Speaker mixes in a 412: My thoughts and some advice wanted.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MadAsAHatter
  • Start date Start date
MadAsAHatter

MadAsAHatter

Well-known member
I’ve been swapping speakers around seeing which configurations worked for me. First, I want to share my experiences so far. And secondly want to get some advice on greenback style speakers.

Experiences thus far.
I had a few different types of speakers to work with:
Egnater Elite 100 (rebadged G12K-100)
Eganter Elite 75 (rebadged G12T-75)
Celestion badged G12T-75
WGS ET-65
WGS ET90
WGS Retro 30
Celestion 70/80

And my thoughts on the different speaker configurations I tried all in a 412 cabinet. I’ve listed them in the order of my liking from least to most:

I’ll get this one out the way first, the 70/80’s didn’t sound overly spectacular with any other speaker. They’re okay at best on their own, but seemed to add a brittleness that didn’t mix well when paired with anything else.

For each speaker by itself I liked the ET-65 (ET90) Retro 30 and Elite 100 the most. They were the most full and natural sounding to me. Each had its own flavor and when taken alone none sounded like it was lacking anything. But side by side comparison one made the other appear to be lacking something. For example putting the ET against the Retro 30… The retro 30 being so mid forward made the ET seem like it was missing mids. And conversely the ET made it feel like the Retro 30 didn’t have anything going in the lows and highs.

Elite 75 quad – on its own it sounded pretty good, though a little scooped in the mids. Basically it’s exactly how you’d expect a quad of G12T75’s to sound. But when compared to something with more pronounced mids if felt like it was severely lacking in that department; like it didn’t have enough body.

Elite 100 x G12T75 – This combo was fuller sounding than the quad of Elite 75’s. The Elite 100’s filled in some of the missing pieces that were lacking in the G12T75’s. Again on it’s own it sounded just fine, but comparatively still sounded like it needed more mids to fill out.

G12T75 x ET-65 (ET-90) – I’m included the ET-90 in my comparison here as it sounded near similar to the ET-65. Separating the comparisons would have been redundant. Both the ET-65 and ET-90 did a good job in trying to make up for the G12T75. The ET’s added in some much needed mids and made the highs and lows sound fuller, but I felt like the ET’s were being dragged down by the G12T75’s. It seemed like the T75’s were adding this sterility that I just didn’t like.

G12T-75 x Retro 30 – These 2 speaker types complimented each other rather well. Each filled in what the other seemed to be lacking and produced a well-rounded sound. I left this pairing in for a while to see how well I bonded with it past the initial impression. I could work with this. But… though not as pronounced, like when paired with the ET’s the G12T-75’s added that same sterility I didn’t like.

Elite 100 x ET-65 (ET90) – This was a really good pairing also. The ET’s filled in some of the midrange and complimented the Elite 100’s in the highs and lows. It produced a well bodied sound. It was slightly mid scooped but not so much where it wouldn’t cut and get lost in a mix. If I wanted a slightly scooped sound that would still cut I could have easily stayed with this combo. But I wanted something a bit more mid forward than this was.

ET-65 (ET90) x Retro 30 – Okay now we’re cooking with animal fat. I can see why as far as WGS speakers go this is a popular and recommended pairing. They complement each other almost perfectly and together they sound bold and full. One fills in on what the other seems to be missing. I do find that mid frequencies of the ET and Retro 30 do overlap some so the mids stay prominent without being so in your face. There’s a bunch of discussions on this speaker pairing floating around so I don’t think my thoughts will add anything that hasn’t already been said. Basically you can’t go wrong with this. This mix has found a permanent home in one of my cabs and is near my favorite, but one combo did beat it out.

Elite 100 x Retro 30 – This is the speaker mix that gave me that Holy Shit! moment. The instant that first chord rang out I knew this was where it’s at. To me these two speakers complement each other so well. The sound is just so organic, bold, and full of life. I don’t feel like either is trying to make up for the other one. Each speaker seemed to contribute its own flavor that landed right where it should in the frequency mix. It’s like they were in sync performing a well-choreographed dance. This is my favorite combo, is in my main 412 cab, and is there to stay long term.
 
