Which amp out of these....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greazygeo
  • Start date Start date
Never played one but from what others have said a Cornford RK100 might do it for you.
 
dude didn't you used to have a Sig X? is that a modern style amp or just another marshall knock off? Those amps have seem to dissapeared from the threads when i remember were gaining lots of attention..including mine[/quote]

The Sig X is not just a other Marshall thing.
It is not the best head for low tunning.
It is my favorite channel switcher.
 
From the amps you mentioned I think definately the SLO; it's the most open sounding, less compressed of the bunch although I have to admit that I only know the Elmwoods from clips.

Giga.
 
70strathead":3gtv40l3 said:
dude didn't you used to have a Sig X? is that a modern style amp or just another marshall knock off? Those amps have seem to dissapeared from the threads when i remember were gaining lots of attention..including mine
No I had an UL about 5 years ago. I sell alot of Sig X though :) It's too loose for the 7 string.
 
dawnofdreamx97":3p8cpjis said:
I'd say it's not as dark as the bogner. Just more unique, It'd be the type of amp i'd use for color in a recording , or together blended with a second amp. It was hard to tell where exactly it was voiced frequency wise, because of all the noise @ namm.. but i thought the elmwood stuff was really cool and unique. Nice guys to! :rock:
Cool. I know how it is with NAMM....pretty noisy. I've only heard clips of it so far. None of them were 7 string either.
 
yngzaklynch":4yqkg1ur said:
Never played one but from what others have said a Cornford RK100 might do it for you.
I haven't looked much at those yet. Greg Howe uses them I think. If he can sound good thru them..... :lol: :LOL: Love his playing but his tone isn't usually very good. :)
 
Giga":16hx34ej said:
From the amps you mentioned I think definately the SLO; it's the most open sounding, less compressed of the bunch although I have to admit that I only know the Elmwoods from clips.

Giga.
i like what I hear from the SLO, don't know how they handle the low tuned stuff.
 
Greazygeo":3svsquwy said:
Giga":3svsquwy said:
From the amps you mentioned I think definately the SLO; it's the most open sounding, less compressed of the bunch although I have to admit that I only know the Elmwoods from clips.

Giga.
i like what I hear from the SLO, don't know how they handle the low tuned stuff.

Well, if that's a major concern you should at least try a Herbert. It's absurds how much lows that pumps out. I'm just not sure if you're gonna like it's natural compression in the mids. Fun amp to play though.

Giga.
 
I have a MK IV for one of your Plexis :D

Someone mentioned the RK100 Cornford, that amp is a beast! PatrickJP always had some monster clips with his.

Big bucks though :scared:
 
Greazygeo":1pks0cl9 said:
Giga":1pks0cl9 said:
From the amps you mentioned I think definately the SLO; it's the most open sounding, less compressed of the bunch although I have to admit that I only know the Elmwoods from clips.

Giga.
i like what I hear from the SLO, don't know how they handle the low tuned stuff.

A Soldano with your choice of speakers & cabs would sound :thumbsup:

...well the dude that turned me onto Soldano when I was looking to pick up Mesa Stilleto said he tried both the Avenger and SLO but thought the SLO handled the low tuned stuff better in his band setting. He does some serious low tuning stuff! He thought it was possibly because of those amazing Deyoung transformes was what he speculated on.

...but here's some Drop d stuff with a Hot ROd 50+

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=1cclM6amI ... re=channel


The crunch channel impresses me more and more too. Great southern rock tones etc.

This video still amazes me; done with a $150 Squire strat with a JB in the bridge and that's it; I especially dig it when I plug into mine and get these tones as well!! :rock:

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4nZ1NIS54U
 
Just thought of this, having had a XTC as well...

The sag will not be as much as a Bogner that is for sure; voiced different as well, but with the SLO and the Hi-Fi transformers there is a "touch sensitivity" that is really cool. Not as "ARD" if you get me ;)

I actually hope you get to try one out and post a review.

:cheers:
 
Greazygeo":2rpvoyn3 said:
would I like? Thinking about moving one of my amps for one of these.

Elmwood M90

Soldano SLO

Diezel VH4

Diezel Herbert

others?

