The real cost of defaming people

[Bad Brain]

How much does CNN owe the Covington Catholic school kids they falsely accused of racism and ruined their lives?

I think that kid settled a suit against one or a few of the publishers. But yeah, good points. And yeah the libs will ignore all the hypocrisy for sure, ‘cause it’s just about winning and feeling virtuous — or at least appearing “virtuous.”

 

[CrazyNutz]

A lot of sympathy for a SOB that spread false claims, ruining peoples lives, and damaging confidence in our election system.

Is it any surprise that it's coming from the people that wanted that lie to be true, and carried out? NOPE

 

[Bad Brain]

A lot of sympathy for a SOB that spread false claims, ruining peoples lives, and damaging confidence in our election system.

Is it any surprise that it's coming from the people that wanted that lie to be true, and carried out? NOPE

He didn’t damage confidence in our election system. The folks that committed voting fraud and then the folks that prevented full and transparent investigation into all the election anomalies damaged the confidence in our election system. And now these same assholes are damaging confidence in our judicial system. For people that are so concerned about “Our democracy,” either you guys are completely retarded or entirely disingenuous. Wtf bro.

 

[Bad Brain]

So where are all the court cases that prove election fraud occurred to the level of changing the outcome of the election?
Where are the all Supreme Court (packed with Trump appointees) rulings on this?

I didn't say there is proof. I am saying that I am not confident in the election system because of all the anomalies and evidence of voter fraud. Suppressing real investigation supports this inclination. ...If you want someone's confidence, you have to demonstrate why you deserve it. Sure, sometimes lack of trust could be unreasonable, but in this case I don't think you can blame people that don't trust the system. Regardless, giving trust is a personal choice — no one has to if they don't want to. For comparison, how much energy and resources did they put in to investigating the Russia hoax?

You don't like the outcome, so you're blaming the system. ?‍

Yeah, just like I'm racist if I don't like Obama

 

[70 Mach 1]

problem with judgements is try and collect it.

been there done that against a worthless GC

 

[Bad Brain]

You don't like the outcome, so you're blaming the system

Libs are so intetrested in psychologizing or thinking they understand other people's internal motivations and thinking. It's kind of a paranoid thing, and suggests their own "guilt". Maybe you guys should quit trying to get in other peoples heads and do some self-reflection instead. If there is one group of people that are clearly neurotic and unbalanced, it is the American left. I think there have been studies on this.

 

[CrazyNutz]

I didn't say there is proof. I am saying that I am not confident in the election system because of all the anomalies and evidence of voter fraud. Suppressing real investigation supports this inclination. ...If you want someone's confidence, you have to demonstrate why you deserve it. Sure, sometimes lack of trust could be unreasonable, but in this case I don't think you can blame people that don't trust the system. Regardless, giving trust is a personal choice — no one has to if they don't want to.

There are plenty of voter fraud investigations all the time, recounts, and other measures. There was no exception from the last Presidential election,
actually I'm sure it got more scrutiny, and investigations just because of all the crying foul.

For comparison, how much energy and resources did they put in to investigating the Russia hoax?

And how about the Hunter/Joe ukraine hoax? ?‍

Yeah, just like I'm racist if I don't like Obama

I don't go calling people racist unless I actually hear them say something racist.
I've heard people say they didn't care for Obama, didn't like his policies. I've also heard people say he's out to destroy America, etc....

None of that makes them racist at all.

Now that being said, I've heard people use the 'N' word while speaking of Obama (A lot)
I must consider at that point there exists some racial component when people start dropping the N word ?‍

 

[Bad Brain]

I don't go calling people racist unless I actually hear them say something racist.

Well that's great but it's the same idea: you think that because I don't like the outcome I am attacking the system. No, I am attacking the system because I see it as weaponized and unjust, not because I don't like the outcome.

 

[Thumbpicker]

Well that's great but it's the same idea: you think that because I don't like the outcome I am attacking the system. No, I am attacking the system because I see it as weaponized and unjust, not because I don't like the outcome.

