lester":2dfricsh said:
James Lugo":2dfricsh said:
Cool, good to see them at it. Though it doesn't sound like VH to me. The songwriting sounds like OG classic rock, the kind of music they destroyed when VHI hit in '78. Kinda weird.
^ This for me as well. I realize evolution and all, but I saw them on their first headlining tour in '79 , the third album, Fair Wairing and Diver Down and nothing about that reminds me of or tops or evolves even from those days.
i look at it like the "stones syndrome" at this point.
they represent an era of rock music that meant so much to so many, when they were kings, that just attempting to play their old stuff, with the DLR/EVH formula, with a semblance of sobriety and decency, will be well received.
you could argue that the stones still sound as good as they ever have, but they weren't writing, nor are they trying to reproduce, high intensity technically challenging songs like "i'm the one" or "unchained" 34 years after the fact. compare those to "brown sugar" or "start me up"......yeah.....
another thought is if VH is going to be held accountable to reproduce new material accurately, eddie is probably thinking "the heck if i'm going to play anything like ice cream man or atomic punks solos and be responsible for playing it well night after night...i'm in my 50s not 20s...and my hands and energy aren't the same"
enter the autopilot solo.
makes sense, until you see holdsworth and gambale blazing impossible lines in their 60s like it was nothing.
but they weren't partying for 40 years like van halen either.