Riley Gaines: The Real Woman of the Year

[Dan Gleesak]

Probably, because fear doesn't really have anything to do with it.
One group wants to pretend people are somehow afraid of xyz, while the other side is like no....it's just disgusting.
It's a pointless thing to throw out there.

I honestly don’t love the phrase, and barely ever use it.
but in the case of this thread it’s pretty topical and super ironic

 

[Wetordry]

I honestly don’t love the phrase, and barely ever use it.
but in the case of this thread it’s pretty topical and super ironic

Ok, ironic or satirical I get.
But generally, it's an attempt to end discussion and as such, useless.
Might as well toss a fucking Hitler in there.

 

[ccn]

I’m cool with him too. Try not to think too hard about things

Yeah right , you're cool with him lol.

 

[ccn]

No it’s a thing. I did not make it up. Nor do I really care.
It just came to mind that the Op pushed transgendered as a mental disorder when the reality is that most everyone of us posting in this thread also has a mental disorder one way or another

Wrong . People who think there are more than two genders have a mental disorder.


Top Psychiatrist: Today’s Left Are Mentally Ill

"According to veteran psychiatrist Dr. Lyle Rossiter, leftists are suffering from a form of psychosis, comically nicknamed ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome".

“Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded,”

"For decades he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago"

"Rossiter says today’s liberalism, as displayed by the likes of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton throughout the previous administration, as well as by today’s Democratic Party leaders and the increasingly hysterical “mainstream media,” can only be understood as a psychological disorder"

“Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do,” he says.

“A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do".

"And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation’s citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do.”

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

Creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization:

Satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation:

Augmenting primitive feelings of envy:

Rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government:

“The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind,” he says.

“When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.”

https://www.wnd.com/2018/08/veteran-psychiatrist-calls-left-mentally-ill/

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Yeah right , you're cool with him lol.

Yep

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

Is there anything you WOULDN'T fuck is my question because you seem to want to tap anything and everything and I mean that in a good way of course . Just be careful

@ccn Nah, I wouldn't fuck anything................I ONLY do it to rouse up the woke soft cocks on here and as we can see TGPer's deliver as USUAL.

@Aynirar27 Homophobia is a 100% legitimate decision to make.........there is NO fear and there is NO being irrational whatsoever.
It is a 'choice'.......plain and simple. We are wired by nature to procreate and NOT just fornicate. Nature wires us to lay with the other sex........... I don't make the rules..........nature is immovable.

To even suggest homophobia is fear and irrational is vile and perverse in itself.

Is homosexuality a mental illness? No, it is simply a level of perversion that some need to get off with. Without it, they can't.
Some couples need dress ups, some couples need dirty talk, some couples need a 'little' violence. Gays need the thought of fucking the same sex to get off. You'll ALWAYS notice that gays and lesbos need to role play heterosexual roles in their sex............think about that.

In fact...........I'd go so far to say that homosexuality in the conventional sense does NOT exist. The fact that they role play heterosexual acts by both gays and lesbos I see it as a level of perversion required to be satisfied.

The mental illness part is the mincy gays speaking like women and wanting constant attention like a prized poodle..............now THERE IS a mental problem with that.

It is the 100% right of any and all people to NOT tolerate the action of gays as again...............nature makes the rules.

A clear example is you could watch straight sex porn and be aroused and continue watching. Nature has you wired to be repulsed by watching gay porn and for a REASON. Nature does not want gays and lesbos as the world is not built by that or on that. It simply could not exist if it did.

So, if the moving social construct forces you to accept the gays/lesbos etc that does not make it physically and mentally right as once again, nature has different and over riding rules that cannot be challenged nor changed. There are limits in the world yet the gay community refuses to acknowledge and accept them. They are trying to contort reality any way they can and THERE is the mental illness.

 

[Picasso]

@ccn Nah, I wouldn't fuck anything................I ONLY do it to rouse up the woke soft cocks on here and as we can see TGPer's deliver as USUAL.

@Aynirar27 Homophobia is a 100% legitimate decision to make.........there is NO fear and there is NO being irrational whatsoever.
It is a 'choice'.......plain and simple. We are wired by nature to procreate and NOT just fornicate. Nature wires us to lay with the other sex........... I don't make the rules..........nature is immovable.

To even suggest homophobia is fear and irrational is vile and perverse in itself.

Is homosexuality a mental illness? No, it is simply a level of perversion that some need to get off with. Without it, they can't.
Some couples need dress ups, some couples need dirty talk, some couples need a 'little' violence. Gays need the thought of fucking the same sex to get off. You'll ALWAYS notice that gays and lesbos need to role play heterosexual roles in their sex............think about that.