I've got the Marshall thing pretty much nailed down with my two plexis, 1959RR and Metalface. The modded Marshall is covered with the Metal. The Fender thing is covered with a BF DR, Vibro Champ and BF Champs. Looking for something more Modern.....

I seriously think you're going to hate all of those, except the Soldano. Remember how much I regretted selling the Wizard for the Diezel ? Again,except for the Soldano, I can't see you keeping the others for very long.

If you can wait a little longer, the Natas amp will do low tunings better than anything else on the planet. It won't have a "typical" metal voicing either.
 
Greazygeo":1d1rob2t said:
stephen sawall":1d1rob2t said:
I like the mids better on the SLO than the Diezel's.

But when you get down there around the C B A notes I like a Tremoverb.
But I do not think that is going to make your list. :)
But yeah, probably not going Mesa :)
Amen brother!
 
Well I have 2 of the ones you mentioned and did have a Herbert at one time. The M90 is probably the most versatile amp I own and has a wonderful wide spectrum of sound. There isn't a clip on the internet that does it justice. Definitely worth checking out.
 
Giga":virzr85n said:
Well, if that's a major concern you should at least try a Herbert. It's absurds how much lows that pumps out. I'm just not sure if you're gonna like it's natural compression in the mids. Fun amp to play though.

Giga.
Gary and I talked about the compression in the Herbert and that is something I don't care for. This amp will be for the lower tuned stuff. All the amps I have right now are not good at it. Also want something more modern voiced for recording.
Digital Jams":virzr85n said:
I have a MK IV for one of your Plexis :D

Someone mentioned the RK100 Cornford, that amp is a beast! PatrickJP always had some monster clips with his.

Big bucks though :scared:
A Mark IV!!! :thumbsup: i had the MKIIC+ and didnt like it at all. :)


dawnofdreamx97":virzr85n said:
yea the rk100 is smokin....
What I've heard of it does sound good, don't recall ever hearing any low tuned stuff.


loudgtr":virzr85n said:
A Soldano with your choice of speakers & cabs would sound :thumbsup:

...well the dude that turned me onto Soldano when I was looking to pick up Mesa Stilleto said he tried both the Avenger and SLO but thought the SLO handled the low tuned stuff better in his band setting. He does some serious low tuning stuff! He thought it was possibly because of those amazing Deyoung transformes was what he speculated on.

...but here's some Drop d stuff with a Hot ROd 50+

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=1cclM6amI ... re=channel


The crunch channel impresses me more and more too. Great southern rock tones etc.

This video still amazes me; done with a $150 Squire strat with a JB in the bridge and that's it; I especially dig it when I plug into mine and get these tones as well!! :rock:

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4nZ1NIS54U
I'll check those later when I get home. The SLO has always intrigued me.

loudgtr":virzr85n said:
Just thought of this, having had a XTC as well...

The sag will not be as much as a Bogner that is for sure; voiced different as well, but with the SLO and the Hi-Fi transformers there is a "touch sensitivity" that is really cool. Not as "ARD" if you get me ;)

I actually hope you get to try one out and post a review.

:cheers:
Yeah had an Uber and XTC and have played the Shiva quite abit. Bogners just are not my thing.

thegame":virzr85n said:
I seriously think you're going to hate all of those, except the Soldano. Remember how much I regretted selling the Wizard for the Diezel ? Again,except for the Soldano, I can't see you keeping the others for very long.

If you can wait a little longer, the Natas amp will do low tunings better than anything else on the planet. It won't have a "typical" metal voicing either.
Yeah I don't know yet. I remember talking at length with you about the Herbert. I've just decided that the Modern has the same tone as I get from my Plexi. Since i'm not doing the band thing anymore and focusing on recording it would be nice to have something different. Not that this would be my main amp by any means. But I could stand to have something "different" when needed. :)

johnnyjellybean":virzr85n said:
Well I have 2 of the ones you mentioned and did have a Herbert at one time. The M90 is probably the most versatile amp I own and has a wonderful wide spectrum of sound. There isn't a clip on the internet that does it justice. Definitely worth checking out.
Between that and the SLO which handle the low tuning better? I'm not looking for earthshattering lows, but it needs to stay tight and clear in those lower ranges.
 
