
Findthetone1
Well-known member
Just trying to coach you along to be a better person, Squishy.Originality isn't your strong point, but I understand your desire to follow my lead![]()
Just trying to coach you along to be a better person, Squishy.Originality isn't your strong point, but I understand your desire to follow my lead![]()
There you go now asking sensible questions. Y'all can't be bringin' that shit up in here.to the lefties in this thread I ask you , why are Obamas college records all sealed? would you had been ok if Trump sealed all of his past records?
you went nuts enough over his tax returns which showed nothing that Pelosi and the other "self made" Dems have been doing for years,
so why is Obama 'exempt"?
Two words, white guilt.to the lefties in this thread I ask you , why are Obamas college records all sealed? would you had been ok if Trump sealed all of his past records?
you went nuts enough over his tax returns which showed nothing that Pelosi and the other "self made" Dems have been doing for years,
so why is Obama 'exempt"?
Holy shitstained Christ; you guys will believe any fucking thing that you’re told by some bullshit pundit.to the lefties in this thread I ask you , why are Obamas college records all sealed? would you had been ok if Trump sealed all of his past records?
you went nuts enough over his tax returns which showed nothing that Pelosi and the other "self made" Dems have been doing for years,
so why is Obama 'exempt"?
You really think Factcheckers are real factcheckers LOL. Factcheck.org is 100% leftist propaganda , so is Politico and the rest .Holy shitstained Christ; you guys will believe any fucking thing that you’re told by some bullshit pundit.
https://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/
The main stream media NEVER EVER TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT ANYTHING . They alter , delete , edit , omit and add wording to fit their narratives 100% of the time and have been doing that for decades .
A small example of main stream media sources below , all listed names are guilty of it and can NEVER be trusted.
Cnn, Msnbc, Abc, Cbs, Nbc, HuffPost, NYT, WashPost, The AP, BuzzFeed, Politico, NewsWeek, The Hill, Rolling Stone, Twitter , Sky News, Mediate, The Atlantic, USA Today, Time magazine, LA Times, Politifact, Reuters, Facebook , BBC, Wikipedia, Boston Globe, Vox, The Miami Herald, Mother Jones, Instagram, Factcheck .or, HLN , Yahoo, MSN, NY Daily News, Vice, Univision, People magazine, PBS, NPR, New Yorker, Wall Street Journal, Daily Beast, Bloomberg, Aurn, National Journal, BI ,
It's very very very difficult to find factual information these days since all search engines only link to propaganda sources .
Try searching for political info on Google and other main stream search engines for instance , the ONLY links they will show you are from the above sources . Twitter and Facebook will also ONLY link to the above sources .
99.9% of all factcheckers are liberal owned and funded as well and their sole purpose is to confirm the lies that the above sources report . It fools a lot of people because they truly believe factcheckers are legit factcheckers but nothing could be further from the truth .
By far the best way to know with 100% certainty what's factual info is to seek out what the above listed sources insist is disinformation because what they claim is disinformation and not trustworthy is ALWAYS 100% trustworthy .
What the above sources promote as real news IS NEVER EVER real news .
You really think Factcheckers are real factcheckers LOL. Factcheck.org is 100% leftist propaganda , so is Politico and the rest .
The great Wikileaks list of propaganda outlets came out years ago , I guess you missed it or will you try to say Wkileaks is not truthful LOL.
Check deez nuts.Fact checkers???
Have you bothered to check the sources of the garbage lies you post? Do you have any idea how incredibly stupid you appear to everyone around you? What kind of mop do you use to clean up the gallons of drool that you leave on the floor of your rusty trailer every day? Or do you even bother?This is great stuff CCN.
Gotta remember, lotsa these guys still think ‘fact-check’ is real??
I loved Obama. The stock market screamed under him (and Trump). I made lots of money. I just hope everyone was smart enough to participate. If I saw Obama I'd thank him for making my wallet big and fat.Ahh Obama, the OG of living rent free in your head![]()
There ya go!Check deez nuts.
https://noqreport.com/2022/02/09/how-fact-checking-is-controlled-and-faked/
- Fact-checking is one part of the campaign to control what you see online, and therefore what you think and how you perceive reality
- Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson explains how virtually everything you see and hear online has been co-opted, or taken over to serve a greater agenda
- Instead of real journalists and reporters, the media is infiltrated with propagandists who dictate what’s “fake news” and what’s not
- The public is being manipulated to want their information censored by third-party “fact”-checkers, which were introduced as a tool to confuse and control the public further
- “Conspiracy theory”, “debunked”, “quackery” and “antivaccine” are examples of terms that are being used as propaganda tools; if you hear them, it should make you dig deeper for the truth.