Yes you don't have to like him or feel sorry for him to think it's a crazy judgement.

 

[CrazyNutz]

Well that's great but it's the same idea: you think that because I don't like the outcome I am attacking the system. No, I am attacking the system because I see it as weaponized and unjust, not because I don't like the outcome.

We'll you think it's 150k, some court/jury thinks it's 150m. Maybe it's somewhere in the middle, at any rate Rudy has the right to appeal so maybe it'll change.

I do know this, we don't know all the details, the court, and jury does.

 

[311boogieman]

Well, I've studying this stuff for 25 years, so much of the early content (first 2~3 hours of his video) I'm just nodding in agreement with what he's saying, but at some point (wish I could give you a time stamp) he goes, "I'm gonna tell you what is really going on ."

That part (probably the last 90 minutes) was the best part for me.

Can I start at this point and still get the gist of it? I can barely watch this kind of thing for 5 minutes let alone 5 hours due to my Attention IDGAF Disorder

 

[Bad Brain]

Can I start at this point and still get the gist of it? I can barely watch this kind of thing for 5 minutes let alone 5 hours due to my Attention IDGAF Disorder

I listened to the whole thing while I was doing chores yesterday, occasionally glancing at the visuals. I think it’s worth watching although it probably would be as effective at about 2 hrs with editing as it’s repetitive and not particularly organized. I think he’s on to something, but I think he links too many tenuous connections. And my impression is that for full impact you’d need to hold to a Christian worldview, as the idea is basically that those in power are Freemasons and are actually Satanists and are bent on destroying humanity. I tend to suspect by the way that those in power are in secret societies and are bent on destroying humanity.

 

[VonBonfire]

I listened to the whole thing while I was doing chores yesterday, occasionally glancing at the visuals. I think it’s worth watching although it probably would be as effective at about 2 hrs with editing as it’s repetitive and not particularly organized. I think he’s on to something, but I think he links too many tenuous connections. And my impression is that for full impact you’d need to hold to a Christian worldview, as the idea is basically that those in power are Freemasons and are actually Satanists and are bent on conquering and destroying the world.

Matthrew 4:8-9
Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

So the Earth in it's current state is Satan's. He gives authority to those who serve him. Also notice that it is clearly not a globe earth since they can view all the kingdoms from an exceedingly high mountain.

 

[Bad Brain]

So the Earth in it's current state is Satan's. He gives authority to those who serve him

I agree with this, but in an allegorical sense.

Also notice that it is clearly not a globe earth since they can view all the kingdoms from an exceedingly high mountain.

Good point, although globetrotters would probably just say “World” means Judea or something.

 

[VonBonfire]

I agree with this, but in an allegorical sense.

Functionally there is no difference. Except if you say it's allegory then you don't have to deal with a personal God. I't's convenient for you to say so.

 

[Bad Brain]

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g2889/kjv/tr/0-1/
Looks like world to me ? …and ‘mountain’ looks like mountain or hill.

I't's convenient for you to say so.

Sure, from your perspective, but that’s not the motivation. I found it interesting in the video how apparently the Freemasons think atheists are dumb. For me, it’s difficult not to think we live in a created world. I agree with intelligent design theory. But my question still is who.

 

[VonBonfire]

Sure, from your perspective, but that’s not the motivation.

So what's the motivation then?

 

[Bad Brain]

So what's the motivation then?

Truth!

 

[Ben Waylin]

as the idea is basically that those in power are Freemasons and are actually Satanists and are bent on destroying humanity.

On some level, that may appear to be their agenda.. but it is not.

Their agenda is to return this world to the days of Babylon, and live forever in their fallen state.

?

 

[Bad Brain]

Their agenda is to return this world to the days of Babylon, and live forever in their fallen state.

I recall he mentioned a 500M population target, can’t remember the reference. So yeah, what remains of humanity would be the elite/masons slaves right? But to your point, yes that is different than total destruction. And as a lay observer, have to admit this seems plausible ?