In fact...........I'd go so far to say that homosexuality in the conventional sense does NOT exist. The fact that they role play heterosexual acts by both gays and lesbos I see it as a level of perversion required to be satisfied.

The mental illness part is the mincy gays speaking like women and wanting constant attention like a prized poodle..............now THERE IS a mental problem with that.

It is the 100% right of any and all people to NOT tolerate the action of gays as again...............nature makes the rules.

A clear example is you could watch straight sex porn and be aroused and continue watching. Nature has you wired to be repulsed by watching gay porn and for a REASON. Nature does not want gays and lesbos as the world is not built by that or on that. It simply could not exist if it did.

So, if the moving social construct forces you to accept the gays/lesbos etc that does not make it physically and mentally right as once again, nature has different and over riding rules that cannot be challenged nor changed. There are limits in the world yet the gay community refuses to acknowledge and accept them. They are trying to contort reality any way they can.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

@ccn Nah, I wouldn't fuck anything................I ONLY do it to rouse up the woke soft cocks on here and as we can see TGPer's deliver as USUAL.

@Aynirar27 Homophobia is a 100% legitimate decision to make.........there is NO fear and there is NO being irrational whatsoever.
It is a 'choice'.......plain and simple. We are wired by nature to procreate and NOT just fornicate. Nature wires us to lay with the other sex........... I don't make the rules..........nature is immovable.

To even suggest homophobia is fear and irrational is vile and perverse in itself.

Is homosexuality a mental illness? No, it is simply a level of perversion that some need to get off with. Without it, they can't.
Some couples need dress ups, some couples need dirty talk, some couples need a 'little' violence. Gays need the thought of fucking the same sex to get off. You'll ALWAYS notice that gays and lesbos need to role play heterosexual roles in their sex............think about that.

In fact...........I'd go so far to say that homosexuality in the conventional sense does NOT exist. The fact that they role play heterosexual acts by both gays and lesbos I see it as a level of perversion required to be satisfied.

The mental illness part is the mincy gays speaking like women and wanting constant attention like a prized poodle..............now THERE IS a mental problem with that.

It is the 100% right of any and all people to NOT tolerate the action of gays as again...............nature makes the rules.

A clear example is you could watch straight sex porn and be aroused and continue watching. Nature has you wired to be repulsed by watching gay porn and for a REASON. Nature does not want gays and lesbos as the world is not built by that or on that. It simply could not exist if it did.

So, if the moving social construct forces you to accept the gays/lesbos etc that does not make it physically and mentally right as once again, nature has different and over riding rules that cannot be challenged nor changed. There are limits in the world yet the gay community refuses to acknowledge and accept them. They are trying to contort reality any way they can.

I actually agree with a lot of that. I’ll admit “homophobia” was a poor choice of words when they started talking about it in the 60s, but that doesn’t change what it actually means. And what it does not mean is a “fear” of anything. It make sense why many would think that it does, but it most certainly does not.

And I’ve actually had a lot of conversations with people about how homosexuality is inherently “wrong” when it comes to the general idea of the sustainability of a species.
But that also opens the doors to heterosexual couples that decide to not have children, or a sterile man or woman who cannot conceive. If one is ok with saying that a gay person is useless or harmful to society, they also have to be prepared to say any adult that chooses to not have children is equally useless or problematic. If not, the root of the ideology is a problem with homosexuality itself, and THAT is homophobia

The truth is that it’s 2023. There are no shortage of humans. A human’s role in society no longer necessitates reproduction. Add to that, any lesbian couple that wants to get pregnant, still can.

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

I actually agree with a lot of that. I’ll admit “homophobia” was a poor choice of words when they started talking about it in the 60s, but that doesn’t change what it actually means. And what it does not mean is a “fear” of anything. It make sense why many would think that it does, but it most certainly does not.

And I’ve actually had a lot of conversations with people about how homosexuality is inherently “wrong” when it comes to the general idea of the sustainability of a species.
But that also opens the doors to heterosexual couples that decide to not have children, or a sterile man or woman who cannot conceive. If one is ok with saying that a gay person is useless or harmful to society, they also have to be prepared to say any adult that chooses to not have children is equally useless or problematic. If not, the root of the ideology is a problem with homosexuality itself, and THAT is homophobia

The truth is that it’s 2023. There are no shortage of humans. A human’s role in society no longer necessitates reproduction. Add to that, any lesbian couple that wants to get pregnant, still can.

@Aynirar27 Heterosexuals choosing not to have children is a momentary decision and not an absolute (as their reproductive timeline has not fully elapsed) or an act against nature at that time. So no, the view on this is incorrect.

Again, homophobia is a choice backed up by nature so there is nothing sinister in the term or action.

Lesbians getting pregnant and having children not reared by a female AND male is against nature also. Nature is the ultimate owner of 'balance' and it dictates what is balanced and what isn't. Men and Women cojoined are that balance...............by solid and necessary design to perpetuate.