- Those who rely solely on the internet for their information are at serious risk of being controlled; you can fight back by doing your own research, trusting your cognitive dissonance and using your common sense
Why is everything you disagree with a lie?Have you bothered to check the sources of the garbage lies you post? Do you have any idea how incredibly stupid you appear to everyone around you? What kind of mop do you use to clean up the gallons of drool that you leave on the floor of your rusty trailer every day? Or do you even bother?
Oh...But he seems so smart and reasonable.
You need to understand that leftists have always gotten their info from the mainstream so when they see info that completely contradicts the mainstream stuff they they have always been fed to believe they instantly think it must be false .
Snopes is the brainchild of husband and wife team Barbara and David P. Mikkelson, launched in 1995 at the pinnacle of the “MoveOn” from the Bill Clinton impeachment era.
As reported by Daily Headlines – “Snopes main fact checker is Kim Lacapria, who was formerly with Inquisitr, a site known for publishing fake quotes and hoaxes. Lacapria was a huge disaster as a writer with many of her stories getting just 10 to 20 shares. She is a vitriolic far left wing blogger. While at Inquisitr she described herself as an openly left leaning liberal.”
David P. Mikkelson was accused of embezzlement in a divorce proceeding and arrested on charges of fraud and corruption. Mikkelson’s wife is reportedly a “non-voting Canadian.”
Yet, Snopes has been quoted as a reliable “fact checker” even recently, including by a few ill-advised or downright corrupt Federal Judges. For anyone to rely on such an overtly unreliable operation is either gross ignorance or an intentional misinformation op.
Much moreFactCheck.org is a creation of Annenberg Project, which of course, begs the question — who and what is Annenberg Project?
For starters, Annenberg Project is Barack Hussein Obama’s first community organizing employer in Chicago, as exposed by Thomas Lifson at American Thinker in 2008. Obama was a star student under the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, working in concert with lifelong cohorts William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn of Weather Underground fame.
On a broader view, Annenberg is a well-funded national community organizing operation highly active on college campuses. FactCheck.org is a subsidiary of Annenberg, designed to help control the public dialogue on behalf of Annenberg community organizing interests by simply labeling any information not favorable to their community organizing efforts as “fake” or “false.” Again, Goebbels would be proud.
A glimpse into the quality of fact checking by Annenberg is seen in their fact checking opinion of Snopes, which is almost comical. Essentially, these orgs are part of a closed-circuit left-leaning community organizing info-op that grant each other credentials based on utter nonsense. That’s the same system they use to check facts.
During the interview, Sanger admitted that while the online encyclopedia began with good intentions it is now just another tool to parrot left-wing talking points and censor those who challenge the mainstream narrative.
“Wikipedia made a real effort at neutrality for, I would say, its first five years or so,” said Sanger.
“And then … it began a long, slow slide into what I would call leftist propaganda.”
Summit.news reports: Wikipedia is run by around 125,000 volunteer editors, the vast majority of whom are leftists, with a further 1,000 administrators who enjoy special privileges to block others who go against the grain.
Sanger explained how Wikipedia now serves not just to skew information, but to viciously demonize anyone on the right or anyone deemed to be a “contrarian.”
Wikipedia “casts them as conspiracy theorists, are far right or whatever, when they and their friends and people who know them well would never describe them in that way,” Sanger said.
After banning sources such as Fox News or the Daily Mail, Wikipedia now relies almost entirely on far-left outlets and legacy media sources to determine truth.
“More recently, they’ve gotten rid of almost all conservative news sources as sources for their articles,” he said
“And so as the news media has shifted, and as the establishment, frankly, has shifted more to the left or to the left, the content of Wikipedia has followed suit.”
As we previously highlighted, a perfect example of Wikipedia’s extreme political bias was evident when the website’s editors deliberately sought to bury links between convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton.
The fact that Clinton flew on Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ private jet at least 26 times, which was reported by the media multiple times back in 2016, disappeared from Wikipedia before it was added back in after an outcry.
Editors also sought to scrub any of Epstein’s links to Clinton while amplifying his links to Donald Trump, which were less direct and less damaging.