the jerkoff supreme court upholds birthright citizenship. wuuuut bullshit

Here is your original post.


Here is your follow up.


Do you see any difference between these 2 statements?
Of course there is a difference simply because MORE gets thrown in but both posts TO ME are 100% equally true so I still don't agree with your one dynamic cause response is the only and total problem.
 
I'd call it his biggest mistake since she'll be on the supreme court for decades. Trump got completely duped on that one; a lot of people did.
Gorsuch is pretty retarded too. Kavanaugh is the only guy up there along with Thomas and Alito that has a brain. Roberts is a fence sitting dipshit.
 
the 14th amend. was not designed for illegals to cash out in Aumurhika.
i was meant to include the freed slaves and native indians as citizens.
not for illegals to come here, slide out a baby and then they cant be deported because Jr is an Aumurikhan.

this is bullshit. total bullshit

a win for the 3 musketeers. your tax dollars at work supporting everyone but our own

Free health insurance, Free cells phones,, free apartments, free food
and i'm the schmuck who was born here is forced to pay $1000s a month for bennys
Dude, show me, in plain English please, where the 14th amendment guarantees "Free health insurance, Free cells phones,, free apartments, free food"

Also, explain to me, again in plain English, how the SCOTUS can unilaterally amend the constitution. (hint: they can't).

Your problem isn't with the constitution nor the SCOTUS. It's WAY further down the political food chain. If you want your complaint to gain any kind of traction you need to start from a position that isn't, at it's face, ignorant* of the facts and laws.

*ignorant in the dictionary sense meaning "not knowing", not the colloquial sense meaning "you're stupid".
 
You mean Clearance Sale Thomas? He got bought like it was 1726.
A racist comment only a little bitch like you would make. Typical.
Dude, show me, in plain English please, where the 14th amendment guarantees "Free health insurance, Free cells phones,, free apartments, free food"

Also, explain to me, again in plain English, how the SCOTUS can unilaterally amend the constitution. (hint: they can't).

Your problem isn't with the constitution nor the SCOTUS. It's WAY further down the political food chain. If you want your complaint to gain any kind of traction you need to start from a position that isn't, at it's face, ignorant* of the facts and laws.

*ignorant in the dictionary sense meaning "not knowing", not the colloquial sense meaning "you're stupid".
Still waiting for YOU to show me ANYWHERE, in ANY amendment of the Constitution where it applies to driving a motor vehicle. Maybe not play that game when you can't back it up on previous statements.
 
A racist comment only a little bitch like you would make. Typical.

Still waiting for YOU to show me ANYWHERE, in ANY amendment of the Constitution where it applies to driving a motor vehicle. Maybe not play that game when you can't back it up on previous statements.
That wasn't racist. Try again.

You STILL don't understand the analogy. I've explained it, what, 3 or 4 times now. I can't make it any clearer. Just admit understanding it is beyond you.
 
Dude, show me, in plain English please, where the 14th amendment guarantees "Free health insurance, Free cells phones,, free apartments, free food"

Also, explain to me, again in plain English, how the SCOTUS can unilaterally amend the constitution. (hint: they can't).

Your problem isn't with the constitution nor the SCOTUS. It's WAY further down the political food chain. If you want your complaint to gain any kind of traction you need to start from a position that isn't, at it's face, ignorant* of the facts and laws.

*ignorant in the dictionary sense meaning "not knowing", not the colloquial sense meaning "you're stupid".
il_300x300.6925832436_khfc.webp
 
That wasn't racist. Try again.

You STILL don't understand the analogy. I've explained it, what, 3 or 4 times now. I can't make it any clearer. Just admit understanding it is beyond you.
I don't understand one is a privilege and one is a right? You can make all the analogies you want, but that doesn't change those facts to pad your fragile, self-inflated ego. You aren't that smart, Jackoff. No matter what mommy and daddy told you..
 
He was quoting history is how I read it.

Distasteful to some?...maybe, but not racist.
Comparing a black supreme court justice to being sold like an 18th century slave isn't racist? Riiiiggghhhtt. If one of us had said that about Obammy, the pearl clutching bitch boys would be crying louder than Kathy Griffin after she finally saw her reflection.
 
To all you tards who are grasping at anything so you can ignore the fact that Clearance Sale Thomas sold his integrity and his vote to the highest bidder, just like Africans were, historically, sold into slavery. Thomas is now someone's bought property for all "incense and porpoises".

Pointing out that Thomas is black is not racist any more than pointing out that Barrett is female is sexist. Pointing out slavery existed is not racist either.

Get the fuck over yourselves.
 
Comparing a black supreme court justice to being sold like an 18th century slave isn't racist? Riiiiggghhhtt. If one of us had said that about Obammy, the pearl clutching bitch boys would be crying louder than Kathy Griffin after she finally saw her reflection.
I agree BUT, they'd be wrong...as usual
 
Back
Top