Texas Shooting: Illegal Migrant Shooter?

[Findthetone1]

Ooooohh…you’ll go back to lame, 8th grade insults. Moron.

Lol

Not really. But I promise to answer slowly and in single syllable words so you can keep up.

 

[JackTheBear]

Ooooohh…you’ll go back to lame, 8th grade insults. Moron.

Lol

Do you feel insulted?
Lol

 

[Beater]

Not really. But I promise to answer slowly and in single syllable words so you can keep up.

Do you feel insulted?
Lol

You guys can’t even understand a simple analogy. I’m starting to think you really do share a brain. Lol

 

[pazuzu-bootsy-baphomet-jr]

A shorter way I state that analogy is: You don't wear your seatbelt for the crashes you've NEVER been in. You wear them for the crashes you MIGHT be in.

100% this

 

[Beater]

No? Nobody's ever strapped in and taken on a false sense of confidence and then drove like an asshole and killed somebody?

Do you see what’s wrong here and how it doesn’t actually support your argument?

 

[Beater]

100% this

It may be how you feel about edc, but it is still a weak analogy.

 

[Findthetone1]

Do you see what’s wrong here and how it doesn’t actually support your argument?

I understand perfectly what's going on.
What exactly do you think MY argument is in this?

 

[Beater]

I understand perfectly what's going on.
What exactly do you think MY argument is in this?

Lol

 

[Picasso]

Inbred Bordas Baiter, pulling in the afternoon shift, needed a last minute alt. Go get ‘em Baiter, earn those Bordas Bucks!

 

[Findthetone1]

Lol

So....you don't

 

[JackTheBear]

You guys can’t even understand a simple analogy. I’m starting to think you really do share a brain. Lol

Are you watching the game on TV tonight, Baiter ?

Lol

 

[pazuzu-bootsy-baphomet-jr]

A gun is not analogous with a seatbelt. Body armor might be.

In the types of situations that the average person is likely to encounter, a weapon is more analogous to a seat belt than is armor.

Consider this:

Armor only protects, and unreliably at that, *when you’ve already been shot.”

The objective of the weapon (with associated training, prudence etc) is to help you *avoid being shot or directly attacked in the first place*

 

[Strandberg Junkie]

Nobody's ever strapped in and taken on a false sense of confidence and then drove like an asshole and killed somebody?

Nobody's ever strapped on a gun and taken on a false sense of confidence and then acted like an asshole and killed somebody?

You walked right into it all by yourself you dumb shit.

 

[pazuzu-bootsy-baphomet-jr]

It may be how you feel about edc, but it is still a weak analogy.

The analogy is entirely appropriate

 

[JackTheBear]

The analogy is entirely appropriate

Exactly

 

[Findthetone1]

Nobody's ever strapped on a gun and taken on a false sense of confidence and then acted like an asshole and killed somebody?

You walked right into it all by yourself you dumb shit.

Look at you all clocked back in as Chuckles Sr. with your big girl panties on!
NOT the argument you psycho retard. I didn't walk into shit.

 

[Strandberg Junkie]

The analogy is entirely appropriate

No it isn't.
One is a preventative measure only.
The other is a tool that can be used to fight back.

 

[pazuzu-bootsy-baphomet-jr]

No it isn't.
One is a preventative measure only.
The other is a tool that can be used to fight back.

What then, praytell, is the tool that one would use to “fight back” against an automobile collision?





*spoiler: defense readiness *is* preventive

 

[pazuzu-bootsy-baphomet-jr]

Anyone interested in the question and philosophy of personal defense readiness would be rewarded to read Jeff Cooper’s concise and aptly-named pamphlet

“Principles of Personal Defense”

 

[Beater]

So....you don't

Are you following along okay? Lol