So, who's looking like they're facing jail time?

[Bagel and Creamcheese]

I'm thinking the golden shitter is getting a hard workout at Mar-A-Lardass right about now.

Hahahahahah.

Malaria is thinking about where she'll live after she takes half his money in the divorce. St Tropez maybe. Monaco?

 

[japetus]

Sir, this is a Wendys.

 

[Ben Waylin]

Anyways, here's Wonderwall.

 

[JackTheBear]

They Got him now, Donnie??

 

[Dave M]

 

[311boogieman]

Sir, this is a Wendys.

Wendy's is now one of my favorite fast food places because their potatoes and chili (quite good) are guaranteed gluten free.

 

[psychodave]

OMG Smith is using a law from 1866 that was meant to punish Klan terrorism.

??????????

Could the DC cesspool be any more pathetic and desperate?

Next: Trump will be indicted for violating the Mosaic Law and Hammurabi’s code. ?

 

[Dan Gleesak]

OMG Smith is using a law from 1866 that was meant to punish Klan terrorism.

??????????

Could the DC cesspool be any more pathetic and desperate?

Next: Trump will be indicted for violating the Mosaic Law and Hammurabi’s code. ?

More current than the second amendment

 

[Wetordry]

 

[Ben Waylin]

In other news: Obama fired his chef.

 

[Stripped Rights]

More current than the second amendment

Beat me to it!

 

[ccn]

LOVE IT

 

[WEF Chairman]

LOVE IT

View attachment 231697

Everyone is going to flip on him.

 

[JackTheBear]

LOVE IT

View attachment 231697

??

 

[CrazyNutz]

I'm thinking the golden shitter is getting a hard workout at Mar-A-Lardass right about now.

And he doesn't even have all those boxes full of classified reading material, bummer

 

[CrazyNutz]

FBI has 95% conviction rate, I'm sure he'll be fine

 

[JackTheBear]

Anyways, here's Wonderwall.

Great tune?

 

[ccn]

Mike Robinson
August 1, 2023 10:28 pm


The death-knell for … not only this, but several “indictments” … is as follows:
The core Duty of The President, as set in Article 2, is to “take care that the Laws are faithfully executed.” Which he must do as he sees fit, and without regard to where “the transgression(s)” might have occurred.
And:
“The President of the United States” is “The Article-2 Executive Branch.” Not “a private individual.”
Therefore, in the execution of His Office as He alone(!) sees it, the Executive Branch can “do as He damned well pleases.” He can speak to anyone, and say whatever He likes, “off the cuff.” He can “declassify” anything just by referring to it in conversation or taking it out the door.
“Separation of Powers.” “Plenary Powers.”
It literally does not matter what “you” think about it, no matter who “you” are.
(Your only legal option is “impeachment,” which – as the Constitution is very careful to point out – is not(!) a criminal verdict.)
And, IMHO, it’s high time that [Former] President Trump take his case directly to the Supreme Court (this being his “Court of Primary Jurisdiction”), to formally ask them to re-affirm what they have already decided, several times before. “This is settled law!”

 

[ccn]

Special Counsel Jack Smith held a press conference today following the unsealing of a federal criminal indictment alleging four counts against President Donald J Trump. [Full Indictment pdf Link]​

The four alleged criminal counts are: (1) Conspiracy to defraud the U.S Government; (2) Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding; (3) Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding; and (4) Conspiracy against Rights.

Interestingly, nowhere in the indictment is anything criminally alleged relating to the January 6, 2021, events at the U.S. Capitol building in Washington DC. However, you will notice in the Lawfare delivery of the remarks, Special Counsel Jack Smith factually speaks almost exclusively of the January 6th events.

The absence of a criminal charge (ie. seditious conspiracy or insurrection) when contrast against the extreme verbal emphasis of the event as outlined by Smith in the presser, will be missed by most. Speaking of the non-criminal event as the context for a fabricated/stretched criminal allegation, is Lawfare in action. Why emphasize but not charge? Because the DOJ/FBI does not want the risk of litigated discovery and evidence of coordinated government activity therein, that’s why.

Jack Smith knows he is out on a limb with his Lawfare effort to criminalize the legal and constitutional challenge to an election outcome. He is nervous, WATCH:

The brighter the sunlight falling upon government corruption and weaponization, the more those who perpetrate corruption and weaponization will have to shield against it.

At this point in history these attacks against President Donald Trump are Lawfare members sticking fingers and toes into the cracks of a justice dam that is increasingly unstable and about to collapse. The pressure on the other side is the dam is the collective anger of We The People, and when that dam breaks no pre-positioned scuba gear is going to protect them.

Continue living your very best life. Do not let yourself or your family fall victim to the fear of dark imaginings. However, look beyond our current proximity and keep your eyes open for any/all constructs that can be repurposed to protect government interests through physical lock downs.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...testing-results-of-2020-election/#more-249459

 

[Bagel and Creamcheese]

Mike Robinson
August 1, 2023 10:28 pm


The death-knell for … not only this, but several “indictments” … is as follows:
The core Duty of The President, as set in Article 2, is to “take care that the Laws are faithfully executed.” Which he must do as he sees fit, and without regard to where “the transgression(s)” might have occurred.

And he broke those laws. It says nothing about him being above the law. So, point #1 = debunked. You should read for meaning not confirmation of false bias.

“The President of the United States” is “The Article-2 Executive Branch.” Not “a private individual.”
Therefore, in the execution of His Office as He alone(!) sees it, the Executive Branch can “do as He damned well pleases.” He can speak to anyone, and say whatever He likes, “off the cuff.” He can “declassify” anything just by referring to it in conversation or taking it out the door.

Again, NO, he cannot declassify anything by waving his magic wand. There is a procedure that MUST be followed. That procedure wasn't followed. Further, he was given ample opportunity to return said documents. If he would have, this wouldn't have even made the news. He refused, in fact claiming he never had them and supposedly trying to destroy evidence. He's an arrogant fool who hung himself.