We live in a time where morals and reality are off the rails because of greed and self entitlement and mental disorders being allowed to roam amongst the majority of normal functioning people. Humans are social creatures and the powers that be understand that social pressure (good and bad) can affect and influence. This is a man made construct and not always nature's intention as we see more everyday and everywhere.

The old saying, "give them an inch and they'll take a mile" This is why the pushback of gays and the rest of them needs to be exercised as it's not publicly acceptable in a normal functioning society as it's destructive as currently proven.

I see no reason why there isn't an area where they can all move to and stay amongst themselves. They'd be happy and the vast majority of us (the majority) would be too. We keep animals separate for a reason so why not this lot.

 

[Wetordry]

@Aynirar27 Heterosexuals choosing not to have children is a momentary decision and not an absolute (as their reproductive timeline has not fully elapsed) or an act against nature at that time. So no, the view on this is incorrect.

Again, homophobia is a choice backed up by nature so there is nothing sinister in the term or action.

Lesbians getting pregnant and having children not reared by a female AND male is against nature also. Nature is the ultimate owner of 'balance' and it dictates what is balanced and what isn't. Men and Women cojoined are that balance...............by solid and necessary design to perpetuate.

We live in a time where morals and reality are off the rails because of greed and self entitlement and mental disorders being allowed to roam amongst the majority of normal functioning people. Humans are social creatures and the powers that be understand that social pressure (good and bad) can affect and influence. This is a man made construct and not always nature's intention as we see more everyday and everywhere.

The old saying, "give them an inch and they'll take a mile" This is why the pushback of gays and the rest of them needs to be exercised as it's not publicly acceptable in a normal functioning society as it's destructive as currently proven.

I see no reason why there isn't an area where they can all move to and stay amongst themselves. They'd be happy and the vast majority of us (the majority) would be too. We keep animals separate for a reason so why not this lot.

*Pulls grenade pin...

Maybe the Annunaki tossed in an aberrant random homo gene to keep the peeps confused?

 

[Dan Gleesak]

@Aynirar27 Heterosexuals choosing not to have children is a momentary decision and not an absolute (as their reproductive timeline has not fully elapsed) or an act against nature at that time. So no, the view on this is incorrect.

Again, homophobia is a choice backed up by nature so there is nothing sinister in the term or action.

Lesbians getting pregnant and having children not reared by a female AND male is against nature also. Nature is the ultimate owner of 'balance' and it dictates what is balanced and what isn't. Men and Women cojoined are that balance...............by solid and necessary design to perpetuate.

We live in a time where morals and reality are off the rails because of greed and self entitlement and mental disorders being allowed to roam amongst the majority of normal functioning people. Humans are social creatures and the powers that be understand that social pressure (good and bad) can affect and influence. This is a man made construct and not always nature's intention as we see more everyday and everywhere.

The old saying, "give them an inch and they'll take a mile" This is why the pushback of gays and the rest of them needs to be exercised as it's not publicly acceptable in a normal functioning society as it's destructive as currently proven.

I see no reason why there isn't an area where they can all move to and stay amongst themselves. They'd be happy and the vast majority of us (the majority) would be too. We keep animals separate for a reason so why not this lot.

It’s not quite as simple as that though. The way the animal kingdom raises their young varies drastically. Some may have male/female pairing, but many are raised by only the female, and some not at all. They drop some eggs and peace the fuck out.

And while humans are undoubtedly “animals”, we are far detached from “the way of the wild” and natural selection/survival of the fittest. In fact we are the complete opposite in many areas.

The crux of the whole equality thing is this:

it’s fine if two dudes making out grosses you out. Not everyone has to like everyone else. I personally can’t stand people that wear earphones in public. The difference is that I’m not trying to deny those filthy earphone wearers things like getting married or raising a family.

Equal rights doesn’t mean you have to like anybody, just that they aren’t legally treated like a lesser citizen.

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

It’s not quite as simple as that though. The way the animal kingdom raises their young varies drastically. Some may have male/female pairing, but many are raised by only the female, and some not at all. They drop some eggs and peace the fuck out.

And while humans are undoubtedly “animals”, we are far detached from “the way of the wild” and natural selection/survival of the fittest. In fact we are the complete opposite in many areas.

The crux of the whole equality thing is this:

it’s fine if two dudes making out grosses you out. Not everyone has to like everyone else. I personally can’t stand people that wear earphones in public. The difference is that I’m not trying to deny those filthy earphone wearers things like getting married or raising a family.

Equal rights doesn’t mean you have to like anybody, just that they aren’t legally treated like a lesser citizen.

@Aynirar27 Yes, it is that simple. We make it grey for our lack of understanding and social convenience, nature does not.