Greazygeo":18dfw7y7 said:
Giga":18dfw7y7 said:
Well, if that's a major concern you should at least try a Herbert. It's absurds how much lows that pumps out. I'm just not sure if you're gonna like it's natural compression in the mids. Fun amp to play though.

Giga.
Gary and I talked about the compression in the Herbert and that is something I don't care for. This amp will be for the lower tuned stuff. All the amps I have right now are not good at it. Also want something more modern voiced for recording.
Digital Jams":18dfw7y7 said:
I have a MK IV for one of your Plexis :D

Someone mentioned the RK100 Cornford, that amp is a beast! PatrickJP always had some monster clips with his.

Big bucks though :scared:
A Mark IV!!! :thumbsup: i had the MKIIC+ and didnt like it at all. :)


dawnofdreamx97":18dfw7y7 said:
yea the rk100 is smokin....
What I've heard of it does sound good, don't recall ever hearing any low tuned stuff.


loudgtr":18dfw7y7 said:
A Soldano with your choice of speakers & cabs would sound :thumbsup:

...well the dude that turned me onto Soldano when I was looking to pick up Mesa Stilleto said he tried both the Avenger and SLO but thought the SLO handled the low tuned stuff better in his band setting. He does some serious low tuning stuff! He thought it was possibly because of those amazing Deyoung transformes was what he speculated on.

...but here's some Drop d stuff with a Hot ROd 50+

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=1cclM6amI ... re=channel


The crunch channel impresses me more and more too. Great southern rock tones etc.

This video still amazes me; done with a $150 Squire strat with a JB in the bridge and that's it; I especially dig it when I plug into mine and get these tones as well!! :rock:

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4nZ1NIS54U
I'll check those later when I get home. The SLO has always intrigued me.

loudgtr":18dfw7y7 said:
Just thought of this, having had a XTC as well...

The sag will not be as much as a Bogner that is for sure; voiced different as well, but with the SLO and the Hi-Fi transformers there is a "touch sensitivity" that is really cool. Not as "ARD" if you get me ;)

I actually hope you get to try one out and post a review.

:cheers:
Yeah had an Uber and XTC and have played the Shiva quite abit. Bogners just are not my thing.

thegame":18dfw7y7 said:
I seriously think you're going to hate all of those, except the Soldano. Remember how much I regretted selling the Wizard for the Diezel ? Again,except for the Soldano, I can't see you keeping the others for very long.

If you can wait a little longer, the Natas amp will do low tunings better than anything else on the planet. It won't have a "typical" metal voicing either.
Yeah I don't know yet. I remember talking at length with you about the Herbert. I've just decided that the Modern has the same tone as I get from my Plexi. Since i'm not doing the band thing anymore and focusing on recording it would be nice to have something different. Not that this would be my main amp by any means. But I could stand to have something "different" when needed. :)

johnnyjellybean":18dfw7y7 said:
Well I have 2 of the ones you mentioned and did have a Herbert at one time. The M90 is probably the most versatile amp I own and has a wonderful wide spectrum of sound. There isn't a clip on the internet that does it justice. Definitely worth checking out.
Between that and the SLO which handle the low tuning better? I'm not looking for earthshattering lows, but it needs to stay tight and clear in those lower ranges.

Slo with a depth mod done has huge lows but the M90 does also and definitely is more versatile. You can't go wrong with either one. I love the SLO sound and have since the begining since I bought #008 in 1988. They are built just about as tough as the Wizards. The M90 on the other hand covers more ground. If you buy a SLO used, chances are it will retain its value forever being that it has been a mainstay for over 20 years now. If you told me I had to choose one, I wouldn't be able to. I didn't like the Herbert and found the preamp to be a little grainy sounding compared to my other amps.
 
Digital Jams":16hnqs95 said:
I have a MK IV for one of your Plexis :D

Someone mentioned the RK100 Cornford, that amp is a beast! PatrickJP always had some monster clips with his.

Big bucks though :scared:
Great suggestion. That amp is a beast and its simplicity is a plus. Great sounding and very very loud of an amp.
 
You could also slave your current amps into a VHT 2150/Mesa Strategy 400/SS power amp. That'll really tighten things up, but won't really change the voicing into a modern one. Just an idea.

You had the ENGLs for a while, wouldn't that do the trick ?
 
Back
Top