Now to the part where I’d like some advice. From the above, the 70/80 and Elite 75/G12T-75 just aren’t doing it for me so they’ll be heading out the door at some point. The ET-90 x Retro 30 and Elite 100 x Retro 30 are staying put where they’re at. Both speaker mixes are in the same vein, but are different enough where it’s not redundant. I have one more 412 cab to round out. I’ll be using the ET65’s I have and need to get 2 more of something. I’d like a quad of ET’s well enough, but want something a little more and also different enough from what I’ve already set.

I came across the video below of an ET-65 x Green Beret (WGS’s Greenback type) and really liked the way it sounded. It seemed to give that same full bodied sound that I like from the other speaker pairings I did, and sonically different enough to not be redundant. So I want to go for a Greenback type speaker but I’m not fully convinced that the Green Beret is the flavor I want.

Celestion obviously has their different Greenbacks and WGS has the Green Beret & Invader. I know Eminence and Scumback has done their take on Greenbacks, but I’m not sure which models those are. Can anyone help me out with describing some of the differences between these flavors of Greenback type speakers? And If you’ve ever paired one with and ET-65 (or G12-65) what did you think about that mix?
 
One piece of advice for you is, check the efficiency of the speakers and place them accordingly. Like with V30s and GBs..V30s on bottom and GBs on top so the V30s don’t overpower the GBs, like the Friedman cabs. Another would be 65s on bottom and GBs on top. X pattern, unless they are the same efficiency doesn’t work well imo. And WGS mixed with Celestions don’t work well imo when the WGS start to fall apart at high volume, and the Celestion doesn’t.
 
Best cab I’ve had to date was a Splawn with K100s and V30s in an X
 
Just took out Eminence Small block 55's in my Splawn, moved the other GB up top and put 2 V30's in bottom. Liking it so far and no plans of changing back.
 
The one thing I'll be able to contribute about mixed speaker cabs is that every "X pattern" cab I've ever tried has messed with me due to the Left / Right imbalance once you get anywhere close to them.

Top / Bottom pairs are much easier on the ears at all distances in my experience and in that case, always mount the louder speakers into the bottom slots.
 
It's been my experience that I have the best luck when I combine 2 different cabs.Ie: 1-4×12 w/ v30s and 1-4×12 w/ 65s...my buddy does it this way all the time..It never messes with your ears and when u stand out front of them it's a thing of tone beauty !
 
It's been my experience that I have the best luck when I combine 2 different cabs.Ie: 1-4×12 w/ v30s and 1-4×12 w/ 65s...my buddy does it this way all the time..It never messes with your ears and when u stand out front of them it's a thing of tone beauty !

This is my experience too. I actually think cabs don't sound quite as good with speaker mixes.
 
Agree 100%. I did X pattern many speaker types years ago; but depending on where you stood the tone would change too much. Running 2 or 4 separate cabs all with different speakers is my current preference.

Yeah man, i used to do the speaker mixing thing back in the day. The tone changes too much, and because of that it doesnt have quite the punch and impact IMO.
 
Agreed with the last 3 posts...if you got the cabs,I think that's the way to go.
 
Interesting comparison. My favourite cab is a 4x12 with 3x V30 and 1 ET90. The ET90 just makes it bigger and better than the v30s alone.
I tried a second cab next to it with v30s and one or two T75. The 75s are significantly quieter than the others and the cab overall sounds weaker.
 
Last edited:
One piece of advice for you is, check the efficiency of the speakers and place them accordingly. Like with V30s and GBs..V30s on bottom and GBs on top so the V30s don’t overpower the GBs, like the Friedman cabs. Another would be 65s on bottom and GBs on top. X pattern, unless they are the same efficiency doesn’t work well imo. And WGS mixed with Celestions don’t work well imo when the WGS start to fall apart at high volume, and the Celestion doesn’t.

I've seen you mention WGS speakers start to fall out at high volumes before. I've pushed mine about as loud as I would generally go; which is enough to be heard over a drummer, and haven's had them flub. Though I may not have pushed them quite far enough to reach that point. If I didn't already have the extra WGS speakers I'd go straight to Celestions, but since I have them I might as well use them. If I ever do get to a point where they're not working for me I'll rotate them out with Celestions.