I believe you've missed the point today...................................maybe another day you'll see things differently.

In the meantime.........................go fuck yourself.

 

[2ncicu]

I see no reason why there isn't an area where they can all move to and stay amongst themselves. They'd be happy and the vast majority of us (the majority) would be too. We keep animals separate for a reason so why not this lot.

LOL! Maybe the moon and they can raise Unicorns for export- huge market for them on the Liberal front.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

@Aynirar27 Yes, it is that simple. We make it grey for our lack of understanding and social convenience, nature does not.

I believe you've missed the point today...................................maybe another day you'll see things differently.

In the meantime.........................go fuck yourself.

The thing that makes humans differ from other animals is that we don’t necessarily adapt to our surroundings, we adapt our surroundings to us.
Natural selection does not apply to us.

The levels of what attracts one human to another human is so deeply varied, that is no common trait. Even if you only look at heterosexuals, there is no common trait. Adding in homosexuality does not murk the already murky waters of human sexuality.

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

The thing that makes humans differ from other animals is that we don’t necessarily adapt to our surroundings, we adapt our surroundings to us.
Natural selection does not apply to us.

The levels of what attracts one human to another human is so deeply varied, that is no common trait. Even if you only look at heterosexuals, there is no common trait. Adding in homosexuality does not murk the already murky waters of human sexuality.

@Aynirar27 Okay, I'll bite.

We're in a constant fight against nature for our surroundings.....................weeds grow, weather seasons affect, leave a place in a paddock unattended and nature will over grow on it. So, we only adapt our surroundings for a moment as nature is against us and we perform constant anti nature maintenance to stay in the same place and not move on like animals do.

Human attraction? Each race and culture is mostly attracted to their own kind. Sure, there are variances but most of them fail over the long run.
Indians with Indians, blacks with blacks, Asians with Asians etc...It's only a small minority where different nationalities and cultures occur.

Multiculturism is a total failure, we're different for a reason and again, mankind trying to obliterate nature's plan and intention.

Everything you're posting is in support of a man made social construct............................... as you've been taught.

So again.......................FUCK YOU!

 

[Beater]

@Aynirar27 Heterosexuals choosing not to have children is a momentary decision and not an absolute (as their reproductive timeline has not fully elapsed) or an act against nature at that time. So no, the view on this is incorrect.

Again, homophobia is a choice backed up by nature so there is nothing sinister in the term or action.

Lesbians getting pregnant and having children not reared by a female AND male is against nature also. Nature is the ultimate owner of 'balance' and it dictates what is balanced and what isn't. Men and Women cojoined are that balance...............by solid and necessary design to perpetuate.

We live in a time where morals and reality are off the rails because of greed and self entitlement and mental disorders being allowed to roam amongst the majority of normal functioning people. Humans are social creatures and the powers that be understand that social pressure (good and bad) can affect and influence. This is a man made construct and not always nature's intention as we see more everyday and everywhere.

The old saying, "give them an inch and they'll take a mile" This is why the pushback of gays and the rest of them needs to be exercised as it's not publicly acceptable in a normal functioning society as it's destructive as currently proven.

I see no reason why there isn't an area where they can all move to and stay amongst themselves. They'd be happy and the vast majority of us (the majority) would be too. We keep animals separate for a reason so why not this lot.

You are fucked up.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

@Aynirar27 Okay, I'll bite.

We're in a constant fight against nature for our surroundings.....................weeds grow, weather seasons affect, leave a place in a paddock unattended and nature will over grow on it. So, we only adapt our surroundings for a moment as nature is against us and we perform constant anti nature maintenance to stay in the same place and not move on like animals do.

Human attraction? Each race and culture is mostly attracted to their own kind. Sure, there are variances but most of them fail over the long run.
Indians with Indians, blacks with blacks, Asians with Asians etc...It's only a small minority where different nationalities and cultures occur.

Multiculturism is a total failure, we're different for a reason and again, mankind trying to obliterate nature's plan and intention.

Everything you're posting is in support of a man made social construct............................... as you've been taught.

So again.......................FUCK YOU!

i dunno man, I think we are having two very different conversations.

 

[Beater]

i dunno man, I think we are having two very different conversations.

Nope. You both are showing everyone that he is homophobic. Lol

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

You are fucked up.

@Beater When your IQ reaches 25 come back and speak then............until then STOP fucking your dog and looking through the keyhole pervng on your mom. You know it's a NO NO.

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

Nope. You both are showing everyone that he is homophobic. Lol

@Beater I'm certainly Homophobic so, thank you.

Unlike you, sucking a man's dick and eating shit off it doesn't thrill me in the slightest.

Hey, isn't your father now gay? You should be proud as you're all for the pillow biting.

Keep sucking and gargling ....................enjoy it all fuckhead.