Rick Beato on Fender Controversy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Geo
  • Start date Start date
There are probably enough Fender Strats already out there to have one in every household. If everyone who wanted a Strat bought used, Fender would make zero profit. Ha.
 
He's full of shit. Heres why:

"Fender have alienated everyone thats ever bought a Fender strat"

I dont feel alienated. Why would I? I like my strat. Thats it.

"People dont want to be seen with a Fender branded guitar."

Makes no difference to me whatsoever, and if I ever play anywhere, the 3 people that come to watch wont care either. If it alienates me from these music industry/influencer types, then all the better!

"Fender have destroyed the trust of their customers"

I bought my American Standard Strat in 1998, because I liked it. It was nothing got to do with whether I trusted the company. Yes, it had a reputation but after playing it, I liked it.

And...None of my guitar heros gave a shit either.

---------------

So far removed from the average dude in the street, and illogical.
Yeah, I couldn’t give a shit about it either. But I do agree with a Rick that their playability is for shit. I’ve been picking up Strats off the racks on and off for the last few months and haven’t found one that played as a keeper.
 
The quality control in the 70's, 80's and 90's was worse than it is now.
I have to agree with this. The Ultra Luxe Vintage I bought earlier this year is light years ahead of the 90s MIA fat strat (was it a "Lone Star"? Can't remember) that was the first guitar I ever bought.

I'm still fairly pissed at Fender though. I care a lot more about Anderson, Suhr, ESP, hell even PRS than I care about Fender.
 
Why should anyone that bought an actual fender feel alienated ?

And 99.9% of players will never hear about this “controversy”

Fender just waited 50 years too long. It just seems silly to put the toothpaste back in at this point.
 
I have no problem with what Fender is doing. I wonder what the reaction would be if Marshall went after all of the companies making amps that look like a Marshall.
 
I have to agree with this. The Ultra Luxe Vintage I bought earlier this year is light years ahead of the 90s MIA fat strat (was it a "Lone Star"? Can't remember) that was the first guitar I ever bought.

I'm still fairly pissed at Fender though. I care a lot more about Anderson, Suhr, ESP, hell even PRS than I care about Fender.
The Ultra's are a step above but consistency is shit, lots of problems.
 
I always assumed that the Ultra Series was their answer to the Suhr's and Andertons's of the world.
That's my assumption. I A/Bed it against a couple Suhrs and my stainless refretted PRS EG3 (which is a pretty awesome rare strat type guitar) and it played about as well.
 
Last edited:
I'd like to see Fender get ownership of the Strat body design.

Some makers have made new and different derivatives which won't be pursued by Fender. Other makers have really made close copy / knockoffs that are so close it would be hard to tell them apart just from the body, or without seeing the neck, neck-join, inlays or even headstock.

How close they match or don't from a jury of non-guitar players in court? Who knows. Are the distinct differences sufficient to tell them apart? Who knows.

I'm not a strat expert, though I've owned a few over the years...if you put several Strat-style bodies side by side, I'd be able to tell some maybe, not all...

1780684807628.png


Guess we'll see eventually.

I own a Fender Strat and Jag; both are just fine for my needs.
 
Once I realized that he didn't know Fender owns Charvel and makes EVH's- I had to fade out on this. Then the rant about them coming after Allan Holdsworth and the only good thing that came out of that was that he actually made ME feel young for a few minutes with his ill informed, not grounded in reality old man rant. And I'm 60 years old. Allan Holdsworth? He's usually on point but this was a rare swing and a miss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo
Fender hasn’t even existed in my mind fir like 30 years . Not a company a care for
Guitars or Amps . Just because your first doesn’t mean great . I mean any product I buy from then would have to be heavily modified . Too much work for me . So I kinda just ignore them
Good stuff . Just not for me at all
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo
The trend over the past 20 or so years is to hate large successful corporations. Kinda like how that Luigi creep killed the healthcare ceo and has tons of support for it.

People love to hate on Gibson, Fender, Harley-Davidson, Wal-Mart, Tesla, etc…

It’s fake rage and it’s silly and annoying. Probably based in jealousy more than anything else.
 
The trend over the past 20 or so years is to hate large successful corporations. Kinda like how that Luigi creep killed the healthcare ceo and has tons of support for it.

People love to hate on Gibson, Fender, Harley-Davidson, Wal-Mart, Tesla, etc…

It’s fake rage and it’s silly and annoying. Probably based in jealousy more than anything else.

It is possible to still appreciate (or love) an instrument and yet disagree with their decisions. Hell, I disagree with some of Dave Friedman's opinions on things, but that wouldn't stop me from buying an amp from him.
 
i’m boycotting the yt clickbait tirades on this subject. what would be hilarious is fender going after these pontificators for defamation.

but my brother in law told me a great story yesterday. his famiy moved to Fullerton when he was 8 and their church was connected to the Fender factory so they actually had to walk though the doors of the Fender property to get to the front of the church.
when no one was looking, he would grab a fistful of steel ball bearings for his slingshot, which the factory used to burnish their parts.
i told him he shoulda nabbed some pickups!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Geo

Similar threads

D
Replies
10
Views
2K
CarlF
CarlF
D
Replies
1
Views
282
thegame
thegame
D
Replies
10
Views
2K
legend71
L
311boogieman
Replies
31
Views
4K
The~Kid
The~Kid
Back
Top