J
Jimty
Well-known member
Spotted a few Soldano Decatones and HR100+s (XL and non-XL) for sale recently. I’ve done some digging and views seem to be split between those who say they are a poor imitation of the SLO and should be avoided, and those who say they are great amps if taken on their own merits (ie: not strictly viewed as SLOs on a budget).
Quite a lot of commentary seems to come from folks who haven’t owned/played the amps. Also, some of the reviews are getting on a bit and as we all know fashions and opinions change over time: (eg: Rev Gs were looked down on for years compared to earlier revisions but seem to be having a resurgence in respect and positive views on the Mesa Stiletto are more common than they used to be).
So I was wondering what the consensus on these amps is these days - I’d be interested to hear from those who own them / have owned them / have spent decent time with them.
Also, given the choice and if prices are equal, which would you go for purely on the basis of the quality of the amp build and the quality of the tone(s) available? I’m ignoring here the added functionality and channels of the Deca and the fact that the HR100 is by design brighter and more open than the slightly darker and more compressed Deca. Is it just a case of picking whichever provides the type of tone and feel you want or is one amp “better” in terms of build and tone quality than the other? For instance, I’ve read that the HRs are “2D” tonally vs the SLO “3D” but haven’t seen a similar criticism of the Deca - just that it’s a different beast to the SLO.
Quite a lot of commentary seems to come from folks who haven’t owned/played the amps. Also, some of the reviews are getting on a bit and as we all know fashions and opinions change over time: (eg: Rev Gs were looked down on for years compared to earlier revisions but seem to be having a resurgence in respect and positive views on the Mesa Stiletto are more common than they used to be).
So I was wondering what the consensus on these amps is these days - I’d be interested to hear from those who own them / have owned them / have spent decent time with them.
Also, given the choice and if prices are equal, which would you go for purely on the basis of the quality of the amp build and the quality of the tone(s) available? I’m ignoring here the added functionality and channels of the Deca and the fact that the HR100 is by design brighter and more open than the slightly darker and more compressed Deca. Is it just a case of picking whichever provides the type of tone and feel you want or is one amp “better” in terms of build and tone quality than the other? For instance, I’ve read that the HRs are “2D” tonally vs the SLO “3D” but haven’t seen a similar criticism of the Deca - just that it’s a different beast to the SLO.