The one thing I'll be able to contribute about mixed speaker cabs is that every "X pattern" cab I've ever tried has messed with me due to the Left / Right imbalance once you get anywhere close to them.

Top / Bottom pairs are much easier on the ears at all distances in my experience and in that case, always mount the louder speakers into the bottom slots.
This is my experience too. I actually think cabs don't sound quite as good with speaker mixes.
Yeah man, i used to do the speaker mixing thing back in the day. The tone changes too much, and because of that it doesnt have quite the punch and impact IMO.

That's interesting. This is my first run through with doing speaker mixes so my experiences are very limited, but I haven't noticed any drastic tone changes moving around. The only thing I hear is the change you get from being off axis. I used to have 2 412 cabs with V30's in one and 70/80's in the other. I got more of a tonal shift that way depending on which cab I was closer to when side-by-side or if stacked which one was on top.

The entire baffle on the Egnater cabs I'm using is tilted back several degrees so all the speakers are pointing more upwards at my ears. As opposed to a straight baffle where it's pointed at the waist down, or typical slant where half the speakers are pointed up towards the ears and the other at the ankles. I wonder if that has anything to do with having a better balance using the X pattern?
 
I only noticed the WGS flub when I picked up an SLO combo, unloaded…I bought a pair of ET65s since original 65s are a fav speaker of mine. They sounded really nice and almost spot on to a darker 83 slant with original 65s. But when I turned it up to 3,4 they farted out a bit even after reducing the lows. By contrast, none of my Celestion cabs reacted that way even with the master up past 5-7
 
That's interesting. This is my first run through with doing speaker mixes so my experiences are very limited, but I haven't noticed any drastic tone changes moving around. The only thing I hear is the change you get from being off axis. I used to have 2 412 cabs with V30's in one and 70/80's in the other. I got more of a tonal shift that way depending on which cab I was closer to when side-by-side or if stacked which one was on top.

The entire baffle on the Egnater cabs I'm using is tilted back several degrees so all the speakers are pointing more upwards at my ears. As opposed to a straight baffle where it's pointed at the waist down, or typical slant where half the speakers are pointed up towards the ears and the other at the ankles. I wonder if that has anything to do with having a better balance using the X pattern?

Just for clarification, I think "two speakers of type A on top, two speakers of type B on bottom" is fine. It's specifically the cabs with X pattern loaded speakers that mess with me. :)
 
I also much prefer top / bottom over x pattern. I don't like x pattern at all.
 
I also much prefer top / bottom over x pattern. I don't like x pattern at all.
i'm in the same boat. x patterns get "blury" for lack of better word, some times. i'm thinking about turning my 1960a into a top/bottom set up in setero, so that i can eq more low end into the bottom pair (almost like subs), and something ear pleasing, and balanced to the angled upper speakers. Then either mic the top by iteself, or if i want to get anal, MIC both with my own mics, into a small line mixer in my rig, and send THAT to the board....if i ever gig again.
 
i'm in the same boat. x patterns get "blury" for lack of better word, some times. i'm thinking about turning my 1960a into a top/bottom set up in setero, so that i can eq more low end into the bottom pair (almost like subs), and something ear pleasing, and balanced to the angled upper speakers. Then either mic the top by iteself, or if i want to get anal, MIC both with my own mics, into a small line mixer in my rig, and send THAT to the board....if i ever gig again.
I need to get like 30 feet from x pattern to start sounding normal. I don't play on stages that big often.
 
I'm on board with the two separate 4x12 argument- in fact that's what I'm building now. One preamp, two power amps and two cabs. In my case with the V30 cab & the T75 cab (thanks Jim!) this allows me to balance the volume since the V30s are notably louder. When I do this, it sounds GLORIOUS. It's the most full, deep & amazing tone I've had to date in the band mix. Here's an isolated example I recently put together.

 
I've been contemplating this speaker mixing thing more and have decided for simplicity's sake I'd rather just use 1 type of speaker in the 412 to replace the T75's. I know the sound I'm going for but don't know which speaker would fit it best.

This video is of a WGS Green Beret & ET-65 mix, but I'm hoping to be guided toward a speaker that sounds close to this by itself. Jump to 2:25 to skip the useless talking and hear the sound I'm going for.

 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top