just my opinion, the satan 50 was not a bad amp at all, just not what I expected or wantedSpeeddemon":3j1nxaup said:Can you elaborate on the sound?Zachalou":3j1nxaup said:I don’t know anything about that company, but I owned the Satan 50 and felt it didn’t really sound good at band volumes
The satan has a ton of gain on tap, way more saturation and cut, it's a very bright amp. But as soon as I got it up to band volumes it just thinned out no matter how I set the EQ, and personally I like a big fat sounding tone so it just wasn't for me. I feel like the 120 satan would probably be better for me with the additional EQ options. Also important to note that I was playing a six string guitar set in standard E tuning, most people say the Satan is designed more for down tuned stuff so could be I just didn't give it a proper test. It sat in a mix very well but on it's own I just didn't feel like I had the power of grayskull when I played it.
I sold it and bought a Thrasher 50, which I think sounds and feels bigger, had some tube issues with the stock tubes but after getting a matched set of tung sols it really has become a beast
I've had the Thrasher 50 on my radar for about 2 years. I just can't find one at the right price.
Mine is the only used one for sale on reverb right now, I love the amp but I've been gassing for a jp-2c and I'm selling off several pieces of gear to get there, if you are interested take a look https://reverb.com/item/16526596-randal ... er-50-watt