And yet, isn’t it the pro-gunners that carry to all these places because they are afraid they may need to defend themselves everywhere they go? You are so fucking stupid sometimes. LolMass shootings" is a term that has been corrupted by anti-gunners to scare people into thinking they can't go to a library or a grocery store without being shot.
And yet, isn’t it the pro-gunners that carry to all these places because they are afraid they may need to defend themselves everywhere they go? You are so fucking stupid sometimes. Lol
Hey, chubby nut cradler, how's about coming up with a new reply? Just for the mental exercise. You could use some.?Attacking - Trolling - Baiter the Clown?
… helping to make Rigtalk ‘more respectable’
Lol
I’m sure this whole topic has been beaten to absolute death already, BUTAnd yet, isn’t it the pro-gunners that carry to all these places because they are afraid they may need to defend themselves everywhere they go? You are so fucking stupid sometimes. Lol
That’s a weak analogy.I’m sure this whole topic has been beaten to absolute death already, BUT
the concept of self-defense readiness is the same as the concept of a vehicle safety belt
you don’t put on your seat belt because you’re “afraid” you might have a collision
you put on your seat belt because it is *plausible* that you may have a collision,
and collisions may have undesirable results,
therefore it is *prudent* to wear your seat belt,
even though the considerable majority of seat-belt-wearers will never be involved in a collision whose survivability depends on the seat belt
In what way is it weak?That’s a weak analogy.
A gun is not analogous with a seatbelt. Body armor might be.In what way is it weak?
A shorter way I state that analogy is: You don't wear your seatbelt for the crashes you've NEVER been in. You wear them for the crashes you MIGHT be in.I’m sure this whole topic has been beaten to absolute death already, BUT
the concept of self-defense readiness is the same as the concept of a vehicle safety belt
you don’t put on your seat belt because you’re “afraid” you might have a collision
you put on your seat belt because it is *plausible* that you may have a collision,
and collisions may have undesirable results,
therefore it is *prudent* to wear your seat belt,
even though the considerable majority of seat-belt-wearers will never be involved in a collision whose survivability depends on the seat belt
No, it's not.That’s a weak analogy.
Yes, it is. Putting on your seat belt isn’t potentially going to kill or injure someone else. Moron. LolNo, it's not.
No? Nobody's ever strapped in and taken on a false sense of confidence and then drove like an asshole and killed somebody?Yes, it is. Putting on your seat belt isn’t potentially going to kill or injure someone else. Moron. Lol
No? Nobody's ever strapped in and taken on a false sense of confidence and then drove like an asshole and killed somebody?
You might want to slither away for this one while you can.
YOU
WILL
NOT
WIN
“While I can”? Whats going to happen? LolNo? Nobody's ever strapped in and taken on a false sense of confidence and then drove like an asshole and killed somebody?
You might want to slither away for this one while you can.
YOU
WILL
NOT
WIN
“While I can”? Whats going to happen? Lol
Well, nothing that will help your self confidence. So that along with your probable micro penis will probably leave you curled up in a corner crying like Chuckles.“While I can”? Whats going to happen? Lol
Ooooohh…you’ll go back to lame, 8th grade insults. Moron.Well, nothing that will help your self confidence. So that along with your probable micro penis will probably leave you curled up in a corner crying like Chuckles.
But hey, tee it up if you feel inclined to do so![]()
![]()