jlbaxe
Banned
Active member
What is the difference between the OD100se+ and a PT100?
Ed Yoon
New member
The CH2 of SE+ is based on the high-gain CH3 of the 3+SE preamp and is more saturated and a little more compressed than the CH2 of the PT100. The PT100 is a little more "open" sounding with less compression. The EQ curve is slightly different as well. The SE+ has a little more sag and low-mids while the PT100 is tighter with more high-mid emphasis.
jlbaxe
Banned
Active member
Thank you. I will Probably like the PT100. I really like the tones that Pete Thorn was getting when he was showing his PT100 in his home. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGErfbbJOqg
tlingen
Active member
Ed's description is right on. I had my SE+ swapped over to a PT100 and it turned out better then I expected it to. Good luck 
mentoneman
Well-known member
The combo in your sig seems like the one to beat in 09!tlingen":1ezt2pdo said:Ed's description is right on. I had my SE+ swapped over to a PT100 and it turned out better then I expected it to. Good luck
I'm wondering if something between the PT and the hedgehog may be the ultimate channel switcher.
Personally I'm not as interested in the high gain as I'd be in a truly sweet dumbly feeling boosted clean channel but both would be bomb!
Maybe a PT with a nice bouncy compression/suhr pedal circuit internally strapped to the boost function of channel 1 so it breaks up naturally like a cranked super/bassman with a tube screamer.
R
R.D.
New member
mentoneman":20el8t24 said:
I think this is EXACTLY what the Suhr branded PT-50 is going to be ( John & Co. are planning on having it readyfor NAMM )
mentoneman
Well-known member
I love compression on my clean and low mid gain tones so I really wouldnt mind a built in circuit like that on the clean and boosted clean tones.
In fact it would probably help counteract the clean boost from getting louder which I'm not interested in at all. I'd rather have the clean boost simply drive the channel harder fir more sensitivity and grit.
The crunch channel can bypass the compression and simply have the boost function on it,
so perhaps the level of boost can be controlled independantly per channel...
In fact it would probably help counteract the clean boost from getting louder which I'm not interested in at all. I'd rather have the clean boost simply drive the channel harder fir more sensitivity and grit.
The crunch channel can bypass the compression and simply have the boost function on it,
so perhaps the level of boost can be controlled independantly per channel...
